Analysis Of Argument With Philosopher Peter Singer

110 Words1 Page
Yes, I agree with philosopher Peter Singer. Committing murder is nothing less than allowing a fellow human being to die from hunger and starvation while you would have saved or aided him from the situation. Of course aiding a starving life comes with lots of inconveniences as well as sacrifices but as Philosopher Singer acknowledges, the rejection that you didn’t plan for someone to die while you were in a position to save is quite irrelevant. In fact when a person has no enough resources to enable him survive with dignity, those with more or rather plenty or those in stable position should legally and morally come to their
Open Document