Analysis Of My Struggle With Anti-Intellectualism By Paul Stoller

638 Words3 Pages
Critics of Higher Education Just like the past, individuals have cared about education in the university. Bachelors' degree is an excellent credential that the society members seem to be proud. Issues regarding the traditional educational ideas are argued forcefully by two scholars; Paul Stoller and Charles Murray.
Paul Stoller is a profound professor of Anthropology. His work is commonly recognized and known. Stoller's publications range from ethnographies, biographies, memoirs and novels. In his recent blog, "My struggle with anti-intellectualism," Paul Stoller, emphasizes the need for students to reason critically. Most students have the old paradigm of college perception. If one attends college and invests much money in the education degree, they in return acquire the aids to land on a well-paying job. According to Stoller, the society seemed to have ignored the sociocultural alignment to the world. Critical thinking is a waste of time to most students. Most individuals
…show more content…
Most learners find the life in college to be fun, except the option of the boring classroom. In the real sense, college is only appropriate for a small percentage of the young adults; those who possess an IQ that is large enough to accommodate the college work level that they wish to undertake. Individuals who attend colleges are not very superior to others that fail to attend. The two groups are relatively different in terms of interests and abilities. Murray argues that one day he hopes that the society members will view college according to his perception. Murray adds that by modelling education on professional practices, students can attain a right approach to knowledge and skills delivery that assist them to think deeply on complicated matters (Murray,
Open Document