Analysis Of In Our Names By Lesly K Gunter
“In Our Names”: Rewriting the US Death Penalty by Kimberly K. Gunter theorizes that the idea of who deserves the death penalty is largely dictated by external factors including literacy, socioeconomic status, education, and exposure making certain classes and groups of people more prone to receive the death penalty. I theorize that the death penalty is biased leaving certain people and classes of people more likely to receive a sentence of death and that the sentence of death should be based on a more algorithmic method that factors in the same elements for each person to be placed on death row. “In Our Names”:Rewriting the US Death Penalty by Kimberly K. Gunter contrasts the US death penalty to different levels of creative/freestyle …show more content…
This is seen in the article where she states “ we remind ourselves that literacy isn’t just a storehouse of knowledge but a kind of action and that dis-course isn’t printed in text alone , but also a way of being in the world, the ideological nature of all discourse is apparent moreover if we look at literacy as a social action but it is a social call to action. (Gunter, K) Ethos is used as a means of convincing an audience via the authority or credibility of the persuader, be it a notable or experienced figure in the field or even a popular celebrity. (Examples of Ethos, Logos, and …show more content…
The article goes on to state that as part of the course work people from outside the class are interviewed and their viewpoints of the American death penalty heard and recorded. Pro death penalty and anti death penalty viewpoints were heard from attorneys, correction officers, psychologists, theology scholars, and ministers. Gunter states that she and her students “abandoned the insinuation of academia as an ivory tower and took to the streets which was essential to the scrutiny of the American death penalty.” *5 People from all races, socioeconomic statuses, and educational backgrounds were interviewed. There were as many different opinions as there were interviewees. Attorneys from both sides of the capital punishment debate were interviewed with one stating “If you are going to kill somebody in the country, don’t be poor.” *6 This opinion was promptly opposed by an Assistant District Attorney who went on to describe the crimes that those on death row had committed. The more people that were interviewed and surveyed the more they began to realize that the American death penalty was filled with
Edward Koch Ethos
322 Words | 2 PagesThe death penalty has been one of the most controversial debates in the United States. Some believe that an eye for an eye is an effective mean of punishment while others believe that such mean of punishment is not effective in modern society. Edward Koch believes the death penalty affirms the sanctity of life. In the article by Edward Koch, published in The New Republic, “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life,’ he utilizes the rhetorical devices of ethos, pathos and logos to justify his position for the death penalty towards the people opposing the death penalty.
Mccleskey V. Kemp Case Study
964 Words | 4 PagesPrimary Annotated Bibliography McCleskey v Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987) McCleskey v Kemp is a Supreme Court case that highlighted racism in the death penalty process. The petitioner in the case provided a controversial statistical study that correlated racism in death penalty sentencings. The Supreme Court Justices were asked to answer the question of whether or not the statistical study provided could substantiate that the sentence in the case violated the petitioner’s eighth and fourteenth amendment rights. This case will be the main focus of my research paper.
Summary Of The Sentencing Reform Act Of 1984
461 Words | 2 PagesHe claims the prejudices of the judicial system handed out mandatory sentencing for those who used their constitutional right to have a trial by jury. The author builds a relationship with the audience by using Pathos in order to compel them to recognize the urgency to change the current law. Girault explains the failing logic of the law on page 225, he states that communities were to be made safer and instead of targeting petty crimes the focus would be to bring down kingpins, however after three decades of the SRA it still was a failure. Girault defines the sentencing reform act as discriminatory and states that minorities are hugely effected by this law and states ”Black people are overwhelming charged, convicted and sentenced at a higher rate to federal crimes since the passage of the Sentencing Reform Act.” (Girault 228).
Christopher Lee Simmons Essay
1302 Words | 6 PagesAmerican society has always wrestled with the concept and ethics of capital punishment. Despite the meticulous process involved when convicting someone, there are many questions and exceptions about who qualifies and the process in and of itself, as to be expected when dealing with something so profound and permanent. What if the accused is mentally ill? What if the perpetrator committed the crime when defending someone else? What if the convicted is innocent, but still put to death?
Summary Of Starving For Wisdom By Nicholas Kristof
1091 Words | 5 PagesEthos is the “way of convincing your audience of your credibility as a writer” (Modes of Persuasion). Kristof makes a reference to the novel “In Defense of a Liberal Education” by Fareed Zakaria. Zakaria’s novel defends the liberal arts by explaining how this degree creates critical thinkers. Students develop critical thoughts by learning how to write and formulate their own opinions. These skills are utilized in every job.
Death Penalty In Helen Prejean's Dead Man Walking
2267 Words | 10 PagesSince 1977, the majority of death row inmates in the United States have been executed for killing white people. Yet, studies have shown that African Americans make up almost half of all homicides victims. For this reason, for years, capital punishment has been a source of a lot of controversy among human rights advocates and the american government. The book Dead Man Walking depicts the journey of a nun, Sister Helen Prejean, against the biased judicial system in the United States. Focusing in the death penalty issue, Prejean share her deepest thoughts while she experiences being the spiritual adviser of a “dead man walking”, a man convicted to death.
Does The Death Penalty Violate The 8th Amendment
405 Words | 2 PagesThe death penalty has been significantly changing according to these six cases: Atkins v. Virginia (2002), Roper v. Simmons (2002), Kennedy v. Louisiana (2008), Graham v. Florida (2010), and Miller v. Alabama (2012). These six cases discuss the “evolving standards of decency”. The “evolving standards of decency” state that the implementation of the death penalty is deemed unconstitutional for certain circumstances, defendants, and crimes. When implementing this test, the courts analyze the most prevalent opinions among the different state legislatures, judges, sentencing juries, and the general public in order to determine whether the use of the death penalty is cruel and unusual.
