Carl G. Herndl's The Unfortunate Earth

For every dollar China spends on its military, the U.S. spends $2.77 (www.nationalpriorities.org). My point is that if countries who have bad budget priorities are turned around then every child in every country could easily afford an education. Governments are not going to reallocate their funds to finance global education to make a positive change in the world because it is not in their best

Mao Zedong, one of the most influential leaders in Chinese history, once said that, “Of all the things in the world, people are the most precious.” One of the biggest problems that he faced was the growing population of China. At first, he discouraged birth control, but when the growth rate was growing astronomically, Mao introduced “Late, Long and Few.” When even this was not slowing down the population growth, China implemented a one-child policy. It allowed for the Chinese population to have one child, and was far more harmful than beneficial to China. Therefore, the one-child policy was not good for China and its people because it was unnecessary and was unfair to women. To begin with, the one-child policy now seems unnecessary.

It is a rare disease. We are live in China, China has one child policy, if you are one more child, and you need to pay higher cost fine to the government. Right now, the government wants to two children policy liberalization, it will increase maternal age, and increase rare children and birth defects in children with birth risk. For rare patients, some people think that they are a social burden; some people say

In 1949 Mao Zedong the ruling communist leader of China at the time called for couples to have more children because China was very poor at the time and thought it might bring more money to the government. In 1979 China started the one child policy to lower the population.

In addition there is the argument of judging a person morally and then denying them an education, and there is no easy answer for this question. Should a school be able to judge a person 's morals and does having questionable morals make you a unworthy student? Again there are no easy answers. As well being morally good or bad is a hard thing to distinguish even from one 's criminal record. In the article family spokesperson Najee Ali states “Everyone 's afraid of standing up for what 's morally right...People are afraid to hold people morally responsible.” This statement rings both true and false, it is not always true and at times should not even be considered as a factor because judging a person morals is a slippery slope that could lead to a culture of pretentiousness and falsehoods.

For example: Americans acknowledge that world hunger is a problem but the majority only acknowledge that it is a problem and do not try to fix it. For this reason, America’s biggest challenge is being able to unify its people to have the strength to deal with problems. This challenge is really hard to take on because of how diverse America is. Diversity is good, but not when it comes to trying to agree upon something with people who have completely opposing views. Racism is a good example of this.

As many state that refugees are a burden, there is a very good reason to believe that these refugees will contribute more to the world economically than they will yield from it. Countries are refraining from taking in these people because they feel it will ruin their economy, destabilize their society, degrade the

Obviously, it was a very shocking news or law or rule for the public because Mao Zedong, the senior leader of Chinese government between 1949 – 1976 believed in “More people, More power” (Zhang 142). This means that this policy was forced on the public of China. Let 's have a look at its outputs in various fields: Effect on Child Education It is hygienic that education becomes an easy approach for all the children because it will be easy to let their kid grab education for the couples who are economically poor and cannot afford the expenses of more than one children 's education. Additionally, the government can also be helpful for them to do so for one child. Becker says, “If families expect to have only one child, they may invest more in the human capital of the child”

Another reason is the that the government isn’t trustworthy in what they say about Climate Change, meaning what they say about Climate Change is wrong, and we should change our policy on Climate Change. To show the government is heading in the wrong direction we must make sure that we all know that Climate Change is caused by human activities. An article states, “Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree that human activity and reliance on fossil fuels is warming our planet. And whether you ‘believe’ the science or not, we will be all be suffering the impacts of climate change, even more so if Trump refuses to act during his presidency” (Schleeter, “3 Things Scott Pruitt Has Actually Said About Climate Change”).

When the American Congress passed these laws to curb Chinese immigration, the Chinese population in decreased from over 140,000 to 75,000. The Chinese family life became difficult, with husbands working in the Unites States, while wives and children stayed in China. Most Chinese Americans linked the divided and weakened China to the unfair treatment of Chinese people in America. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 was the first immigration law on the basis of race in American history. It set a precedent that unfair treatment of another race was alright in America.

The one-child policy helps children in China have a much better life. China’s population was the largest in the world and a very poor country at the same time. Still, the chairman called for people to have even more children. His advisors were against this decision. Finally, in 1980, the one-child policy was placed upon China (BE).

One law was the Interstate Commerce Act which helped to economically aid workers. This aided workers because railroads had to openly publish their rates, so their companies could not be charged more than they deserve to be charged. Prior to this law, railroads could charge large companies very little and small companies too much. Another way the industrial worker was affected by government actions was through the Chinese Exclusion Act, which affected the workers socially. This act outlawed all Chinese immigration to America for ten years, although it actually lasted until 1943.