Analysis Of A Marble House Divided The Lincoln Memorials

hunter ellis due: 1/30/18 uw 1020 prof. mantler e1: coming to terms in scott a. sandage's essay "a marble House divided: the lincoln memorial, the civil rights movement, and the politics of memory, 1939-1963" he argues politics dramatically influence the public's memory and use of monuments. sandage articulates the way the public views history is subject to the political views of the time. his goal is to demonstrate how politics combined with public monuments can have a significant impact because of the memory Associated with the monuments. throughout his essay, sandage uses a case study of the lincoln memorial to fulfill this goal and provides the reader with a new way of thinking about public monuments. the materials, specifically the images,

further along in the paper, he begins to use images of political cartoons to demonstrate the controversy the civil rights movement's use of the lincoln memorial created. sandage explains that african-americans viewed lincoln differently than White americans, a fact that generated discord and lead to the political cartoons. finally, sandage uses images of the civil rights movement at the lincoln memorial to explain how the monument came to symbolize unity for the african-americans as they fought for their rights. additionally, the methods sandage employs help the reader to understand the significance of the lincoln memorial and the public's memory of it. throughout the paper, sandage uses storytelling to engage the reader and describe the history of the lincoln memorial and civil rights movement. in the opening paragraph, the author details the story of an eighth-grade boy in omega, virginia to demonstrate how southern states perceived lincoln. later he illustrates the story of marian anderson and how her performance at the lincoln memorial challenged preconceived notions about president