French feminist and Poststructuralist, Julia Kristeva hits upon her theory of Intertextuality in the late 1960s, while she was engaged in her somewhat combined study of Saussure and Bakhtin's theories of language and literature. She represents a transitional phase described "in terms of a move from structuralism to poststructuralism". Allen outlines the pervasive presence of 'intertextuality' in contemporary major theoretical contexts. Accordingly, Intertextuality originates in Kristevan blending of Saussure and Bakhtin. Its subsequent poststructuralist articulation is evidenced in Roland Barthes and its variant, structuralist formulation in Genettee and Riffaterre. Thereafter, the feminist and postcolonial theorists adopt and adapt the term, …show more content…
According to Macey, Kristeva hits upon and elaborates her outstanding concept of intertextuality during her studies of Mikhail Bakhtin. In a major sequel of her essays she begins to formulate her theory of 'semanalysis', combining 'semiotics' and 'psychoanalysis', in which she studies the subject and her/his relations to the archaic drives and the pre-linguistic elements that circulate in the chora and the semiotic (Ibid.).
Kristeva's one of the major works is Problems de la structuration du texte (tr. Word, Dialogue and Novel) in which she propounds her theory of intertextuality. Kristevan concept of "intertextuality" is built upon Bakhtin's notion of "polyphonic" utterances, that is to say, a free play of at times contesting voices in a single text such as a novel" (Lane 189). In her notion of "textuality" the ideologeme forms its micrological unit. In other words, in a system the smallest ideological component is the ideologme. Lane further explains that to
…show more content…
Her concept of intertextuality presents its antithesis in which she argues "in favour of the open systems of poststructuralism". She, therefore, formulates "a wider theory of text as 'productivity' where there is always a subject-in-process spoken and situated by the relations between sign systems" (Lane 190). Intertextuality, thus, constitutes one significant component of her theory of textual productivity.
Kristeva in the 1960s coined the term intertextuality, which may be taken as an attempt on her part to synthesize her readings of Saussure's structural semiotics and Bakhtin's 'dialogism' (double-voicing in novel) and 'hetroglossia' (other- languageness), which may produce "multivalence" or "plurisignation" in a work of art. In his book's 'introduction' section Peter Barry sums up Bakhtin's contribution in the field of literary theory in the following
(1st Slide) Distinctively Visual Distinctively Visual ideas in text have the power to provoke reactions from the responders. The elements of characterisation, dialogue, stage directions and dramatic techniques, cause responders to question the notions of normalcy, and challenge them to think and visualise in new ways. (2nd Slide)
Throughout the novel of The Death of Ivan Ilych, Tolstoy conveys his thematic focus through his unique use of diction. Tolstoy examines several factors that have altered Ivan Ilych’s lifestyle. The only way to enhance our understanding of these factors is to observe how Tolstoy portrays Ivan’s evolving comprehension of what death means to him. Evidently, such portrayal can be thoroughly observed and understood by carefully analyzing Tolstoy’s use of diction. Furthermore, there are several themes that Tolstoy focuses on primarily, which are often associated with the depiction of the human existence as a conflict between different sides of the spectrum and Ivan’s tendency to alienate himself from the world.
(Radical Feminism 117) through her diction. By using phrases such as
This common interest of postmodern feminists about women’s bodies and how it serves as a “feminine language” to define identity continues to represent explorations, discovery and opinions of the traditional mind and body dualism, the role of sexual analysis in the development of gender and the self as well as the analytical modes of exploration of the body which all in all defines what it means to discuss about postmodern feminist issues in this twenty-first century. For example, in Mislina Mustaffa’s opinion, the female body directly reflects an artistic subjection to what is considered a norm to women in society today. Nevertheless, the artist disagrees with such manner. The entire discovery of what makes a woman a woman in fact lies in the matter other than the body itself. One route of inquiry along these lines concerns reevaluation of the senses and the conservative materials that are fashioned into forms or ideas that define the identities of women today.
