In the argument “A Pirate but Not a Thief: What Does Stealing Mean in a Digital Environment” By Alex Mullen, the author did a great job stating his side on whether or not downloading a movie from an internet torrent site is stealing or not. The Author stated his reasoning using definitions and examples to convince his audience. He used his own experiences to show how downloading a movie did not affect himself or the creator or owner of that movie. However, the author did not convince me that using a torrent site is perfectly ok and believe the author, although very convincing in his words, was not successful in convincing me that it is ok to take other peoples work freely from sites on the internet, therefore, making him a pirate and a thief. …show more content…
The U.S. Congress was first introduced to the NET Act in 1990 to deter people from downloading files by threatening large fines. With the internet and electronic technology growing quickly the NET Act passed into law by 1997. The NET Act being passed made it a federal crime to distribute files. If more than ten copies of material that is being copyrighted is being distributed within 180 days, the person making the copies can be punished with a fine or time in jail. So legally using a torrent site to receive free movie files is against the law and consider to be stealing. Although the author could be protected under fair use because he was using the copy for school and it did not substantially affect the value of the work. However, if one person downloads the movie, then we know there are probably many more doing the same therefore the downloading becomes bigger than just borrowing. In the argument, the author states that he does not see what he was doing as stealing, although he states his other options for renting the movie through a reliable and authorized site. He also claims to have deleted the movie shortly after watching and doing his assignment on the movie downloaded. Deleting the file did not make the illegal downloading of the file ok. It is still a crime to use torrent sites to download movies and considered to be an act of piracy. The author also stated that when using …show more content…
The author was almost convincing enough to be successful in his argument, but looking at the law and what it means to pirate files from the internet convinced me that he was wrong. Although it was not a common thing for the author to do he had other options for getting the film he needed and could have taken a different path to attain the film. There was no mention of copyright laws in the argument which could have been useful and assisted in the argument 's success. The author was unable to convince me that piracy is not stealing due to the definitions of the two being similar and due to the laws against piracy and copyright
In a complaint by Dirmeyer, a search warrant was issued by the Magistrate of Northern District of California and location of AACBBS was searched and defendants computer system was seized on December 10, 1994. Charges on 12 counts were framed by the Federal Grand Jury against the defendants (Robert Thomas and his wife Carleen) for violating US law of obscenity and knowingly carrying on inter-state trade of offences and the Court ordered the forfeiture. They were found guility of the offences and the Court ordered the forfeiture of defendant’s computer system and sentenced Robert Thoamas to 37 months imprisonment and his wife Carleen to 30 months imprisonment. The defendants appealed against their conviction on the ground that the Tennessee Court has no Jurisdiction to try their case because the alleged offence related to intangible object like computer GIF files committed in California, to which the provisions of Section 1465 of 18 USC did not apply, and that the section did not expressly prohibit or regulate the computer transactions involved in the instant
On the topic of fair use, Everyone’s an Author says that generally
The issue later rises on how the court interpreted copyright law in terms of the digital era and the court’s indulgent understanding of
Student sues college for accusations of plagiarism James Lowell is suing Green Hills College for 600,000 dollars after its Judicial Board has decided to suspend him for plagiarism. “We don’t feel that he was properly informed of the Judicial Board’s definition of plagiarism before he was accused of doing something wrong,” Attorney Janet Fillmore, who represents Lowell said. However, Dean Houston from the college said, “The college’s Judicial Board made the decision after fully considering all aspects of the case. It was also a decision without bias.”
Starting with the foundation of Hollywood, he describes how film makers moved to California to escape the reach of copyright laws that protected the inventions of Thomas Edison that made film production possible. In this case, the binary is between Edison, backed by federal law, and filmmakers such as Fox and Paramount, who pirated his inventions in order to pioneer the film industry. Lessig draws a pattern between these past discrepancies and P2P sharing, claiming that both occur in an attempt to “escape an overly controlling industry.” In the case of P2P sharing, the binary is between the music industry and the general public. By using binaries, Lessig strengthens his argument by making it appear simpler than it truly is.
