In Corinth for instance, the people overthrew the oligarchy because of their harsh rule. Only in one state was there a stable oligarchic rule, Sparta. The Democracy The democracy is the type of rule where power is in the hands of the people. The word democracy comes from the Greek terms demos (meaning people) and kratos (meaning
Ancient Greek Forms of Government Introduction to the Various Forms of Government Ancient Greece has experienced numerous forms of government throughout the years. The five forms of government that I will compare and contrast are monarchy, oligarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, and democracy. All of these words derived from Greek origins but they are all very different. Monarchy The word monarchy is originated in Greece and comes from the terms monos (meaning: single) and arkhein (meaning: rule). A monarchy is therefore a form of government in which the power is in the hands of one person.
The Romans had a system of indirect democracy where the people had the power to vote for representatives who would advocate for them on the state level. The Greeks had a government in which the people directly were involved in the governmental and legislative process. In addition, both systems were flawed in their representation of their people in their respective governments through neglecting a large portion of their population. Both societies did well to create term lengths to decrease the likelihood of corruption and abuse of power through creating accountability. However, the Greek democracy was a caliber above its counterpart.
Haleh Saleh Mr. Neidich World History Period: 8 Sparta Vs. Athens Ancient Greece is a land of many city- states. Each city- state had its own government, law, rulers, and customs, also the city- states did not get along. Two of the most famous city- states are Sparta and Athens. But if anyone would have to pick one to live in most of the people would pick Sparta. Sparta is better than Athens because Spartan army was very much better and protective, girls received some education, and women had more freedom than in any other poleis.
They had to be ready for everything because if they were not ready this could be the end of his kingdom. A king’s second job had to be the most boring of them all but also the most important; this was maintaining and administering justice. The people came to the king to resolve almost everything like disputes between noblemen, appointing officials and presiding personally over major court cases. Think of kings like modern-day judges for the people in his kingdom. In fact, this job was so important that the king's role in administering justice medieval society that law and order began to fall apart whenever the king was away from his own land for a long period of time.
In 'Document C: Professor Alan Ward' the text states "Only 2% of Roman citizens usually voted." This pertains to the people voting whereas only 2% actually choose the person in Office and acted on laws and war and peace. However, 2% of the Roman citizen actually voting that doesn't mean only 2% was allowed to in actuality 40% of the population could vote and this was back when there were slavery and women didn't have rights, so 40% was quite a lot back then. Going back to the Roman Republic being a democracy, the Roman Republic was
Despite the theory that Congress is a government “Of the People, By the People, For the People,” the legislative body features only a select few individuals, most of whom reign from upper levels of society. The Constitution prescribes limited barriers to becoming a Congressional representative based on age, citizenship, and residency. Because the Senate is unofficially the upper house of the two coequal houses of Congress, Constitutional restrictions for Senate candidates are higher than those of House candidates. Where House candidates must only be 25 years of age and have been a United States citizen for seven years, Senate candidates must be 30 years old and have been citizens for nine years. Candidates for both houses must reside in the state which they seek to represent.
The Electoral College chose electorates who where most knowledgeable and informed individual who was not biased and did not have a political party would be elected in each state. The original plan did not last too long, only through 4 presidential elections, it was later changed for the second time, but had many flaws and made a mess with tiebreakers going to Congress and the Senate, also the
When Jackson entered campaigning, he relied on the opinion of the people which in turn people voted to make their voice known. 4 years later, only 6 states voted through legislature and the other states were used the people to elect instead. Jackson won in 1828 and again in 1832 due to his non-stop work ethic especially in campaigning. He was not done with his mission, he wanted to bring absolute control to the people. In fact in, Andrew Jackson and The Course of American Empire, it explains,” He (Jackson) proceeded from the idea that all offices - whether appointed or elected - must ultimately fall under the absolute control of the people”.
Athens governments get a survey from its citizen and they write the person’s name of who they think has the most power. After that, it’s counted and the person gets kicked out of their country. The Roman Empire and the Athens were very different. Each empire treated citizenship and influences differently, but Rome had the better system of citizenship. People were treated fairly, gender and social classes weren’t limited, and people who had power weren’t exiled.
Does anyone know Andrew Jackson? Andrew Jackson was the most popular president in the history of the United States. Andrew Jackson was not popular because he was elected the seventh president of United State.He was popular because he cared about all people including Native Americans. During the Age of Jackson from 1820 to 1830, Jackson saw himself as the President of the People. Andrew Jackson was a president that considered a democratic because he gives the rights to people, elected by people and saw everyone equal.
In the past, the most efficient way to give citizens around the country an opportunity to vote was the electoral college, or so the founding fathers thought. Nonetheless, the electoral college should be abolished because citizens’ votes should all count equally all states should get the same attention from presidential candidates, and everyone’s voice should be heard. The electoral college system ultimately fails the citizens of bigger states because their votes don’t count as much as those in smaller states. How? Well, as previously mentioned, there’s 538 electors who are distributes
Rome becomes a Republic in 510 B.C.E after overthrowing the Etruscans, and at the same time the Athenians were in a Revolution. Rich patricians ran the Senate and the courts, their votes counted more than the lower class. Both men and women were citizens, but only men could vote and the lower class were still able to participate in voting but counted less than the wealthy class. In 449 B.C.E., the government leaders made their laws into 12 great tablets, which were carved onto them. The Twelve Tables were their first laws put in writing, the laws guaranteed every citizen equal treatment under the law, but to some people in this time might seem bad or cruel.
It was supposed to be a check-and-balance system in the voting process and was not supposed to cause any further complications. However, the Electoral College turned out to be a mere but powerful formality. It was created because the Founding Fathers needed a compromise that would balance out the power between the big and small states. Back in the day, the difference in population between the large and small states was just ten to one. Even cities, such as New York City, had only 33,000 citizens residing in it.