Remedies to Breach of Contract
Contract Law
Nayona Banerjee
BA Economics Honours
Abstract
The history of the Indian Contract Act,1972, reflects the origin of economic possession in olden era and hence the importance of contract to conduct one’s business. The earlier system that existed in the older times was that of barter system which was built on the same principle. The concept still finds existence in the present world, where it can be found in commercial and economical vies underdeveloped and developed areas. However, the relevancy of such a system in modern times is questioned due to complicated nature of the economic systems as well as the increasing market conditions due to the change in the wants and needs
…show more content…
But when there exists a situation of asymmetric information, it arises issues in the contract law and hence makes it inefficient.
To analyze this, Ayres and Talley( 1995) employ game theory to argue that bargaining costs are lower under the liability rules. But criticising them, Kaplow( 1995) argues that in many contracts bargaining is impossible or costly,. Hence the liability rules that dominate the property rules do not lead to lower bargaining
…show more content…
(n.d.). Contract Remedies: General. Contract Law and Economics.
• Bebchuk, L., & Png, I. (n.d.). Damage measures for inadvertant breach of contract. International Review of Law and Economics, 319-331.
• Saini, S. (2014). Damages Under Law of Contract: A Remedy or Penalty. 3(11).
• Mcchesney, Fred S. "Tortious Interference with Contract versus "Efficient" Breach: Theory and Empirical Evidence." The Journal of Legal Studies: 131.
• Shavell, Steven (1980), ‘Damage Measures for Breach of Contract’, 11 Bell Journal of Economics,466-490.
• Ayres, Ian and Talley, Eric L. (1995), ‘Solomonic Bargaining: Dividing a Legal Entitlement To Faciliate Coasean Trade’, 104 Yale Law Journal, 1027-1117.
• Barton, John H. (1972), ‘The Economic Basis of Damages for Breach of Contract, 1 Journal of Legal Studies, 277-304.
• Patil, BS. Building and Engineering Contracts. 5th ed. Pune, Maharashtra: Saish, 1972.
• Kaplow, Louis and Shavell, Steven (1995), ‘Do Liability Rules Facilitate Bargaining? A Reply to Ayres and Talley’, 105 Yale Law Journal
Part 4: Source and Summary • My search on Westlaw led me to 24 Mich. Civ. Jur. Torts § 7.
This essay will be organized by answering the questions in chronological order; to which in the first question, I will be looking heavily into the case of R.v. Saulte Ste. Marie and Roach. It will incorporate the regulatory offences and the mental blameworthiness and how strict liability acts as a balance between the two. It will also include the defence of due diligence.
Thank you for providing a great example of an institution’s response to the breach of a coach’s contract. After researching the case of Kent State v. Ford, it was apparent that the terms of Ford’s agreement were not interpreted by the coach in the same manner in which the terms were written by the institution. Ford is quoted as stating that the liquidated damages clause was not enforceable (Farkas, 2015). Whereas liquated damages are defined as such: The purpose of a liquidated damages clause is to ensure that the failure of one party to follow the contract does not unfairly hurt the other and the amount agreed to must be a reasonable estimate of any potential damage a breach of contract might cause (faircontracts.org, n.d.).
Based on tort principles in the contract law, damages caused by an employee
Breach of Contract / Intentional infliction of emotional distress, for prima facie tort Tortuous Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing5. The Plaintiff offered a Settlement which seems to have been accepted with consideration. If this offer/ acceptance/ consideration is considered a contract it was violated. If the Jury does not consider this Settlement Offer a Contract it still indicates the worth of the property taken without due process and the Defamtion. 5.
“ The available sources of public may vary from case to case and there may be many statutory remedies that are preempted to relate common law tort actions. The damages that are indicated in this case falls under wrongful termination do not suffer from the same caps as some of the statutory claims and the statues of limitations fall in terms of years instead of days. Nevertheless, some plaintiffs can strategically benefit from common law or the state federal law (Oswald & Vogelsang,
Q1: List the Parties involved in the Hormel negotiations. What are the primary goals/interests of each party? Briefly describe two pairs of parties that are in conflict with each other and explain why they are in conflict.
Conseco Grp. Risk Mgmt. Co. v. Ahrens Fin. Sys., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2306, at *1. Ultimately, the Court held that in matters involving public concern, whether private or public figure, a plaintiff was required to show actual malice in order to recover presumed or punitive damages.
The gross neglect of KBR Inc. to prove and provide that the reimbursement costs are reasonable must be explained in detail due to the nature of the contract. A practical business person would have declined or negotiated the new proposal in a different way. Since the excessive charges were not questioned by KBR, the request for the reimbursement cost should be denied due to lack of supplemental data. I find the outcome of the dispute
In Tunkl, it identified six factors (well-known as Tunkl factors), in this case, to analyzing by using Tunkl factors could find that may be relevant given the factual circumstance of the case and current social expectations, such as this case violated third and fifth factors “The party holds himself out as willing to perform this service for any member of the public who seeks it, or at least for any member coming within certain established standards.”, “In exercising a superior bargaining power the party confronts the public with a standardized adhesion contract of exculpation, and makes no provision whereby a purchaser may pay additional reasonable fees and obtain protection against negligence.” (Tobriner, 1964), as a next step I will explain the reason of violation of Tunkl
Deals Co. v. Mainland Motors Corp., 40 Mich. Application. 270, 198 N.W.2d 757 (1972) (defendant corporation which allegedly did not honor agreement had burden of raising statute of frauds
ASSESSMENT TWO A. ISSUES Given that Emma relied on information from the wrong page of the brochure while entering into an agreement with Richard, is the contract affected (whether valid, void or voidable) by the mistake of facts? Is the promise by George to let off Richard from paying the rent increase in the following year valid and enforceable despite the express provision in the lease? What was the effect of Richard’s counter-offer to the offer made by Tom to purchase the car at $18500?
Although the Criminal Justice system is supposed to protect and help the community through its services, not all groups in society have proportionate access to these services. It is particularly the minority groups that suffer these consequences due to their race, class, or gender. A such matter that these groups are subjective to is the plea-bargaining process. While the plea-bargaining process is supposed to help the system, it begins to cause more problems for the public. A plea bargain occurs when the defendant of a crime and the prosecutor create a deal in which the defendant accepts to plead guilty in exchange for a more lenient sentence.
As sellers in this system aim to maximize profit, they will find ways to make production efficient and cost low. And because the buyers are willing to pay for the services and products that they
Sandel, Michael J. (2009). Justice: What’s the right thing to do? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Introduction & Background Information In the book, Justice: