ipl-logo

Analysis Of Otto Wels Speech

935 Words4 Pages

In this source analysis, I will look into the speech given by German Social Democrat, Otto Wels on March 23, 1933. It should also be mentioned that Thomas Dunlap translated this speech into English, which will be the primary source for this essay. The speech given by Wells was in protest to Hitler’s Enabling act; a law that would help provide Hitler and his followers with a legal path towards a dictatorship. The vote for the enabling act and the speech given by Wells, were held in the Reichstag on the same day, but as history has shown, Hitler’s Nazi Party prevailed, and the democratic makeup of the Weimer Republic was washed away. The significance of this speech is quite prevalent today, in retrospect to the grisly past of the Third Reich, …show more content…

For one, I’m sure many who held the same political opinion as Wells thought he was insane, as Hitler was purging the government of anyone who didn’t align with his ideologies. Secondly, many probably considered him brave and heroic, as all 94 SPD member voted to against the act. Today, I would imagine this is the sentiment that follows, considering the repercussions that followed within the next seven years. On the other hand, the opposing parties, such as the NSDAP and the old elites, more than likely considered this propaganda to halt their “socialist” revolution. With that being said, Wells went into exile, like many other of his fellow social democrats, and were in fact deprived of their …show more content…

However, since the context of the speech deals with such a controversial time in history, I think its best viewed as a relic of the Weimar Republic. This relic is a symbol of the crisis faced during the Weimar experimentation of democracy, and what many will view as a battle of good vs. evil. What makes this document so sentimental and powerful, is the destruction that follows. Obviously Otto Wells couldn’t not have knows everything that was to follow this speech, but, since we have the luxury it makes this speech all the more powerful; arguably more powerful today, then at the time. In the end, a short analysis of Wells speech provides the reader with a unique perspective of the tumultuous times leading up to Hitler dictatorship. When understanding the context and function of the speech, it opens up new avenues into Germany history, and a deeper appreciation of its merit. By understanding these elements of the source, it allows the reader to have a clearer interpretation of the text as a whole, and a better understanding of the environment in which it was

Show More
Related

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of The Speech 'I Express My Shame'

    611 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Gerhard’s speech, “I express my shame” the speaker is deeply sadden by the German’s actions during World War II. He voice how he is hurt by the evil deeds that were committed by his own race. Through persuasives strategies he wants to inform people that not everyone supported the German’s action during the war. He is ashamed that these doings can never be erased in the pages of history. His personal connections to the holocaust gives his speech a more emotional effect.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Nation And Race By Adolf Hitler

    1592 Words  | 7 Pages

    Critically Analyze an Excerpt from Main Kampf (Volume 1, Chapter 11) by Adolph Hitler In (Volume 1, Chapter 11) of Main Kampf, Adolf Hitler discusses “Nation and Race” in attempts to distinguish the Aryan race from the inferior race, the Jewish. He presents his claim by using anti-Semitic imagery, which is a form of discrimination against Jewish people (anti-Semitic, 2016). He also uses propaganda to convince the masses to follow his sophism. This paper will review (Volume 1, Chapter 11) titled “Nation and Race”, and will evaluate the persuasive techniques used by Adolf Hitler while applying rhetorical analysis.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Elie Wiesel's Perils Of Indifference

    916 Words  | 4 Pages

    Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor, Nobel Laureate and the author of Night, gave the speech “Perils of Indifference” on April 12, 1999 during the Millennium Lecture series which was hosted by President Bill Clinton and First Lady Hillary Clinton. According to Bill Clinton “The White House millennium program will guide and direct America's celebration of the millennium by showcasing the achievements that define us as a nation -- our culture, our scholarship, our scientific exploration," going into the new twenty-first century. Wiesel was invited to Lecture to speak about the horrific Holocaust which happened during the years 1933-1945 and to try help move on from the past it as the world goes into a new millennium. In the summer of 1944, Wiesel

    Read More

  • Noah S. Sweat Speech Analysis

    479 Words  | 2 Pages

    Linguistics Being supposedly made up on the spot, Noah S. Sweat did not have time to compose an eloquent speech about a controversial topic. He instead spoke a purely unfactual and highly descriptive banter using doublespeak to voice his opinion of whiskey. Both sides of his argument include impactual adjectives to describe the drink. Or as Mr. Sweat would say on line 6, “the devil’s brew,” or on line 12, “the philosophic wine”. Each side of his argument is entirely one sentence long, implying that he emotionally fuels his speech as he works out his thoughts with the audience as one thought flows to the other.

    Read More

  • The Stability Of The Economy Of 1924-9 For Germany

    833 Words  | 4 Pages

    The years of 1924-9 for Germany were years of deceptive stability. Stability refers to a well established and firm state. In this context, stability within Germany would be a firmly established political system, a strong economy, no threats from external forces and no major divisions which would have massive implications on Germany. Germany appeared to be in a state of economic recovery but had concealed the ulterior fundamental problems that continued to exist. Germany’s economy as an entirety and parts of German society were still suffering.

