Discuss, with the use of appropriate quotations, the effect on the reader of Cesaire’s alteration of Shakespeare’s The Tempest in his adaption A Tempest: paying particular attention to Cesaire’s characterisation of Prospero and Caliban, and to Cesaire’s changes to the plot of the ending of his play.
Cesaire employs Shakespeare’s The Tempest as a vehicle to voice his opinion on colonial discourse in an attempt to educate and inform his readers of black consciousness and Negretude in his adaption A Tempest. In his alteration Cesaire appropriates and explores the relationship between Prospero; the colonizer and his colonial subject; Caliban by adjusting their language and altering the plot of the ending of the original text. Thereby Cesaire’s Caliban becomes the voice of black consciousness: “a concrete (as opposed to just an abstract idea of freedom) coming to consciousness of identity, of what the blacks are- a race with great value and a history to proud to be proud of” (Fei 118) as opposed to Shakespeare’s Caliban; a mere “savage and deformed slave” (Cesaire xxxii). In Shakespeare’s The Tempest Prospero is seen as a “noble” (1.2 120) and all-knowing father with uplifting characteristics that endows him the power to control nature (Fei 119). In both plays Prospero takes the moral high-ground and ignorantly believes that he has saved Caliban by teaching him their “language” (1.2 362), noting “what would you be without me?” (Cesaire 17). In the original text Caliban is
Prospero constantly claims that Caliban is incapable of doing anything right and is only capable of committing malicious acts. In the text, Shakespeare states, “Which any print of goodness wilt not take, being capable of all ill.” This statement further emphasizes Prospero’s revulsion towards Caliban. They have both endured neglection and verbal abuse throughout their lifetimes, which has led them to commit wrongful acts of violence upon
Othello: A Close Reading This is an analysis of the lines 260-279 of the third scene of the third act of Shakespeare’s Othello. In an attempt to fulfill the incessant need for comfortable dichotomies, societies tend to be divided into two groups: the ‘in-crowd’ and the ‘others’. These strict dualities, constructed upon the inherent need for adversaries, are often as arbitrary as they are false and based on nothing but fear.
Caliban is not only a slave to Prospero but to envy and concupiscence, which has turned his once human lifestyle into a quest to seek revenge. His monstrous nature broke out when he “didst seek to violate the honor of Miranda” (1.2-16 Shakespeare). After Caliban’s endeavor to ravish Miranda his true dark heart was revealed even further when he expresses “would it had been done! Thou didst prevent me; I had peopled else, this isle with Caliban’s” (1.2-320) this shows that he has no contriteness for his unconsented sexual endeavors with Miranda. Caliban’s savage composed nature cannot be transmuted, but only tamed by his master.
1- What makes Miranda a central character in the play? What process must she undergo? What virtues does she possess that make success likely? Miranda is a hero “The Tempest.”
In addition to Caliban, Prospero's yearning for vengeance also creates internal issues for himself. After Ferdinand and Miranda announce their marriage, Prospero claims his "rejoicing / At nothing can be more," because he must "perform / Much business appertaining," (Shakespeare, 95-99). Usually, a father focuses more on his daughter getting married, however Prospero can only focus on his plans for vengeance. Some believe that the characters internal struggles were caused by the wrongdoers, and not a lack of forgiveness; however, at the end of the play, after Prospero becomes a more virtuous character, his conflicts with his brother and Caliban are resolved, clearly showing that their focus on vengeance is what caused the internal struggles.
Both characters are considered as rebellious savages that are controlled, Caliban by Prospero and John by the World State. The Tempest can be interpreted as a play about colonialism because when Prospero arrived at the island, he imposed his own rules and put Caliban under slavery, just as Europeans when they took possession of the lands of Americans and enslaved them. From this point of view, Prospero and the World State are very similar because they both use their power to control over people and to preserve their own stability (Prospero using his magic and the World State using soma).