Death Penalty: Francis V. Resweber
1653 Words | 7 PagesResearch Paper: Capital Punishment Capital punishment is one of the most controversial and talked-about topics in the United States today. It is an issue that is not explicitly mentioned in our constitution, so states have been left to interpret the law. As of April 2017, 32 states in the US legally allow the death penalty. Of the 18 states that have banned it, the most recent was Maryland in 2013. The topic is so controversial that the Supreme Court has gotten involved many times, deciding on more cases that have to do with capital punishment than most other subjects.
Walter Berns Arguments Against The Death Penalty
1788 Words | 8 PagesThe United States remains in the minority of nations in the world that still uses death as penalty for certain crimes. Capital punishment is seen by many as barbaric and against American values, while others see it as a very important tool in fighting violent pre-meditated murder. One of the supporters of the Death penalty was a man named Walter Berns (a professor of American constitutional law and political philosophy.) He wrote clearly about his view on the death penalty in his Crime and Delinquency article, “Defending the Death Penalty.” He argued that the “Opposition to capital punishment is a modern phenomenon, a product of modern sentiment and modern thought” (p. 504) and with the help of historical references and logical reasoning throughout
All Our Names By Dinaw Mengesu: An Analysis
284 Words | 2 PagesIn the novel, All Our Names, Dinaw Mengestu explains the prejudice and stereotypes that African people were subjected to when they arrived to America in the 1960 's. Before Helen even met Isaac she assumed that he would be short, malnourished, and that his English would be poor. Upon meeting him, she realized that her assumptions about him were completely wrong. Towards the middle of the novel Helen stated," It 's also equally possible …. that, regardless of what we do, we are tied to all the prejudices in our country and the crimes that come with them" (Mengestu 113). She 's making the point that maybe despite all our efforts we still carry prejudiced opinions with us because they have been so deeply ingrained into our minds.
Coretta Scott King The Death Penalty Is A Step Back Analysis
754 Words | 4 PagesIn the essay “The Death Penalty Is a Step Back” the author, Coretta Scott King expresses her feelings about capital punishment and states reasons to back up her argument that the death penalty is both a racist and immoral practice. King believes that capital punishment is immoral and illegal, and that it by no means serves as a deterrent for other possible criminals. The author then further talks about how there have been numerous incidents where the mistakenly convicted is put down in the name of American justice. King then argues that by sentencing someone to death, one is assuming that the person convicted is not capable of rehabilitation. The
Summary Of Igor Primoratz's The Ethical Life
1318 Words | 6 PagesI am not one to argue that capital punishment is without its flaws, nor am I one to argue that the death penalty is not inherently ugly in its entirety. I simply make the argument that the death penalty, or capital punishment, is a necessary evil. To accomplish this, I will begin by dissecting the arguments made by Stephen Nathanson in An Eye for an Eye. Nathanson states that for some crimes, it would not be considered morally acceptable to provide equal punishment to crimes committed. For example, I listed earlier that if we applied the equal punishment principle flatly across our justice system, it would require us to not only kill murderers, but also rape rapists, torture torturers, and kidnap kidnappers.
Annotated Bibliography: The New Jim Crow
1343 Words | 6 PagesHer central thesis is that mass incarceration is “The New Jim Crow,” or the new system of control used by the government to uphold racial class in the U.S. This book will be helpful to my research because it directly discusses the topic of race and the criminal justice system. Amnesty International. (2003). United States of America: Death by discrimination
Annotated Bibliography On Death Penalty
1145 Words | 5 PagesAnother issue that was discussed is the inequality of death penalty in practice. There have been serious issues with racial discrimination. For reference in cases with white victims and black defendants convictions occurred twenty two percent of the time while with black victims and white defendants with percentage dropped to a measly three
Rhetorical Analysis Of Jk Rowley Speech
877 Words | 4 PagesShe uses ethos here because the speech is from a graduation and she’s an expert in graduating because she experienced it herself and she has an excellent life now. “Now all I have to do is take deep breaths, squint at the red banners and convince myself that I am at the world’s largest Gryffindor reunion” (Page 1, column 1, line 10-13) This is an allusion because it’s a reference to her well-known Harry Potter book series. This reference is very good, because many people know of her work and therefore they will relate to the content. “I have decided to talk to you about the benefits of failure.
More about Analysis Of In Our Names By Lesly K Gunter
Edward Koch Ethos
322 Words | 2 PagesMccleskey V. Kemp Case Study
964 Words | 4 PagesSummary Of The Sentencing Reform Act Of 1984
461 Words | 2 PagesChristopher Lee Simmons Essay
1302 Words | 6 PagesSummary Of Starving For Wisdom By Nicholas Kristof
1091 Words | 5 PagesDeath Penalty In Helen Prejean's Dead Man Walking
2267 Words | 10 PagesDoes The Death Penalty Violate The 8th Amendment
405 Words | 2 PagesDeath Penalty: Francis V. Resweber
1653 Words | 7 PagesWalter Berns Arguments Against The Death Penalty
1788 Words | 8 PagesAll Our Names By Dinaw Mengesu: An Analysis
284 Words | 2 PagesCoretta Scott King The Death Penalty Is A Step Back Analysis
754 Words | 4 PagesSummary Of Igor Primoratz's The Ethical Life
1318 Words | 6 PagesAnnotated Bibliography: The New Jim Crow
1343 Words | 6 PagesAnnotated Bibliography On Death Penalty
1145 Words | 5 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Jk Rowley Speech
877 Words | 4 Pages