The term "creative imagination" is like thinking about things and using your imagination which has no rules and no boundaries. In using our creative imaginations, we work within the parameters set out in the text, to freely inquire about the possible meanings and related to the images, characters, and events. Our affective response to a writing makes this process, we respond or relate to certain things of the writing and it is in trying to understand the meaning that such features hold for us, and also attempting to discover the possible meanings the writer had in mind while writing the piece, that we allow literature to connect us with creative imagination. He uses intertextuality which refers to connections that often very often appear in literature.
Thus, Dostoevsky’s descriptions of setting and character reveal a use of space
Rather, its is our own familiar routine manner of perceiving things that we assume a connection between the text and the image. Magritte has argued that in relation to a different set of images, neither the painted image nor the words are, in actuality, a pipe. He presents this contradiction in its simplest form, ‘a calligram that Magritte has secretly constructed, then carefully unraveled’ (ibid, pg20) highlighting the difference between the ‘separation of linguistic signs and plastic elements’. Magritte combines verbal signs and plastic elements together but without ‘referring them to prior isotopism’. This is Magritte’s attempt to expose us of our own immediate automaticity that is so deeply
Implicated within the conflict of Light versus Darkness, operating at the level of both text and music, there is a linguistic coordination that configure woman in an
While this policy was brought in 1909, the practice had already been going on for a century and remained apart of government policy until 1969. This piece will attempt to discuss why post colonialism is the most relevant theory than feminist theory. Though a comparison of the foundational structures, operational appearances as well as
In his essay Bakhtin provides an analysis of the relationship between individual utterances and the ideologically charged forces that affect them, he writes: “The dialogic interaction of a word among other words (of all kinds and degrees of otherness) creates new and significant artistic potential in discourse, creates the potential for a distinctive art of prose, which has found its fullest and deepest expression in the novel.” (275) i.e. there are dialogic relations between the narrator and the writer, the author and the character, the story and other stories, culture and text and society and text. A novel is in fact characterized by heteroglossiawhere many voices (writer, character, society) are mixed which gives originality to the text.
Julia Kristeva is a psychoanalyst and feminist writer who talks about what she calls the “semiotic” and the “symbolic”; for her, all signification is made up of these two elements. On the one hand, the semiotic element can be associated with Lacan’s pre-mirror stage, understanding the “mirror-stage” as the moment when the child starts to “see himself, to find himself” in the mirror. So according to Kristeva, the semiotic element comes before this moment, it is associated with the maternal body which is, according to professor Kelly Oliver “the first source of rhythms, tones and movements for every human
Therefore, the inclusion of ‘oppressed’ groups, such as women of colour, with different sexualities beyond heterosexuality, of different economic backgrounds and further aspects took place, to a large extent, throughout the second wave of feminism (Krolokke & Sorensen, 2005, p. 1). Women all over the globe fought for their rights in as well as outside the labour market (ibid., p. 8). Several outcomes emerged through the waves of feminism and feminist movements. Not only could they, as social agents, lead to a new form of
Archetypes and Archetypal Criticism Northrop Frye from ‘The Archetypes of Literature’ Archetypal Criticism can be based on the idea, as critic Northrop Frye states, that literature can be seen as a ‘complication of a relatively restricted and simple group of formulas’ that originate from a primitive form of art. Basically, what archetypal criticism proposes is that any work of literature ever made has can be broken down to specific patterns and formulas that are valid in every literary context. Etymologically, the word ‘archetype’ comes from the Greek “arkhe” which means “first” and “typos” which can be translated as “model”. In the “Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology”, the term “archetype” is defined as ‘original pattern from which copies are made’ . Applied to literature we can understand that all literary works are a different and reorganized variant of a pre-existing form that dates back to primitive times.
One such systems is a centre-periphery concept of French scholar Pascale Casanova. According to her The World Republic of Letters, writers across the globe exist in a single literary space, which is (here she very much follows Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of literary field) politically and, subsequently, aesthetic autonomous. This space serves as a field for writers’ competition — both personal and national — and recognition. This field, The Republic of Letters, has
It argues that literary texts, like dreams, express the secret unconscious desires and anxieties of the author, that a literary work is a expression of the author 's own instability. One may psychoanalyze