Analysis Of Into The Wild, By Christopher Mccandless

In the biography about Chris McCandless, Into The Wild, author Jon Krakauer shows how independent McCandless is in the first three chapters. Krakauer shows how independent McCandless is, or how independent he thinks he is, through his diction and indirect characterization. Krakauer continuously added parts into the book that showed how independent Chris was. When writing a letter to Carin, one of the people he had been living with at the time, he complained, “they will think that they have bought my respect!” (21).

In the biography Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer holds Chris McCandless in high esteem and shows this admiration by including narrative that shows what makes Chris Special. In the story, whenever Krakauer records people's experiences with Chris he always makes sure Chris is seen in a good light. When Chris was hitchhiking and picked up by a man named Jim Gallien, Jim thought that Chris was an idiot for not packing enough equipment and trying to go live in the woods. However, during the ride Chris peppers Jim with sensible questions making Jim realizes that Chris is not as much, “as a nutcase” as he thought. (Krakauer 5) Krakauer included how Chris was thinking on how to survive.

Throughout the Non-Fiction book “Into the Wild” the author Jon Krakauer traces young McCandless footsteps as he changed from Chris McCandless to Alex. More specially, Krakauer unfolds mysteries as to why McCandless abounded his previous life including his past identity. Young McCandless cuts off all connections with his family and goes into a journey to Alaska, where he encounters various obstacles. Krakauer anecdotes asserts McCandless as an individual lost trying to re-create himself.

Do you believe “Alex” Christopher Johnson McCandless was successful? Many people say Alex was not successful in any way. Why burn 25,000 dollars and hitchhike to Alaska. “Some readers admires the boy immensely for his courage and noble ideals; others fulminated that he was a reckless idiot, a wacko, a narcissist who perished out of arrogance and stupidity”(Krakauer, Authors note). I Believe Alex was very successful at times, but there were times he was not at all.

The national bestseller Into The Wild written by Jon Krakauer follows one of the best known transcendentalists of the late 20th century, Christopher McCandless, through his journey across the country and into the Alaskan wilderness. The trip helps Chris find pure happiness, and being tested by the elements lets him experience what he believed to be the true beauty of life. In spite of the fact that Chris always seemed to have been drawn to nature, Krakauer hints to other reasons as to why Chris originally left. There are a few reasons for Chris’ departure from civilization, but the push that propelled him away from the only home he ever knew was his parents, Walt and Billie. Despite his overwhelming awe for nature, the most plausible reason

The spiritual traveler is truly a unique breed, someone willing to sacrifice all they have to achieve what they believe to be a greater calling in life. Reaching a greater purpose or calling is no simple task though, for the hardships the spiritual traveler encounters have to ultimately will them to continue to follow the dreams. Chris McCandless, a young man found dead in the Alaskan wilderness, was damned as a lunatic by skeptics alike. The vast majority of the media were unable to wrap their heads around why McCandless would mosey off into the brutal wild unprepared, inexperienced and alone. Determined to not let the negative media have the last say about McCandless' legacy though, Jon Krakauer as a follow up to his article on the young

Once again, we are tasked with writing another QVSR paper. “Find an epigraph that explains Krakauer’s purpose in writing this book”. In the guidelines, however, we received a very interesting thought to dwell on, “What is Krakauer’s purpose in this book?” Initially I was prepared to write this paper, and not even think for a second about why he might have wanted to script this nonfiction book. As you can already tell from my title, I think there is a simply explanation for that.

The inspiration another influence can have on someone’s life is immeasurable and intense; changing whole life paths. This phenomenon is exemplified by Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer. In this novel, the main character, Chris McCandless assumes a new identity, hitchhikes to Alaska, and eventually succumbs as starvation claims his life in the Alaskan bush. This morbid ending does not stop many young people from connecting to his charismatic ideas and following in Chris’s footsteps. The legacy that Chris left on the minds of America is a more lasting one than he could have ever imagined.

Krakauer’s Into the Wild gives readers a spontaneous urge to toss our cell phones into a shredder and pursue a life deprived of apples, not the edible ones. We often forget that such a “Flintstone-like” life even exists because our dependence of technology consumes us. Chris McCandless, the main character, serves not only to make us aware of this nomadic alternative but also presents that happiness exists without owning the latest cell phone or a vehicle with a dumb peace sign or crown. Evidently, the power of technology is far greater than we imagine; our dependency on technology has made us materialistic individuals that base our happiness on luxury items. Technology can be an ideology meant to advance or improve our lifestyles.

Throughout all of McCandless’s adventures he often meets new people who take a liking to him, despite McCandless having trouble with the concept of intimacy, as he would rather be secluded from everything. Everytime he is confronted with a new acquaintance, he is always offered goods to help him on his journey. However, McCandless is against the fact that you need to have money to be successful in this materialistic world, and he is trying to challenge that idea by going on adventures without any money, as it would be to easy. In this passage he is resenting the fact that he himself cannot make it in this world without money, but he still chooses to live in that lifestyle because it is a much more free life, away from everyone.

Realist: This means to have an understanding of what can be accomplished. By using this word, Krakauer was able to let the readers know that he viewed McCandless as more of a realist than an idealist. Being a realist is a noble trait, due to its denotation meaning of the word which implies that one knows their own limit and weakness and knows how to set forth and complete a goal. Ambivalent about killing animals: The meaning of the phrase is having mixed or contradictory feelings or ideas about killing animals.

Into the wild “Some people feel like they don’t deserve love. They walk away quietly into empty spaces, trying to close the gaps of the past” (John Krakauer). Do you think feeling some type of way should give you the right just to leave everyone? I believe that McCandless is dumb for leaving his family and friends without a warning. Having them worried sick for him without knowing anything of where he is.

Born in A Different Life Life on the road is an idealistic way to escape from societal problems. There is no denying that it grants individuals satisfaction by allowing them to fulfill their goals, as well as providing immense freedom and control over one’s life; however, it is a fundamentally illogical path to take due to nature’s malevolence. In Into The Wild, Krakauer writes a biography about a young man named Chris McCandless, in which he illustrates the similarities between himself and McCandless’s overly ambitious journey to accomplish feats in the wilderness. Coinciding with their similarities, they also faced an oppressive father figure at home, which lead the both of them to believe that their journey will provide them an answer to their problems at home. McCandless planned to survive in Alaska by living off the land while Krakauer wanted to be the first one to climb the Devil’s Thumb.

“If you are always trying to be normal, you will never know how amazing you can be.” ―Maya Angelou. Jon Krakauer’s true story titled Into the Wild is about a man who decides to throw away his old life and escape the rules of conventional society. Twenty-two-year-old Chris McCandless came from a well-to-do family in Virginia and, without warning, abandons everything. He changes his name, loses contact with his family, gives away his car and all his money, and begins a two-year long journey hitchhiking to Alaska where he eventually dies of starvation.

Chris McCandless from the book “Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer is a character who is extremely well liked by all. His smarts give him the ability to hold conversations with a variety of different people. Chris does not use his knowledge in a negative way that causes people to think that he is arrogant, it just comes out of him naturally, leaving many people impressed by the young boy. Through his character, I learned how much intelligence can truly add to one's personality. Chris is subconsciously phenomenal at speaking with new people due to his wide range of knowledge.