Plato's Theory Of Ideas Analysis

1411 Words6 Pages
Plato is one of the most popular philosophers in history due to his significant contribution to philosophy. Amongst his main theories that shaped the world of philosophy is the great Theory of Ideas. His opinions about music, religion and several other things that exist in this world relate to this Theory of Ideas. According to Plato, reality always comes in two distinct realms. The first reality is the one involving the physical world. His perception of the physical world realm is the one we perceive or view with our five common senses. On the second realm of reality, the world comprises of eternal and perfect ideals of forms. He believes that this kind of forms existing in the world, apart from being eternal, they are perfect, non-degradable,…show more content…
This is the same. At most, we can see the object part, but we cannot see its core. Taking, for instance, a beautiful thing, we can see that something like a flower is beautiful because it possesses beauty. However, we are only limited to seeing the beautiful flower, but we cannot see the beauty itself. Thus, Plato explained that the two are independent even though they relate to one another. Beauty in itself is a property shared by most things and objects apart from just a flower. That means several things can be beautiful, which makes Plato claim that in that sense there must be something shared in common. That is beauty, which we hardly perceive in our sense. Some properties such as beauty according to Plato are universal and manifest themselves in several items or objects. Nonetheless, these properties are independent of the object they manifest themselves. The same specific things or objects are prone to destruction, but the property in them remains unaffected. Therefore, Plato’s conclusion is that particular things share specific properties, but they are independent of each other. However, Plato’s argument portrays several weaknesses that one can use to object his claims. Analyzing the theory critically portrays such weaknesses that we can use to object and even criticize the theory of…show more content…
Apparently, from nature, this claim is easily qualified because forms like beauty exist in the different object. We refer to those things that fascinate our eyes as beautiful and those all those objects containing beauty are similar by that fact. In another instance, others may argue out that concerning the limit of things in this world containing forms, there are no limits on the properties that connect them vary greatly. Almost things in this natural world contain that common qualitative factor that connects them to one
Open Document