INTRODUCTION:
This paper will argue that in John Perry 's “A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality”, despite Weirob being correct in her belief that personal identity is not purely represented by the immaterial/unobservable soul, personal identity is the product of the integration of the material and immaterial experience of an individual. (50)
EXPOSITION:
Perry 's “A Dialogue...”, features Gretchen Weirob, a philosophy professor, coming to terms with her own mortality after suffering life-threatening injuries from a motorcycle accident. Two friends come to chat with Weirob, and the three engage in a debate over how to qualify personal identity and the possibility of identity existing beyond death of the physical body.
In their debate, Weirob is in opposition to her friends in her belief that personal identity is vested in her physical, or material, existence. Because of this, she does not believe in the continuation of her identity past her physical death. Weirob 's friends, however, contend that personal identity is not exclusively bound to material existence. Instead, they believe personal identity is immaterial, being composed of thoughts, memories, opinions, etc., which can exist beyond death of the physical body.
Despite their efforts, Weirob 's friends ultimately fail to convince her
…show more content…
When it is said that the immaterial “substantiates” the material existence, this means that the immaterial determines and justifies the behaviors of the material body in its environment. Without the material and immaterial interacting in such a way, the physical body would behave irrationally and possibly in ways that would undermine its ability to facilitate a functional individual. Additionally, the immaterial motivations and methods of achieving of the material body 's pursuits, be those pursuits as basic as shelter, warmth and food, or as complex as a presidential campaign, both exhibit traits that are specific to an individual and constitutes personal
Miller’s arguments for Julia surviving are that after the operation of Julia and Mary, Julia survived even though she was in Mary’s body because the body remembered being Julia and didn’t know anything about Mary. This here is evidence to prove Miller’s argument against Weirob that a person cannot be simply identified as bodily identity. This argument by Miller claims that a body isn’t needed or required to identify continued existence but personal identity is which is the mind, memories, ideas, beliefs, and similar behavior for a person to continue living. This is a trait seemed to what happen after the operation where Julia in Mary’s body remembered being Julia and not Mary. The person had Julia’s memories, ideas, and behaviors while showing
In John Perry’s The Third Night, Weirob argues that without her body, even if she maintains the same brain, she will not be herself. She uses the example of Julia and Mary Frances to try and persuade Miller and Cohen that because she has “never seen [her body, she has] no attachment to it” (Perry 48). If someone was walking down the street and saw his friend, that person would be recognized by his body and by his physical appearance. The same can be said if someone had to be identified in a police line up.
In the novel A Separate Peace, John Knowles conveys to the reader the theme of identity through each character’s hardships during the WWII era. The protagonist, Gene Forrester, displays his own struggle for identity during his adolescence in which he attended the Devon School. Leper is another character who dealt with the same issues as shown through his mental breakdown when faced with the rigors of basic training. Even Finny the charismatic leader that all the boys admired began to experience his own identity crisis after he broke his leg and could no longer play sports. The author uses characters with varying personalities to show anyone can have problems with finding their true selves.
1. Sense of Identity A."Edna began to feel uneasy. She was seized with a vague dread. Her own like experiences seemed far away, unreal, and only half remembered. She recalled faintly an ecstasy of pain, the heavy odor of chloroform, a stupor which had deadened sensation, and an awakening to find a little new life to which she had given being, added to the great unnumbered multitude of souls that come and go.
For thousands of years, people have puzzled over the question “What gives something its identity?” There are several different lines of philosophical thinking that seek to answer this question. Some people believe that an item’s identity is derived from its material composition. Others support a more objective viewpoint that it is others’ memories of something that gives it its identity, or one’s own personal memories. In The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, Jean-Dominique Bauby experiences a situation which could lead someone to question his identity.
To me I think the most important things in personal identity are consciousness, experience, and memories; without them we would become the person who we are
Quest to Find One’s Self As one ages, one looks to discover who he will become, and how he will fit in the world. However, one must face many obstacles in his quest to find his identity so that he may satisfy the natural human urge to have a purpose. Without an identity, one would not be able to fulfill their purpose, and would instead live aimlessly. Therefore, people aspire to have a strong minded identity, and they look to others in their aspirations.
Student’s Name Professor’s Name Course Name 13 October 2015 Topic 1. Dennett, “Where Am I?” The narrative by Dennett poses a discussion in the area of identity perception.
A Separate Peace, by John Knowles, is an unsettling fable about the dark side of adolescence. The long-time American classic takes place during the early years of World War II at a New England boys’ boarding school, where Gene and Phineas are best friends, but become troubled by the loss of innocence as they progress in their adolescence. As the story progresses you see the two boys struggle to identify their own individual identity. The self-identity struggle both of the boys encounter serves as the basis for the major theme in the story of the threat of codependency to identity.
In “A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality”, Gretchen Weirob and Sam Miller conduct a philosophical debate about the possibility of a continued existence after death. Weirob argues that she herself cannot exist after death because her identity is composed of her body, rationality, and consciousness. In Derek Parfit’s “Personal Identity” he ponders how the concept of identity works, and how the true nature of our identity affects some of the most important questions we have about our existence. I believe that Velleman did a better job of exploring the idea of identity than Weirob did.
Later, the cultural critic Stuart Hall has opined about the changing nature of identity. He says that there is no fixed identity that can be attributed to an individual for his life period; it evolves through several changes in each phase of life. So it can be understood that formation of identity involves several steps: construction, reconstruction and deconstruction. The politics behind this formation may depend on the nature of identity that an individual tries to hold. Indeed, the cultural critic Kobena Mercer reminds us: “One thing at least is clear - identity only becomes an issue when it is in crisis, when something
In John Knowles’s novel A Separate Peace Identity is shown as what defines us and makes us be placed in other peoples perspectives. An author can use identity to place characters in the readers mind to portray them a certain way, just as John Knowles did in A Separate peace. An identity can be defined as who a person is inside and out.
Identity is simply all-or nothing. The second belief that he targets regards the importance of personal identity; important matters involving survival, memory and responsibility.
The argument of whether or not a human has a soul has been argued throughout centuries. Derek Parfit discusses two separate theories of personal identity, Ego Theory and Bundle Theory. The argument of which present a more accurate account of personhood is very hard to determine. The Ego Theory has some flaws such the soul is separate from the body and is a immaterialist object within us. Bundle Theory is reinforced and proven by the split-brain case, however it can lead to the argument that there is no self.
For many years, the issue of self-identity has been a problem that philosophers and scholars have been to explain using different theories. The question on self –identity tries to explain the concept of how a person today is different from the one in the years to come. In philosophy, the theory of personal identity tries to solve the questions who we are, our existence, and life after death. To understand the concept of self-identity, it is important to analyze a person over a period under given conditions. Despite the numerous theories on personal identity, the paper narrows down the study to the personal theories of John Locke and Rene Descartes, and their points of view on personal identity.