The Codes of the Street The world in which we live in is full of violence; impersonal or interpersonal. As a matter of actuality, interpersonal violence is said to inflict havoc every single day to many members of the society. In the article Code of the Streets, written by Elijah Anderson, the daily norms of a certain inner city neighborhood can reinforce the use of violence in one’s social relationships. Additionally, simply living in those neighborhoods puts young people at risk of being affiliated with aggressive behavior. According to Anderson, the “code” is a set of unofficial rules that informs and influences an individual’s interpersonal behavior in inner city neighborhoods. They are the informal rules that guides one’s response when confronted with aggressive or criminal behavior. In the core of the code lies respect—which must be earned, easily-lost and must be guarded. Anderson believes that there are two types of families; the “decent” families—who …show more content…
Therefore, many youths fall victim of becoming aggressive and engaging in criminal behavior just by residing in those troubled neighborhoods. He goes on to assert that the strive for “respect”—or being treated “right”—induces violence and criminal behavior in the society. And according to Anderson, this is true because some alienated members of the society, who believe that they have no positive or dignified position in the mainstream are still convinced that they deserved some sort of personal ‘respect’. So, those people show and display “nerve”, devising and exercising rules in violation of mainstream norms so that they can gain respect. In effect, when one abides by the ‘code’ and manifests ‘nerve’—so that people don’t mess with him/her—the end result, if successful is the
Violence is a terrible thing, but is also essential in life. Without violence, there would be no such thing as reality, and no such person a real person. We walk in a world of two types of people: real and unreal. The real people have seen and experienced violence. They no longer see the world through eyes that see the wonderful and the paradise, but rather through eyes that “might never see it right again.
He chose to focus on drug dealing world because it ultimately manifested as the pathos of the US inner city, an articulated response to poverty and segregation. The pathos of the inner city was embodied by the dealers and the addicts that Bourgois chose to focus on, thus enabling him to gain insight into processes that lay at the heart of East Harlem’s street culture. (11) Bourgois has essentially presented an alternative critical understanding of the U.S inner city by formulating an argument that focuses on the lives and conversations of crack dealers in order to expose and emphasise the interaction between structural oppression and individual action. He achieved this by considering cultural and structural forces, both within the manstream
“The ‘civilizing instinct’ of a man urging him to behave lawfully, follow rules, act morally and the feral instinct inciting him to act brutally, become violent and a selfish breaker of rules run parallel in this novel”(Muhammad Ramzan). Humans have evolved to attain a brain capacity that can decipher right from wrong. In other words, we have the wondrous ability to rationalize. It sets us apart from being “savages” or “animals”. Over a period of time man has created a society that is dedicated to sorting out what is and is not socially acceptable.
Young teens are very vulnerable and insecure, some figure out how to deal with this reasonably and others tend to stray. Teens who are involved in criminal violence are often misguided and just need help to get on the right path. For many though “We see them as wayward youths, as kids gone wrong”, but when in reality they “are nonetheless not ‘bad.’ This image is of the teen as a victim. They are misguided, immature, insufficiently socialized, but not evil.”
