In this paper I will take a gander at John Greyson's film Proteus and talk about courses in which it uncovered and bursts predominant manliness standards and practices which stay widespread in South Africa today. The key terms and ideas that will be considered in the article is that of Queer theory, New queer cinema, Anachronism, Nomenclature and masculinity and sexual relationships, AND queertime "Queer theory addresses and disentangles standardizing classes of sex and sexuality through its basic practices". "Queer theory has educated and keeps on directing activism around the legislative issues of sexuality through an assortment of social practices". "Strange hypothesis is a reaction to the difficulties postured to lesbian and gay freedom …show more content…
The attributes of 'new queer cinema' are; regardless of the quick standards of satisfactory subjects managed by western pop culture, this sort of film offers voice to the minimized, they are unashamed in regards to their character's issues or rather violations. This kind of cinema resist the sacredness of the past, particularly the homophobic past, it habitually oppose true to life tradition as far as frame, substance and class, these films from various perspectives resist demise. However, the key route in which demise is opposed is as far as Aids or detest wrongdoing. It isn't just that a feeling of insubordination describes these films, yet that it marks them as strange. Queer new cinema most essential capacity is as an umbrella term or discover just for joining different types of non-straight sexual character. Queer speaks to the protection from, fundamentally, the regulating codes of sex and sexual articulation that manly men lay down with female ladies yet in addition to the prohibitive capability of gay and lesbian sexuality-that exclusive men lay down with men, and ladies lay down with ladies. Along these lines, strange as a basic idea, envelops the non-fixity of sex articulation and the non-fixity of both straight and gay sexuality. (Aaron, …show more content…
The film influences utilization of "queer time" through anachronistic time. Anachronism is an utility of queer time. Through a non-direct account that starts at the end. Through the utilization of Virgil, a character who lived 30 years after Claas and Rijkhaart. Through the demise of the primary characters; Coke bottles, Land Rover, Cape Town's contemporary city scape, Policemen in Apartheid uniform and in addition the wet-sack torment system utilized amid Apartheid. "… Not just an accentuation of the thought that we experience the past with our current interpretive edges, the spectrality of the present on the past figures a kind of responsibility of the present to its own comprehension of the past" (Aseneault 2013:
Contrasting with the vinyl records industry, the Australian film industry during the 1960’s-1970s was not as successful as expected, due to the leading of American film industry. Even if it was a small boom in the film industry with movies mainly inspired by the war, it didn’t last long because of the costs of the equipment, imported from America. The movies that people around Australia could see on the 1000 screens around Australia (by 1965) were mostly American and British films for young people inspired in the American lifestyle, like Butch and Cassidy or Easy Rider. In 1961, the pill changed the meaning of sexuality.
Our youth has been reduced to nothing but screens and keyboards. By reversing time, Morgenstern yanks us back to a time when children spend the entirety of their
While he looks fondly on memories of the past the looming presence of the present and future are very prominent throughout his essay. Their expert use of narration assists the telling of their stories and how they view their past experiences.
Such dynamic is strictly heteronormative due to the disdain for homosexuality in the scheme of Dominican hypermasculinity. When discussing Oscar’s characteristics Yunior compared him to “that fat homo Oscar Wilde,” as a method of demeaning homosexuality (180). The rejection of homosexuals is a mechanism by which the Dominican males work to assert their heteronormative sexuality, reinforcing their masculine traits. Males actively ridicule homosexuality with contempt evident when Oscar’s uncle shares a box of condoms with him and advises him to “use them all, he said, and then added: On girls” (51). This homophobia encourages a detrimental heteronormative discourse that asserts a clear-cut sexual orientation for Dominican
Many of the viewer know the film is based upon events which occurred in real life. During the beginning of the film, in black and white displayed are freedom and land rights banners, riots, and protests. During the 1960’s people wanted to be free, thus the Aboriginal Freedom Rides declaration proceeded. Other than that there are little details throughout the film depicting the era. |Can you name the certain things depicting the era?
Vraketta then discusses about sexuality, and notes that in the film the villain is a representation of homosexuality and the hero represents heterosexuality.
