ipl-logo

Analysis Of Let Them Eat Dong By Jonathan Safran Foer

852 Words4 Pages

In the Story “Let them eat dong: A Modest proposal for tossing Fido in the oven” Jonathan Safran Foer brings to light the idea of how some animals are seen as special and not eaten. Using dogs as the example in showing how a person wouldn’t dare to eat one, but are okay with eat a pig or any other living creature. Making the argument that all living animals have feeling and are special in their own ways, so none of them should be eaten but rather cherished like a dog is. Although the story is unbelievably well written and with great point on culture about food, equality of animals and the…, yet there is only emotional appeal and bias towards his idea of not eating meat. Though out the story Foer makes the point that if we eat some animals why not all. Why do people find some animals life’s to be more important than other? When he states …show more content…

At first glance and a quick scan the story seems to be a joke that really isn’t serious. Yet to fully understand what he meant the audience would have to reread it and pay close attention to what the author means. One the first page of the story there are three lines that catch people’s attention “The French, who love their dogs, sometimes eat horse…The Spanish, who lover their horses, sometimes eat their cows… Indians, who love their cows, sometimes eat their dogs “(217), they are funny but it’s a light way of hinting towards a bigger topic. It makes a lot of his argument about how different animals are seen and eating around the world pretty much a joke. The way the story is great but having a more normal straight to the point and with the fact the story might have given more information to the audience in how to better understand the issue. Since its written in a form where the reader has to understand that Foer is not series about consuming dog but rather making a point, many people could miss it and get

Show More
Related

  • An Analysis Of Against Meat By Jonathan Safran Foer

    1009 Words  | 5 Pages

    Summary In this article “Against Meat” Jonathan Safran Foer describes his personal experience with struggling whether he eats meat or not and what he went through to become a vegetarian, his main reason was he didn’t want animals to suffer. Foer had a lot of influence in his life, starting with his grandmother who he considered her as a role model he loved her passion with food, although she had one recipe

    Read More

  • Farm City Summary

    1122 Words  | 5 Pages

    We owe the animal respect.” Novella adored all her animals that she raises and even cuddles with them although knowing she will end up sadly killing it. She knew that this was part of life and it’s a process that she had to do in order to have ‘true connections’ with her food. When we grow respect and understanding for our foods we also learn to appreciate the value of what good produce go through to get to our plates. The power to modify our ideal food is at our

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Gary Steiner's Animal, Vegetable Mineral

    755 Words  | 4 Pages

    This short story explains and questions how people find eating animals morally acceptable. Steiner 's short story explains that whenever people think these animals are being treated respectfully they are being ignorant to the fact of how these animals are truly treated; Steiner brings up the fact of how an animals typical horrid life is and how it transitions from its horrid life to being killed by a butcher in a matter of seconds. Moreover, Steiner also adheres to the topic of how unacceptable, it is to kill these animals just for human consumption. Steiner 's purpose in writing this short story is to display to us the fact that eating any animal is not only wrong, but it is just downright unacceptable as it is mass murder of these innocent animals. Finally, Steiner tries to define at his best, what a strict vegan truly

    Read More

  • Foer Eating Animals Analysis

    732 Words  | 3 Pages

    Jonathan Safran Foer’s Eating Animals is a book about persuasion. Foer seeks to convince his readers to take any step in reducing what he believes is the injustice of harming animals. To achieve this, Foer employs many persuasion techniques and often changes his approach when he targets specific groups. His strategies include establishing himself as an ethical authority and appealing to his readers’ emotions, morals, and reason.

    Read More

  • Jonathan Foer Let Them Eat Dog Rhetorical Analysis

    1521 Words  | 7 Pages

    In fact, within this claim he mentions dogs in a way that forces the reader to reflect on the claims he made about dogs earlier within the piece. Foer argues for the consumption of dog in a logical way in order to draw attention to a bigger issue: the treatment of animals in factory-farmed meat. While Foer might still be pro-eating dog, his entire argument that he presents throughout the essay is, essentially, a different perspective on the issue of factory-farmed meat. He relates this issue to the audience by bringing up a controversial topic, and while he may not convince his audience to eat dog, he at the very least shows that, logically, eating dog could make sense. Once he has made his point clear, he points to hypothetical situations of how dogs would be humanely prepared if they were to be eaten by stating, “we can all agree that if we’re going to eat them, we should kill them quickly and painlessly” (605).

    Read More

  • Summary Of You Can T Run Away On Harvest Day By Peter Singer

    216 Words  | 1 Pages

    In my synthesis essay, the three selected readings, “Equality for Animals” by Peter Singer, “You Can’t Run away on Harvest Day” by Barbara Kingsolver, and “Animal, Vegetable, Miserable” by Gary Steiner, will answer the following question; What does it mean to eat ethically? What moral principles should guide our food choices and ways of eating? Between these three essays, they all made emphasis on how ethical eating is defined as sourcing food and eating it in ways that will not cause damage or injuries, neither physically nor mentally, to the food or the eater. Recently, people have expressed interest in where the meat and dairy they are consuming comes from and how it was raised.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Escape From The Western Diet

    1739 Words  | 7 Pages

    As diets and health become more and more of a public concern in America. Two authors weigh in on their opinions on how the American public should handle the problem of obesity as well as their solutions to the overwhelming issue. In one article, “Against Meat,” published on the New York Times website in 2009, points out that the solution to obesity should be vegetarianism. Johnathan Foer who is a vegetarian, claims that his diet and way of living is his the way of improving health in the American public. Foer’s article provides a sense of humor as well as personal stories to attempt to persuade his audience for the ethical treatment of animals along with his personal solution for his own health and the health of his family.