There are no universal norms, every society has its own set of values, some may overlap but none are the same, otherwise the two cultures would be the same. The “street” culture is a great example of how a culture’s have different norms. Reading this from a perspective of the mainstream it is easy to see that norms of the “street” such as of physical altercations to gain respect, theft in order to gain status “one way of campaigning for status is by taking the possessions of others,” (107) and abusive language, are not norms of mainstream
33). The code of the street emerges when the influence of formal guardianship, such as police, disappears and people begin to feel a sense of personal responsibility for their own safety. When we think about the amount of violence these people experience or witness, it would make since that a sort of fight or flight reflex would kick in. In this case, the residents seem to choose to fight, mostly because they are lacking the ability to get away from their
The mass media and many other people have attempted to define the problems of inner city ghettos in terms of American racism and brutal police tactics; however, according to Sociologist Victor Rios in his book Punished Policing the Lives of Black and Latino Boys, the inner city ghettos exist in many of American’s largest cities and are a vicious web of concentrated poverty, disconnected youth, and a culture of gang violence. Adding to these incorrigible conditions, are the punitive social controls used by the police, politicians, school officials, mass media, businesses, and families that prioritize racial profiling and violent control. The reality of the inner city culture is extremely genuine with an arrangement of norms, values and habits
Life’s what you make it Can you imagine not being able to choose whether or not you want to be a part of a life filled with violence? Some people are just sucked into it because of choices other people make. For instance, Geoffrey Canada’s mom moved him & his three brothers into to the south Bronx where the journey of violence then began. In the memoir Fist Stick Knife Gun the narrator Geoffrey Canada goes through a series of events that eventually influences him to become the man he is today. Geoffrey Continues to reflect on his experiences and shows how he learned from them being that he grew up very poorly compared to an average kid in a rough neighborhood in the south Bronx where he went through a number of life-changing or eye
Seifert shows that people resort to violent measures simply as a coping mechanism. This capacity for evil and cruelty is within everyone, for it is an elemental factor of human nature that has kept us alive. However, this side of human nature doesn’t necessarily have to surface until it becomes one’s last resort. A lack of guidance strips away much of a child’s innocence, leaving them with
Randall Collin's (2009) micro-sociological theory of violence can be employed. According to this theory, violence is successful when antagonists overcome the barrier of confrontational tension/fear. This essay focuses on the role of situational and emotional dynamics that caused the violence event to occur. The essential thesis of the essay is to fit the police violence into the framework of Collin’s theory. This leads to the discussion of the theory of the “tunnel of violence”, where actual violence involves dominating the emotional attention space and the attacker enters an altered state of consciousness (Collins, 2013).
It is assumed that a child will have seen their fair share of violence while young, but a loving parent’s touch will hopefully dull down any negative influence. But, during adolescence, the frequency of violence is easier to witness, and worse, commit. Antisocial and aggressive behaviors begin developing as early as preschool and elementary school. The coercion theory suggests that children who become juveniles happens when they are influenced by outer sources, like peer pressure and television.
According the article “Preventing Urban Violence to Save Lives and Foster Healthy Communities” by Rachel A. Davis shows people should quality the violence of the city, also to rescue people’s lives and to breed a healthy community. The author’s purpose is how to prevent and reduce violence. Rachel uses some examples and datum to support her main ideas. The purpose is to prove how much violence the harm to society. She refers to reliable outside sources that is US Burean of Justice Statistics instructions, and up to 1.3 million people become the victim who are age between the 12 to 24 years old in 2010.
City of Thieves – David Benioff How has David Benioff explored the dehumanising aspects of war in his novel? City of Thieves is historical fiction set in the besieged Russian city of Leningrad during World War Two. Lev Beniov, a Jewish seventeen year old, details his story as the protagonist through his first person narrative perspective of the siege. Benioff’s focus is the desensitized attitudes and behaviour shared by characters throughout the novel as they contend with dehumanising situations which would appear horrifying under circumstances that have been unaffected by war. Through the utilisation of techniques such as characterisation, plot and first person narrative, Benioff explores the dehumanising aspects of war in his novel.
This is what it was like for elementary student, Chayzée Smith, except worse. Usually, Chayzée would leave quickly and run home as fast as he could, sometimes though, he would try to take a chance, and stay for basketball or table tennis at the school, but “the violence of the neighborhood always found its way into the after school program” (Smith). That was the other problem. His neighborhood was a rough one, always being involved in drugs or violence.
To gain an understanding of the inevitability of violence at a state level it is imperative to investigate historical and present causes of violence. It remains clear that violence forms part of the primitive nature of mankind, as defined by Freud ( 1961) mankind are “creatures among whose instinctual endowments is to be reckoned a powerful share of aggressiveness”. Although there are many different theories on the causes of violence the root of it comes back to fear, retribution or narcissism. Violence being an inevitable feature of human relationships stands difficult to confirm or dismiss.