CHEATING AT CRICKET- RESPONSE Following the ball-tampering debacle with the Australian men’s cricket team in South Africa; The Age Newspaper’s economics editor, Ross Gittins explores the issue in his opinion article, “Cheating at cricket just one of the unthinkable things Aussies do now” (27 march 2018). Gittins contends that Australia’s ball tampering incident is only one of the issues facing the nation and there are more pressing issues. The author addresses his audience of the Australian public in a concerned, critical and ashamed tone. In an attempt to set the tone for his opinion article, the author strategically places an illustration by Simon Letch at the beginning of the article. Letch’s use of proportion draws the audience’s attention …show more content…
The author uses patriotism as a technique when stating, “There was a time when it would have been unthinkable for Australians to stand by while an elected government physically and psychologically mistreated people whose only crime was to arrive by boat without an invite.” By criticising his target audience, he appeals to their sense of patriotism in a pursuit to make them feel guilty. This argument is connected to Letch’s illustration in the top left corner, which features a figure holding a sign, which reads ‘GO BACK’. Gittins provided his target audience with a visual reference on his argument by showing Australia as the villain with a frowning and disapproving facial expression and the refugee looking upset sitting in a puddle of water with his head down. In relation to the mistreatment of welfare precipitants, the author uses the technique of mocking when he referred to the Australian Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull as “Mr Harbourside Mansion” to provide a preliminary opinion before stating his argument. By making the Mr Turnbull less relatable to his target audience, Gittins has placed his reader in a position where they are more likely to support his criticism of the government. Letch’s illustration also reflects this argument by having Malcolm Turnbull or the government search the empty of pockets of welfare recipients (figure on the ground), providing a visual representation of his argument to his target
In this book,"The Cricket in Times Square",Mario Bellini and his poor family own a newsstand in the Times Square subway station in New York City. But one day Mario takes a late shift on a Saturday during then he hears a noise he would not hear in New York City , so he follows it. As he does, he finds a cricket he dusts it off puts it in a match box and takes it to the newsstand. He and mama Bellini argues until mama bellini says
In this day and age, many believe racism to be an issue of the past, when as a matter of fact, it is still frequently impacting peoples lives all around the globe. Unfortunately, many issues regarding racism occur in the sporting world. In Australia, it occurs most often in Australian Rules Football, or in the major competition, AFL (Australian Football League). It is a widely accepted idea that the players and spectators of a sport, rather than the sport itself have a direct impact of inducing racism within that particular sport. Relating to the AFL, the main offenders of racism are the spectators, who are commonly abusing players of different race to them.
The nation (Australia) is constantly looking for a person/group of people to follow. The underprivileged are stuck in the midst and subsequently, they feel a sense of inequality. Noonuccal accentuates the auditory effect of the underprivileged, in an attempt to evoke a depressing or compassionate feeling towards them from the reader through the use of imagery in the ‘underprivileged call’. The use of personification in ‘unfriendly doors’ displays how the statesman can force the ‘unfriendly doors’ to groups of people in which he dislikes, which shows how mean and unfriendly Australians can be.
Described as “Australia’s Martin Luther King moment” Stan Grant as part of the IQ2 debate series attempted to confirm the legitimacy of that “Racism is destroying the Australian Dream”. Grant pronounced that racism was not only eroding the Australian dream, but lay at its very foundation. Beginning his speech, Grant references the recent controversy involving former AFL player Adam Goodes and the racist butchery which lead to his eventual retirement. Grant talks inclusively about the incident inciting that "When we heard those boos, we heard a sound that was very familiar to us ...
The individual sport games from a broader perspective and the tennis matches especially —given their characteristics—impose constraints on the player’s behavior, constraints in relation to which some actions tend to produce good and other actions harm or at least lesser amounts of good (Badminton World Federation, 2012, pp. 2-3). Many analysts ventured to tell us how we ought to act in sport, unfortunately, before analyzing the practice (and thus the uniquely constrained context) in which all these normative actions are to take place. Therefore, in the last decades there was a lot of discussion whether certain behavior should be considered Fair Play (Simon, Torres, Hager, 2015). The dominant paradigm on ethical behavior presented in 1986 by
The descriptive language, “cheap, exotic food” even tries to ridicule the cultural food which migrants were expected to prepare for the Australians. “Cheap, exotic food” is a connotation for unsatisfactory food. “Feed the mainstream”, hints that regardless of a migrant’s new identity, they were still considered as different from the majority. The quote, “We’ve given you opportunity for family reunion, equality, and status, though your colour could be wrong” uses racial imagery to create a picture in the audience’s mind of the “incorrect” coloured Australians. This statement maintains the concept of migrants never being able to be fully considered Australian.