    Read More

  • Consider The Lobster Analysis

    1527 Words  | 7 Pages

    On page 60, footnote 8 compares the pegging/banding of lobsters’ claws to the debeaking of broiler chickens, the cropping of swines’ tails, and the dehorning of cattle. Recognizing that the reader will likely fail to see the impact of the banding, Foster Wallace provides the comparison of other similar practices that will likely be more promptly deemed unacceptable. Under footnote 14, Foster Wallace extends the comparison, driving the reader to understand the distinction made between the consumption of mammals and non-mammals that is notable in speech. When describing mammals as food, we use separate words to distinguish them as creatures and dishes, such as “cow” and “beef,” and “pig” and “pork.” However, non-mammals share the same names in the wild and on menus, such as “shrimp,” “salmon,” and “lobster.”

    Read More

  • The Omnivore's Dilemma Analysis

    1180 Words  | 5 Pages

    For example in the Dominican Republic they eat a meal called “Mondongo” and this dish is basically pig or cow intestine including the stomach, feet, and many other inner parts. To the people of the Dominican Republic this meal is part of their tradition and it’s a type of delicacy. On the other hand in many other places it’s seen as dirty or something that shouldn’t be eaten. Being a poor country all parts of the animals are not to be wasted thus making it a norm. Another example of the Omnivore’s dilemma is deciding what to eat and what not to eat based on the condition of how what they are going to consume was grown or raised.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Dog Food

    774 Words  | 4 Pages

    It is evident throughout the article that both Halkon and the main subjects which she argues for, Humane Society International (HSI) and Ricky Gervais, have taken an ethnocentric stance in voicing out their opposition against Yulin dog meat eating practices. By imposing their idiosyncratic opinion and understanding of justifiability of actions on that of Yulin culture, their ability to acknowledge and develop a sociological understanding of cultural practices apart from their own is thus impaired. Highly biased and even hyperbolic accounts are therefore being laid out by Halkon and her sources throughout the article. While the Yulin Dog Meat Festival may seem savagely cruel and may have enraged many, the Yulin locals view their culture of consuming dog meat in a very different perspective. To them, dog meat carries an abundance of health benefits and is of high nutritional value.

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of David Wallace's 'Consider The Lobster'

    1736 Words  | 7 Pages

    The consumption of animal meat is highly accepted in today’s society, however, the methods, in which the animals are killed are sometimes questioned for their cruelty. David Wallace, in considering the Lobster, takes the readers to the Maine Lobster Festival, where the consumption of lobsters is exploited, and the festival's attendees celebrate these acts. However, the essay goes furthermore than narrating the lobster’s festival, because through sensory details, and different techniques, he makes the readers question society’s morality. By stressing the cruelty it takes boiling lobsters alive, Wallace is capable of creating a sense of awareness in society decisions that demonstrate their corrupted morality, and how it affects directly others (like lobsters)

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Peter Singer's 'Down On The Factory Farm'

    422 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis “Down on the factory farm” The last thing that comes to our mind when we order a piece of steak at a restaurant is how that animal we are about to eat was being treated while they were alive. According to author Peter Singer’s article "Down on the factory farm” he questions what happened to your dinner when it was still an animal? He argues about the use and abuse of animals raised for our consumption. In Singer’s article he states personal facts and convincing statistics to raise a legitimate argument.

    Read More

  • Lack Of Knowledge In George Orwell's Animal Farm

    1900 Words  | 8 Pages

    Mr. Jones is Tsar Nicholas II, the last Russian emperor. He was a bad ruler of Russia. The people experience poverty and upheaval. The animals on animal farm lived miserable lives. In the story, Old major says, “Now, comrades, what is the nature of this life is ours?

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Eating Meat

    1421 Words  | 6 Pages

    The meat packing industry disregards animal’s emotions and their rights all together by the malicious treatment of animals. The way animals are being treated is highly unfair. Being slaughtered for their body parts and suffering just to be used for protein or an asset to humans is unbearable. An animal’s life is at equal values to a human and deserve the same rights as

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Eating Animals Essay

    748 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the United States, people have all been wondering is it ethical to eat meat. Eating meat can be very harmful, because it can cause a lot of diseases like Heart disease and other ones. You should not have to kill animals for food because animals are kind of like people. Some more reasons that you should not eat animals, is because eating too much meat can be harmful to the human body, We could just eat plants and other things, and killing animals can be bad so that is why we should not eat animals.

    Read More

More about Analysis Of Let Them Eat Dong By Jonathan Safran Foer

Open Document