Shakespeare presents Macbeth in a determined yet conceited tone to express the contrast of his characteristic from the beginning to the end. Therefore, Shakespeare depicts the change
(1.2.191-193) reinforces Cesaire’s post-colonial perspective and his endorsement of negritude. Caliban finds himself continuously ill-treated; he has it the worst of all of Prospero’s slaves. The conditions of hard-labour that were subjected to black people by white supercilious people during colonization are mentioned by Cesaire were Prospero “forgives” Ferdinand and excuses him from his afore imposed state of slavery on the basis that they are of the same race and rank and the manual labour that was intended for Ferdinand is passed on to Caliban. Caliban is naïve and gullible, he trusts Stephano and Trinculo upon meeting them for the first time in spite of the ordeal he undergoes with Prospero. Caliban’s woes are echoed throughout the play and draws sympathy from the reader, whereas in “The Tempest” Shakespeare makes it difficult for the audience to consider Caliban as anything further then the perpetrator
The Tempest can be seen as a play about reconciliation, forgiveness, and mercy. However, while it is clear that the theme of forgiveness is at the heart of the drama, it is unclear to what extent mercy is given. An examination of Caliban and Ariel and their representations of Prospero’s struggle illustrates that there is little, if any, true forgiveness and reconciliation in The Tempest. Prospero’s actions from the beginning of the play seem to contradict his ultimate aim to forgive those of have wronged him. Prospero seizes the opportunity for revenge with the help of his magic and good fortune.
Pursuing this power dynamic further, another one of Prospero’s servants, Caliban, receives treatment identical to Ariel’s. When Prospero arrived to the island Caliban was one of the native settlers. Prospero did not see him as peaceful, but rather a brute, monstrous foreigner that could not communicate with his new neighbors, resulting in Prospero teaching Caliban their language in order to assimilate him to the island’s new tongue. Expectedly, Prospero does not let this kind gesture go unpaid, so he requires Caliban to enter into servitude in order to repay him for the language he learned. Much like Ariel’s experience, Prospero’s used his strict guidelines to control Caliban: lowering self-esteem, reminding of his past, and recalling generosity.
The Tempest is a captivating play that follows the afternoon of a wizard and his revenge plot against diplomats that banished him to a deserted island with his daughter. The themes nature and nurture are compared and contrasted in order to explain the various behaviors presented by each character. According to the theme of nature in The Tempest, people and things are categorized as either naturally good or bad. It is believed that bad nature should be controlled. Nurture is also predominantly displayed in the play through Caliban and Prospero.
Caliban was being dehumanized. Caliban was a symbol that stood for the countless victims of European imperialism and colonization. Like Caliban, the colonized people were disinherited, exploited, and subjugated. Caliban was used by Shakespeare as an example that was socially relevant to the ongoing colonization of other areas from
1. ‘I’ll wrack thee with old cramps, / Fill all thy bones with aches, make thee roar, / That beasts shall tremble at thy din.’ (1.2.372-74) Interrogate the representation of violence in The Tempest.
As the play begins, it seems as if the massive tempest is simply a random occurrence, catching the mariners and nobility by chance. However, as the act continues, Shakespeare reveals that the tempest was actually the work of Prospero and his ghostly servant Ariel, who stirred up the seas and set fire to the masts (1.2, 193-194). This establishes Prospero as the executor of a mess of ‘coincidences’ ranging from Ferdinand stumbling upon his daughter Miranda to King Alonso and his party walking directly into the former duke’s cell. Though Prospero may have the same control over the English language as the other characters, Caliban points to his specific source of power. He says, “… for without [his books] /
In comparison, the inconsistency between diction depicts the power dynamics observed in the play. Shakespeare often uses Prospero’s servant, Ariel and slave, Caliban to portray the differences in the hierarchy of the play. As observed by the audience Prospero often uses threats and insults to communicate and assign task to Caliban, hence “...tonight thou shalt have cramps, side stitches that shall pen thy breath up. ”(I.ii.325-326) Prospero threatens Caliban with pain after his refusal to do work, because he feels as if the isle belongs to him due to the fact that it was inhabited by his mother first.