One similarity is that both sides are trying to achieve the goal of making an imprint on others around them. Although, a difference is that the author’s side is a more realistic scenario and non-fictional while Equality’s side is more within the realm of Anthem and completely fictional. Additionally, another similarity is the fact that both sides can be applied to modern day society in the sense that everyone wants to make the world a better place and no matter where we come from, or what we do, we can change the world. We can make an imprint on society that inspires generations to come. Lastly, there is one more major difference between the two sides of Equality’s motivation.
Equality is something people want till people actually have it. Equality often limits a person’s abilities and disables to do something for themselves or inspire themselves. Equality's, the main character in the book Anthem, the primary motivation is proving that he is smart enough to become a scholar. Equality has a right to be motivated in this way since he believes that he can help the society so he is giving into the collectivism. I think that if everyone was motivated in this way, there would be a more progressive society where people sought to improve themselves and society at the same time.
John Locke wrote that the purpose of electing legislative powers was to create laws and rules that protected the “properties of all the members of society,” a natural right of mankind (5). Enlightened thought presented by Locke outlined the formation for a new government that served the people of the nation, restoring their rights and liberties, rather than just the
They are the ones you hope will one day become a reality. They are the dreams of a better education, better wages, better living conditions, equality, and they are the dreams of a better life. So then what exactly does the “American Dream” mean to people, how are these dreams achieved by those who are not native to our country, why do some people make it while others fail and who does the “The American Dream” really belong to? When you look up the definition of The American Dream on Google, this is what you get, A·mer·i·can dream əˈmerəkən drēm/ Noun the ideal that every US citizen should have an equal opportunity to achieve success and prosperity through hard work, determination, and initiative. but the definition of The American Dream really isn’t just as simple as “the ideal that every US citizen should have an equal opportunity to achieve success and prosperity through hard work, determination, and initiative”.
Everyone has to be equal in order to achieve liberty because people have to be equal in order to have the same freedoms. It is important for everyone to have unalienable rights because with these rights, people have the opportunity to be happy and the opportunity to live. The third ideal is the right to alter or abolish government. It is important
For the progressives, the reason why they might get involved in society is to create or enforce social and economic equality and to push for social modernity. For progressives, they view in part the human nature of Locke, Rousseau and Marx. Marx is mentioned, since progressives want a bigger government to enforce social and economic equality for all. For Locke and Rousseau they both have an optimistic view of human nature, Rousseau believes humans can have unlimited improvement and for Locke government can help humans by enforcing laws to protect them and their property. Progressives believe like Locke that the sole purpose of government is to protect the rights of its citizens.
Identity is understood to show individualism, yet the caste system limits anyone’s capability to be an individual. With community and identity, stability is supposed to be achieved, but the novel makes you question if stability is an actual thing that can happen in society. In Brave New World, many things are done to ensure stability, three of them being the tyranny of happiness, drugging the population, and the mass production of children. With these three factors, it is eerie how close Aldous Huxley came to predicting the impact of these in the future of society. First of all, the world state is obsessed with making people “happy”.
After analyzing both philosophers, it should be that a government should be established based on human's nature to sin, but Locke’s ideas are perceived to be more developed in a realistic government applied today. If no form of government was established it can be argued what the overall outcome
When the ideologies of conformity and individualism merge it combines into a greater society as a whole, better than either of the individual half’s. To create an utopian society, a society has to accept the individuality of a person, but it also has to have certain guidelines that are followed. Merry
Touching base on Peace cosmology refers “share morality” in sphere of socio political aspect where the Liberal peace theory seems a piece of cake that inclined more democratic state prescribed by the prominent philosopher “Immanuel Kant (perpetual peace, 153:554)where advised the three principals as freedom for all members of a society ,dependency of everyone upon a single legislation and legal equality and in his literature he also draw attention in metaphysics and moral in civil constitutions through law fullness .Codifying another judgment on democracy through a question are democracy belligerent or peaceful? By “Johan Galtung” and given his analysis in his book (peace by peaceful means 50:56 ) where the research output given the nine theorem to building a theory relating democracy and belligerent that refers on positive activity of individualistic and competitive culture the more likely the country enjoy the democracy where the more human rights are implemented and shared decision making concept positively prescribed and proved. 1.See the Book of Johan Galtung ,Peace by peace full means “part four- chapter,” Exploration”(Pathological cosmology) Where he defines-the Cosmology is