Australia has been labelled as the country of mateship, fair-go and tolerance, but the mistreatment of Asylum seekers in Australia denies these values. In our anthem we sing “For those who’ve come across the seas, we’ve boundless plains to share”. It ironic isn’t it? As when Asylum seekers arrive in Australia we do not offer a hand of mateship instead we use punitive matters such as sending them to mandatory detention, which shows how xenophobia is manifested in Australia (Ariyawansa,
In Australia, refugees and asylum seekers are treated like the enemy in a war: the target of a highly resourced, military-led “deterrence” strategy complete with arbitrary detainment, detention camps, guards to terrorise them, forced deportations and the violent suppression of those who protest. Australia is failing to meet the standards required when regarding the treatment of asylum seekers. It is fact that asylum seekers make up less than 3% of Australia’s annual immigration yet the idea is being distorted to that of which they will overpopulate a country that prides itself on being a multicultural society. I want to shed light on the misconception that asylum seekers are not ‘legal’ when in actual fact it is a human right to seek freedom.
During the next 20 years’ Australian citizens grew to consider themselves separate from ‘Mother Country’ making Australia a nation in its own right. This line of thought lead to people questioning if it was still acceptable to give everything they had for Britain. In particular, was it sensible to join a war no matter what the cost to
But this applies to only those who resort to cheating ways. Sports persons always hit the headlines for a lot of controversies like using drugs, playing for two clubs, abusing the fans of other countries or clubs or inappropriate behaviour in the field or breaking the code of conduct and so on and so forth. The problem does not stop here; the sports medicine which the players take is also causing serious debates and discussion. Issues like faking injury, losing intentionally to get a stronger opponent and failing the gender test had also surfaced in the
In 2012 London Olympic, a fencing player got stolen her medal because of judges’ wrong decision. In Quater-Final of woman’s epee(fencing), Sin A-ram, who is a Korean fencing player seized the chance to victory from German player, Heidegger, and she got advantage that if she defend opponent’s attack for one minute, or made attack at same time, she could go final. She defended for 56 seconds, and there’re only 4 seconds left. In 4 seconds, there was fierce battle, and time’s over, Sin A-ram took off her mask and audience yelled out a cheer. However, referee reversed a decision, and gave Heidegger one second back, but it was too short to make attack.
Cheating in school and sports are considered very unethical and controversial. The articles explain the downside, and the negative effects of cheating. The sources used for credible information are from an Associate Dean of Education at the University of Florida and a professor at Arizona State University. The sources helped formulate the opinion that cheating educational and sports wise is unacceptable.
SUMMARY OF CURRENT SECURITY SITUATION IN SOUTH AFRICA Cricket Australia (CA) announced in October 2015 that it had been forced to postpone the two-Test Tour of Bangladesh, due to concerns about the safety and security of the Australian team. Chief executive James Sutherland said in an interview “that recent advice at the time from ASIO, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) and CA’s head of security about an increasing security risk for the Australian team in Bangladesh meant that matches could not proceed”. An independent security assessment that was conducted confirmed a risk of terrorism in Bangladesh which could result in the targeting of Australian nationals. As the CA’s national team is preparing for their South African Tour in 2016 an unclassified summary will be made that will include: 1. A review and a brief outline of the current security situations in South Africa and, 2.
“Who cheats? Well, just about anyone, if the stakes are right. You might say to yourself, I don’t cheat regardless of the stakes. And then you might remember the time you cheated on a board game.
Cheating is earning a prize for capacity or discovering a simple way out of an unsavory circumstance by unscrupulous means. It is for the most part utilized for the breaking of guidelines to increase uncalled for point of interest in a focused circumstance and is commonly depending on self-conscience and moral code "why we cheat" by Ferric C. Tooth And Arturo Casadevall is a article that discusses individuals who surpass their life hindrances by doing what it takes as the cyclist Lance Armstrong did to gain his seven titles. Duping is not constrained to people; it has been archived all through the living scene, wherever there is rivalry for restricted assets. Exploitative experimental examination can mislead different specialists, lead to misinformed