    Read More

  • Bartolome De Las Casas Speech Analysis

    291 Words  | 2 Pages

    This source was written in 1542, and this speech was given to the people of the country of Spain. The Martolome De Las Casas, the lord Prince of Spains don Felipe gave this speech to the people. Giving this speech, the Prince shows how horrid the idea of the Christians killing and destroying the Indies. The Christians represent the English and the Indies are the Indians. The Christians invaded North America and stole the Indians’ gold, food, and killed a multitude of them: “The cause for which the Christians have slain and destroyed so many and such infinite numbers of souls, has been simply to get, as their ultimate end, the Indians’ gold of them, and to stuff themselves with riches in a very few days, and to raise themselves to high estates...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech

    1362 Words  | 6 Pages

    In 1986, the Nobel Prize in Literature was awarded to Elie Wiesel for his book Night, a memoir of his experience during the Holocaust. His acceptance speech was intended to ensure that the events of the Holocaust were not echoed in the future; that no human being would be subjected to the same torment that he was. Malala Yousafzai was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2014 for her fight for the right to education of children and all young people. In her acceptance speech, Yousafzai shows great knowledge about the subject, and through touching stories and comments on her assassination attempt by the Taliban, she reaches out to people from all over the world. Through the use of rhetorical appeals and techniques, both authors manage to get their messages across.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech

    552 Words  | 3 Pages

    Elie Wiesel Rhetorical Speech Analysis Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor and winner of a Nobel peace prize, stood up on April 12, 1999 at the White House to give his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”. In Wiesel’s speech he was addressing to the nation, the audience only consisted of President Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, congress, and other officials. The speech he gave was an eye-opener to the world in his perspective. Wiesel uses a variety of rhetorical strategies and devices to bring lots of emotion and to educate the indifference people have towards the holocaust. “You fight it.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Ronald Reagan's Speech At The Brandenburg Gate

    489 Words  | 2 Pages

    The audience is living with “... barbed wire, … dog runs, and guard towers.” This compels the audience to look at their unwarranted condition and drive them to question how to resolve the situation. Furthermore, Regan reminds the audience that the Soviets are to blame. By insisting that the changes in the Soviet state” ... intended to raise false hopes?” Regan has the German people recollect who is responsible for their dire situation.

    Read More

  • Max And Liesel Analysis

    465 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Occasionally he brought the copy of Mein Kampf and read it next to the flames, seething at the content. The third time he brought it, Liesel finally found the courage to ask her question. ‘Is it—good?’ He looked up from the pages, forming his fingers into a fist and then flattening them back out. Sweeping away the anger, he smiled at her.

    Read More

  • Spiro Agnew Speech Analysis

    821 Words  | 4 Pages

    On November 13th, 1969, Spiro Agnew, who was the Vice President at the time, gave the speech, Television News Coverage, about how news producers are becoming too powerful (Bibliography.com.) To successfully inform his audience, he uses many rhetorical strategies to keep everyone engaged and attentive. Agnew delivered an exceptional speech by using multiple techniques such as analogies, anaphoras, parallelism, and rhetorical questions to justify this problem to his audience. To help his audience understand what is being addressed, Agnew uses analogies to connect his ideas to familiar objects.

    Read More

  • Elie Wiesel's Book Night And The Perils Of Indifference

    881 Words  | 4 Pages

    This book explains the perils of indifference by telling us about how much the Jews suffered and the fact that no one felt the need to act upon these abhorrent actions by the Nazis immediately. This marks the point where I will begin talking about Elie Wiesel’s book Night and how it drives

    Read More

  • Nazi Germany As A Totalitarian Government

    1340 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Third Reich, referring to Hitler’s reign and Germany being under Nazi rule between the years 1933-1945, is often referred to as a totalitarian state. A totalitarian state is a system of government in which all power is centralized and does not allow any rival authorities, and the state controls every corner of individual lives with absolute power. Nazi Germany has been referred to as an excellent example of this type of government. This essay will analyse five aspects of Nazi Germany to determine whether it truly exhibited the totalitarian style of government.

    Read More

  • How Did Hitler Use Propaganda Terror And Repression

    1395 Words  | 6 Pages

    Nazism significantly impacted the propaganda, terror and repression in a time of the abolition of the Weimar and rising of Hitler. The German civilization was greatly affected German people from 1933-1939 making the ideology of Nazism change most facets of life. The underlying nature of the anti semitic and nationalist theme amongst the media was a supplement to a large portions of society 's initial views. By the 30th of January 1933, Hitler had been appointed Chancellor. The intentions to commit to the ‘Final Solution’ was obvious when he used propaganda, terror and repression in order to influence and persuade his actions, therefore justifying it to himself and others he took authority over.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Death Dealer By Primo Levi

    1775 Words  | 8 Pages

    Analyzing Hoss’ childhood to his time in prison is very important because it shows how Hoss was shaped into obeying orders from higher authority and how he developed a sense of duty and devotion to protecting Germany. Hannah Arendt, the author of Origins of Totalitarianism, explains that National Socialism was a totalitarian ideology that built itself on the idea that higher authority from Himmler and Hitler was never to be judged whether they were right or wrong because by following these orders

    Read More

More about Analysis Of Otto Wels Speech

Open Document