Occupations labeled as a profession tend to be specialized and require a depth of knowledge and understanding of the field. Criminals can also form a profession in a specific field such as murder, thievery, or bank robbery. As a professional thief, certain jobs can be specialized such as a professional pick pocket or conman. One such job is a professional boxman. A boxman is a thieve that specializes in cracking open safes through either torching, peeling, blowing, or punching (Chambliss & King, 2004, p. 14) the safe.
If someone stole a pencil from a store, no one would think twice about it, but if someone’s life was stolen, then it would engross people’s attention. In The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini, a boy named Amir discovers the aspects of life as he grows up with his father, Baba. During a discussion between the two, Baba tells Amir that the worst sin in the world is theft and that all other crimes are variations of theft. In “The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel, he argues that being indifferent is the worst sin that exists because he thinks that to be abandoned is worse than being punished. Although indifference makes people feel like they do not exist, theft is the greater sin because it is connected throughout all ways of life, because some crimes like killing and lying would be considered as theft.
In any school you have attended, plagiarism is a situation that a writer should not put themselves in under any circumstances. When reading the essay “Something Borrowed,” Malcolm Gladwell gave insight into the flaws of plagiarism that writers may not have thought about before. The first being that plagiarism is never acceptable (927). The second issue with plagiarism is recognizing the differences that can or cannot “inhibit creativity” (931). Being inspired by another person's work can help and guide you to build your own ideas, but simply taking their work and claiming it as yours is not permitted.
In the midst of it all, buccaneers and privateers are generally known as what they are, pirates. But, this hackneyed term is slightly ambiguous. What most people don’t know is that these three hundred year old beings appeared in different situations throughout the Golden Age of Piracy. Many of the pirates from this period lived in separate parts of the world, executing different assignments for different reasons. Although buccaneers and privateers were, in essence, pirates, they were inequivalent in terms of background, purpose, and operation.
After taking (In) English 102 I learned the difference between paraphrasing and plagiarism. After reading an article written by Brian Martin I wrote a research journal that (outlined) how his article helped me understand this distinction. In my article I wrote “After reading the article written by Brian Martin I learned how it is important to know the difference between paraphrasing and plagiarizing, while many people lack the to understand the difference between paraphrasing and plagiarizing Brian martin very easily draws a line and helps his readers to understand that why it is important for writers to know the difference and how they can avoid making such mistake, his discussion about how plagiarism should not be just limited on school levels
Internet piracy has been around as early as 1999 and has been growing bigger and bigger ever since. Recently this crime has become so large, that people in government positions are debating whether to persecute individuals who commit this offense. Research proves that prosecution should be enforced to whomever commits the felony of Internet piracy. The reasons include loss of money and loss of jobs. Which in all perspective hurts the economy overall.
Even though the movie is creative and all, he still used the clips from Disney’s movies without asking permission. It is used for a good use, like that sure could teach somebody about fair use and copyright. I think that he didn’t break copyright law. Disney’s movies go under fair use which Faden decided to use. He didn’t break the copyright law of plagiarism because he didn’t use 10% of disney 's movie.
There must not be theft, plagiarism and abuse of others. This digital era breaches intellectual information laws such as, copyright infringement and trademark abuse. Digital citizens need report illegal behaviour. (Brownell, n.d.) 7. Digital rights and
TELE 5330 – DATA NETWORKING ASSIGNMENT #2 Name: Prashanth Reddy Edunuri Grade (1) Most applications that use peer-to-peer communication also employs client server communication for some portion of functionality as decentralized peer-to-peer networks have numerous compensations over old-fashioned client-server networks. This system endorsed files to be questioned and shared between users, devoid of a central directory, and as a result shielded the network from lawful issues of individual users. By decentralizing resources, P2P networks have been able to virtually exclude expenses allied with a centralized infrastructure.
Now it 's time for Professor Faden to tell his side of the case he thinks his video is fair use over copyright and doesn 't think he should get sued over this. Faden’s movie he has made is fair use in many way. He never took the concept of the creator 's work. And is also non-infringing because his video is used for education. It’s used in education by teaching people about fair use, what can and cannot be fair use.