Even as costs for law enforcement, jails and prisons spiraled upward. In addition, fundamentalist and nativist forces had gained more control over the temperance movement, alienating its more moderate members. The increase of the illegal production and sale of liquor, the proliferation of speakeasies and the accompanying rise in gang violence and other crimes, led to waning support for Prohibition by the end of the 1920s. With the country mired in the Great Depression by 1932, creating jobs and revenue by legalizing the liquor industry had an undeniable appeal. Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt ran for president that year on a platform calling for Prohibition’s appeal, and easily won victory.
In Doc. H the cartoon shows the downfall effect of alcohol had on the life of the laborers. The temperance movement worked to expand democratic ideals by protecting the common man from himself. This movement improved the work ethic and wellness of the people. This was accomplished by turning down the evils of alcohol consumption.
People began to improve sanitation and personal hygiene. The betterment of having a clean society, and making cities less crowded. (Stock) The cleaner society and less populous cities made for less outbreaks of disease, more living space, and less congestion when traveling. There were safety regulations put out by state and national governments in the U.S. so that the disease would not spread. (Ott) The regulations put out by government ensured that the outbreak would come to an immediate halt, and if a new epidemic were to sweep through the states, it would be derailed.
Most Americans, especially politicians, agree that the repealing of the Prohibition of alcohol in the 1920s was one of the best pieces of legislature the country passed. This situation parallels what is brimming in America today, about seventy years later, with marijuana. The recreational use of cannabis has skyrocketed and is now a pastime comparable to drinking a glass of wine to relax or unwind. However, there is one glaring difference between the two acts: one is punishable by law. The prohibition of marijuana does not stop Americans from obtaining the drug, but simply intensifies the unnecessary criminality and danger surrounding its use.
Recent studies found that the most effective way of reducing gun crime is to lower the amount of guns available in circulation. In the US specifically, studies show that the stricter gun laws are in a state, the lower the amount of deaths related to guns occur (Graham). While many believe that further restrictions on guns would not be feasible, both Australia and the United Kingdom managed to highly restrict or ban guns from their nations in order to reduce gun-related deaths and crime (Graham). Australia was able to rid the country of around 650,000 guns and their rate of robberies per 100,000 people sank from about 100 to 60 (cite later 1). This program of complete gun confiscation costed Australia $230 million.
The question is: was prohibition successful? David E. Kyvig claims that prohibition was a failure because it only reduced alcohol consumption among certain groups of people, whereas J. C. Burnham claims that it was a success because it reduced alcohol-related arrests, injuries, and consumption
The main argument of Laura Dean-Mooney is that the 21 law saves lives because the number of people killed in crashes since the law was enacted has been cut in half. The number of crashes “ has been cut in half, from more than 5,000 individuals in the early 1980s to around 2,000 in 2005”(Dean Mooney 5). Another argument made was that the effects of alcohol are magnified when a teenager’s brain is still developing, “alcohol negatively affects all parts of the brain, include cognitive and decision-making abilities as well as coordination and memory”(Dean-Mooney 9). Dean-Mooney implies that since the legal drinking age has been 21, this law is the most studied in history. She highlights that scientific studies found the 21-year-old law saves lives on and off the road.
With careful input, after more than 10 long years of trying to enforce the unrealistic law, the government acknowledge that prohibition was a grand loss. The 21st amendment, approved in 1933, finished the failed experiment and reestablished Americans’ legal right to drink whatever they would please. Prohibition should have educated the government about attempting to readjust personal
Social apathy The progressive technology not only boosts the economy and products forward, but also cause society to communicate less and feeling indifferent to each other. In modern times, it has become a phenomenon, which is called “social apathy”. As these case happened anytime anywhere, so some people say that social apathy is a problem in today’s world. To a great extent, I agree with statement for three reasons which are affecting the human right, lost you say in society and environmental issue being deteriorate. On the following paragraphs, I will demonstrate my thesis and opinions.
When focusing on the America, as discussed before, the suicide rate related to guns indeed increased faster than the suicide related to other methods. What the essay focuses on is the gun control in the United States, the longitudinal comparison of data is more reliable. In spite of the suicide rate of the United States is not the highest, the stricter gun control also could work and reduce the suicide rate. There have been some more reliable data could show that the gun ownership is likely to increase suicide rate. When taking the whole thing into consideration, it is clear that making the controls over guns stricter still could be beneficial in many