Analysis Of D. H Lawrence's Women In Love

1746 Words7 Pages
H Lawrence’s Concept of Fury
D.H Lawrence’s Women in Love (1920) significantly reworks Nietzsche’s central concept of the will to power. Lawrence saw modern literature as a mode of representing the ‘fluidity’ in life in a way that could counteract the rigid discourses of philosophy and religion (McManus). According to McManus, Lawrence’s point of view, the conflict between man and woman arises from the civilized woman’s having become the desperate antagonist of man, drawing from “his greatest possession- his manhood, his masculinity- and feminizing him (MacManus).” and bringing him under the control of her will. In Aoron’s Rod, Lawrence makes one of the characters say, speaking of women in general
“I hate her, when she knows, and when she wills. I hate her when she will make of me that which serves her desire. She may love me she may be soft and kind to me, she may give her life to me. But why? Only because I am hers (Lawrence 337)”. This exposes the anti-feminine passion and the fury against women tyranny.
The Portrait of D.H Lawrence in Rupert Birkin
In Women in Love, in the Character of Rupert Birkin one sees Lawrence of 1916, amid the poverty and misery of his life in Cornwall, and in his mind always the horror of the war and the nightmare of suspicion and persecution. He explains this through the character of Birkin “Mankind is a dead tree, covered with fine, brilliant galls of people, the dying organic forms of social mankind, their hypocrisies, their rottenness, the
Open Document