It seems that debt has become a norm in today’s society; people do not flinch at the sound of the word or attempt everything in their power to not succumb to it. When debt was a feared concept, people ran away from it. However today it seems that people are somewhat forced into a life of debt. The piece by Margeret Atwood, “Debtor’s Prism” is one about how the idea of debt has been deeply woven into our literature, social structure, and culture. Since the recession began in late 2007, Atwood takes a unique perspective of the history behind debt and the meaning of having been pawned. The piece, “Investigating the Nation’s Exploding Credit Squeeze” by Danny Schechter talks about the debt in a different way than Atwood did. Schechter’s piece …show more content…
Essentially, by going home for a year or two after college gives young adults the opportunity to take control of their career, finances, and allows them to transition from the college bubble to the real world. A few decades ago, that would seem like a crazy concept. However, in today’s society that makes a lot of sense because of the financial instability and the force of debt into people’s lives. The last piece, “The ‘Responsible’ Child?” by Florinda Vasquez, follows the same theme however, it opposes Healy’s view. Vasquez talks about how it has become a lot harder for young adults to make it in the real world today; she has seen it first hand with her own son, Chris. She is glad that, in Healy’s words, her son is irresponsible because he did not return home after college. Even though all these pieces approach the topic of debt in impressively different ways, they all have a similar string between them. These four pieces along with society today makes one believe that people are somewhat bottle necked into debt. The financial stability everyone wants is somewhat impossible for the common …show more content…
Danny Schechter wrote Investigating the Nation’s Exploding Credit Squeeze, two years before the 2008 world crisis. It is said that only true crisis can lead to change, an explanation to why so many people ignored the signs. Everyone is a target to the credit industry, not only the poor or middle classes. In a consumption driven culture, it is impossible not to spend your money and get into debt. Products seem fairly cheap, companies are always suggesting that you are making “a great bargain”, “buy two and one free” and it seems that everything is always “on sale” (Schechter 357). In the documentary In Debt We Trust by, Schechter talks about how the mall has replaced the factory as America’s dominant economic engine. The film shows how big banks and credit cards companies drive Americans to become sheep. Schechter is clear when he says that a bubble could burst, and comparison of the USA today is comparable to Rome before its fall (Schechter 358). Government loans are comparable to “mafia loan” because of their outrageous interest rates. In Debt We Trust shows behind the scenes of what the big banks and credit card companies do to their targets. It also demonstrates how advertising can be a seducing and powerful trap (Schechter 358). For the credit card industry, the newest target is the lower class. Steve Barnett, a former credit card company
The charge about the old days of the American economy—the nineteenth century, the “Gilded Age,” the era of the “robber barons”—was that it was always beset by a cycle of boom and bust. Whatever nice runs of expansion and opportunity that did come, they always seemed to be coupled with a pretty cataclysmic depression right around the corner. Boom and bust, boom and bust—this was the necessary pattern of the American economy in its primitive state. In the US, in the modern era, all this was smoothed out.
In 2012 Robert Applebaum composed an article saying that the administration ought to pardon a percentage of the understudy credit obligation a portion of the general population in this nation have racked up, Kayla Webley broke down his article and after that thought of her own reasons why forgetting the obligation would be a terrible thought. Her article was exceptionally powerful in demonstrating, the way that generous the credits would put the nation in a bad position than it as of now is and it would send the wrong message to individuals in this nation the individuals who went/are attending a university and the individuals who didn 't/won 't. Applebaum construct his article in light of his own motivation and utilized his own figures and "certainties" to go down his article. While Webley utilized and cited data from trusted/master sources. Webley demonstrated that Applebaum article is false and has numerous defects in the rationale utilized and she did as such capability and in an exceptionally powerful manner.
The American economy grew by a staggering seven percent, and the loans credited to consumers was responsible for this. Once businesses discovered they could boost their margins exponentially if they gave out credit to customers, the spending began. America looked
In the book, Hamilton’s Blessing, Gordon’s premise is that the national debt of the United States has become so high that concerned individuals no longer think of it. Gordon uses economic history and theory to explore the start, rise and decline of the United States Debt. The first sentence in his book reads “The United States was born in debt.” The book traces the ‘curse’ of the national debt dating back from 1792 when Alexander Hamilton proposed the virtues of America’s debt. Gordon offers a ‘biography’ of the debt making the book a human drama as he explains the positive myriads ways that it has influenced and shaped the history of America economy.