Throughout the film, femininity has made some small advances towards modern day culture in a progressive manner. Sexuality as defined by the Oxford Living
There is also a specific focus on British or English homosexuality and their proclivity for it. “Englishmen came to love one another decently, without shame, or make-believe, under the easy likelihoods of their sudden deaths... While Europe died meanly in its own wastes, men loved”¹. Despite the prejudice and dubious morality of homosexuality at the time, men ended up loving each other in the face of death and imminent destruction. Along these lines, there is a distinct tenderness found in the language and exchanges between men. No one, “can fail to notice there the unique physical tenderness, the readiness to admire openly the bodily beauty of young men, the unapologetic recognition that men may be in love with each other”¹, this again subverts the idea that there was no open homosexuality at the front lines.
Historically, the process of drag was not always considered a deviant activity. Within the realms of entertainment gender fluidity has been embraced because a woman 's presence in the theatre had been the exception rather than the rule. The theatre was grounded in religion, and having women on stage was not considered correct or modest. This belief, initiated by The Greeks and bolstered by the Christian insistence on female chastity, believed that allowing women to perform publicly would be too dangerous since their realm was the home. Therefore, having men portray women within the theatre neutralized this danger.
The film is a masterful combination of avant-garde and exploitation aesthetics that results in a collage of dialogues, memories, interviews, thoughts, lyrics and extracts presented in psychedelically vague narration, rather than a "regular" film. Furthermore, Matsumoto managed to demolish almost every taboo existing at the time: nudity, sex, drugs, but most of all, the unfaltering depiction of the Japanese gay society through the eyes of a transvestite made the majority of the other films of the movement seem almost
The queer historical past has been characterized positively, with aspects such as identification, desire, longing, and love highlighted (31). In contrast, Heather Love seeks to focus on the negative aspects that characterize the relationship of queer history amid the past and present, in her work, “Emotional Rescue: The demands of Queer History,” the first chapter in her book, “Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History” (31-32). According to Love, some queer critics have failed to include the harsher accounts when studying queer cross-historical relations. The negative aspects of the past that queer figures can relate to makes it relevant. In her article, Love critiques various works to identify the negative aspects present within the queer history.
3.2) A social/public issue affecting youth in South Africa, or in any part of the world: Moral, religious and legal attitudes are definite interferences with sexual behavior as well as an ostensible insight of the medical and psychological aspects of homosexuality. This phenomenon is possibly much less destructive of social aspects of our society and culture than is commonly believed, since it is actually more prevalent than is generally acknowledged. Homosexuality is most likely a result of hormonal and undoubtedly social and psychological factors.
While Disney cinema appears to constantly equate queerness with evil, at the same time, they are opening the door for diverse representations of queerness by blurring the binary oppositions of gender and presenting dynamic expressions that challenge everything that is considered
These characters may be relatable to the males in the world who identify as gay and are also feminine, however these representations completely undermine the idea that one’s sexuality can be separated from their expected gender role, and may in fact reinforce the heterosexist idea that sexual attraction to men is synonymous with a more feminine gender role. The relationship between popular culture and heteronormativity is eloquently described by Robert Westerfelhaus & Celeste Lacroix: “In the past, the dominant features of this order were clearly articulated through the promulgation of restrictive secular laws and the preaching of an equally limited--and limiting--view of moral law. Today, popular culture exercises perhaps the greatest influence in promoting --and policing--the values of
Summary Michel Foucault’s “The History of Sexuality” explores how the topic of sexuality came to be so censored and secretive, and how sex came to become a discourse in modern society. Foucault emphasizes the various concepts that play into the past three to four centuries, and how society shapes its norms in order to believe the reality it thinks of itself truly exist while none else does. The free behavior of sexuality becomes entrapped within a society seeking to shape its individuals in a manner which meets a specific norm, labeling all who fail to meet the characteristics as abnormal, different, even criminal and sick. Modern society criminalizes differences, demonizes abnormal sexual behavior, taboos the language, and yet is fascinated by the endless details of that very concept which they attempt to treat as nonexistent.