Louis Hyman is the author of Debtor Nation, he is the assistant professor of history at IRL School of Cornell University. This book was published in 2011, by the Princeton University Press. Debtor Nation is about the growth of debt throughout the 20th Century. It explains how Americans gained more credit and acquired much debt.
It starts off by explaining what exactly this excerpt from the book Strapped is going to be about. “Most graduates 20 years ago expected to leave college with some student-loan debt along with their newly earned diplomas. But many of
Upon writing the essay, I decided the do it on the second prompt. I felt that my strengths lied on the my previous knowledge from past classes about learning about various debts and the Great Depression, which I formulated my future effects in the essay. I however, had a hard time deciding whether student debt alone may be significant enough to cause an entire turmoil of the economy, but I later thought that It possibly could in a more insidious way. The causes in the essay provided me the most difficulty.
The Credit Card Industry?s Role in Causing Student Debt, author, Carlos Macias, warns his audience that credit card companies will try anything and everything to get students to own a credit card from their company. Macias states that college students have a huge target on their back when it comes to credit
He further claims that paying off debt is a component of “establishing personal responsibility” (HofferNew). Furthermore, HofferNew uses the perception of personal responsibility as a way to show that paying off said debt could help build independence. He believes in the idea of having some relief for college students considering debts are at an all time high, but he claims the idea of having it pardoned does not help students build independence and prepare them. He further believes a solution in having debt forgiven is to ensure students are required to perform public service in exchange for debt to be paid off. Likewise, he argues that this will benefit students more than just having debt paid off, but to also show the students they are “connected to a system beyond self-interest” (HoffnerNew).
The biggest enemy to the end of the financial crisis and the beginning of an economic recovery is Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson himself. Lets forget for a minute that the decision by Paulson and Bernanke to let Lehman Brothers fail was the precipitating event leading to credit markets freezing up and the first round of financial panic. Since then, the two have been working diligently to correct this collosal mistake. But separating actions from words, we see that words are in fact much more potent. Since the end of September, every time Henry Paulson has opened his month, the Dow has dropped on average 196 points.
There is many people that go to college, but because of the cost they don't get through college. The elevated costs of college cause not only students to struggle paying for college, but also to struggle financially paying for college when they are done. In many cases, after graduating, young adults who don’t find a job will become poorer, increasing the gap between the rich and the
In the article “Debt Education: Bad for the Young, Bad for America”, Jeffrey J. Williams explains the damage student debt causes past and present college students. Williams argued that more than half of the college students and their families are in debt from having to make such large payments toward the rising costs of colleges. Though, Williams also states a higher degree or education will lead to a high income and all around better jobs, the risk of being unemployed after college is too great. This is considered to be good for individuals, as it will maximize their economic potential. It is also good for society as a whole as people are getting better education, and rising to greater expectations in the world.
Thus, it stands to reason that the article’s purpose is to support the argument that predatory lending practices are at fault for the debt young adults experience. Macias uses personal experience immediately peppering in researched data to support his findings and conclusions on how the credit card industry wholeheartedly takes advantage of young America. His article captures the reader’s focus by appealing to pathos and tugging at pity in the reciting of how Macias was taken advantage of by credit lenders. Carlos Macias’s argument for the debt accrued by college aged adults being the fault of the credit card companies themselves roots itself in his rhetoric. From his skillful hooking of the audience with information garnered from personal experience to the utilization of logos throughout the paper presenting itself as careful and reliable research.
Loans allow receiving a college education seem like a smoother process considering that such a hefty amount to pay is divided so that it can be paid for in moderation. Despite the fact that it’s split into many payments, it’s still a large quantity all in all so unless indebted students aim for high income jobs, there would many years of difficulty to come after college. For this reason, undergraduates make it their goal to go after jobs which would prevent them from being constantly pressured to pay off debt. Thus, student debt is both a crisis and a reason to encourage persistence towards greater ambitions (Hillman, 41). It is a tremendous thing when a student seeks to be financially comfortable or even rich in the future but not when it is for the wrong reasons.
Again, failure to adhere to your fiscal responsibility, especially when it comes to credit cards, will result in perceived exploitation. Finally, young consumers build their social status in the process of growing up and view credit cards as a tool towards achieving this goal (Lim et al., 2014). Young consumers are spending beyond their means and then rationalizing their mistakes by claiming they’ve been exploited. In addition to consumer’s habits, the perceived exploitation is based upon consumer knowledge or financial literacy.