”The death of Tommy Grimes” is a story written by R.J Meaddough in 1962. In this essay, I will do an analysis of story, and then a comparison on how the main character is gaining experience through killing, as it is portrayed in this story, and in ”Just Like That”. ”The death of Tommy Grimes” is a story about the twelve-year-old boy Tommy and his father, also known as Pa. The story takes place in Mississippi,” But he smiled happily as the feeling of the warmth like Mississippi sunshine” (p. 23 l.8-9). It also takes place an early morning,” The sun had not yet risen” (p.19 l. 2). We get no introduction of Tommy or his father in the beginning of the story, meaning that the story starts in media res. The first time we are introduced to Tommy is in a flashback (Starts on p.19 l. 8). We hear about Tommy’s father Pa instructing him while shooting. His father is pushing him by saying,” Why did not you shoot? What you waiting on? What is wrong with you, boy? ”. However, Tommy struggles with pulling the trigger. He cannot do it (p. 19 l. 14). Afterwards Tommy practices his shooting …show more content…
However, the stories have similar themes, for example, killing, shooting and hunting are the main points. In addition, both of the main characters loses their innocence and gains experience through killing/shooting/hunting. However, in different ways. The main character in “Just Like That” realizes that killing is wrong and it doesn’t make you a man. He tries to impress the man but he doesn’t really care. Whenever he saw the man kill a kangaroo, something inside the boy dies,” He waited until the man shot the kangaroo in the brain. Something inside the boy died”. Exactly like how Tom Grimes told Tommy that something inside you always dies. Tommy does not enjoy killing, but it is something he feels is a duty due to his father’s expectations of him. Tommy experiences that killing a black man was required for him to be a
Kevin O’Rourke The Strange Death of Silas Deane History is never set in stone, nor is covered by the shadows of murky waters, history is in the “eye of the beholder” meaning it is the sole purpose of the individual and the job of the historians to interpret documents such as letters, decrees, bills, speeches, and photos to visualize the events that have occurred in the past. History, in context, is the study of the past, but looking much deeper into the past reveals that history is much deeper, there are hidden occurrences of nettle and happiness in which the people of today can relate too. The backgrounds and various cultures of today can interpret history in different ways all rooting back to their culture religion, or moral ideology,
They are similar because both of the protagonists are trying to rebel against the conformity that is endorsed upon the communities. They are also different because the protagonists handle their protests in very different ways. This is why both texts are similar and
At least once in their life, people make a decision, and grow to eventually regret what they have done and reflect on what could have been done instead. In the passage “The Rattler” the speaker recalls the time when he crosses paths with a snake and has to debate whether to kill the snake. The author invites the reader to feel empathy for the man and sympathy for the snake using the point of view of the man, attitude of the snake, and descriptions of the setting. The author demonstrates empathy for the man through his appreciation for nature, justification for killing the snake, and his remorse after its death.
Some similarities are small, like the magic talking fish; but others, like the underlying motivation to be happy, are very important to the morals of the stories. Both Sergei and the fisherman want to be happy, Sergei wants to be happy alone on quite fishing trips, while the fisherman wants to be happy with his wife. The morals, even though they are tied together, are fairly different. For example, the theme of ‘What of This Goldfish, Would you wish’, doing the right thing, no matter the cost, is not the same as be grateful, which is the theme of ‘The Fisherman and His Wife’. Other differences include: the consequences, setting, and major character motivations.
The similarities in both pieces begin with the vague dialogue we begin to read with very little detail or depth between both couples. In “Hills Like White Elephants" actually start to
One of the most important similarity is that both stories are well enjoyed over generations and teach great life lessons that serve the sole purpose of the
The demonstration of the narrator's imagination unconsciously leads his own thoughts to grow into a chaotic mess that ultimately ends in a death. By murdering, it’s his own way of finding peace. He is portrayed as being a sadist, sick man with an unnatural obsession for
It lay very still... Rat Kiley was crying. He tried to say something, but then cradled his rifle and went off by himself.” (75) This event had caused Kiley to
History has a tendency to be biased. Always told from the apparent side of the ‘good’. From the British being the bad guys in the Revolutionary War, to the idea, that terrorism raised because of the War in Iraq, the media, as well as other sources, tends to be biased towards the side that we, as humans, are more likely to be able to relate with. However, the untold side of the story is always the one with more facts, and it is the one that is truly the key to figure out motive. The book, Chasing Lincoln’s Killer, written by James Swanson is one, such text that reports how the man who assassinated Abraham Lincoln, John Wilkes Booth, created his plan and the manhunt that followed.
In Sherman Alexie’s poem, “Capital Punishment” he talks about an Indian male in prison, and his last meal. Sherman Alexie choose to write this poem because he is showing a little of himself through this prisoner. He is able to relate to the poem more because he uses himself as a lens for his story. Alexie had a troubled childhood and ended up becoming a writer and has written many poems and stories that seem to be very violent and dark. He chooses to write the way he does because he can get more into his stories since they are based on his life.
Even though both of these stories include the theme of reaching for something you don’t quite have may be in place in totally different texts that use their imagery in different ways, you can still find similar themes in both pieces of
For example, there are antagonists in both of the stories. But there are many more similarities than that. Similarities In the story “Three Billy Goats Gruff” there are two different countries telling the story. One is Norway, and the other country is Poland/Germany.
Although, they have similarity, the two stories has major differences also. First, both author differs the way they introduce and develop their lead characters to the reader. Second, they also differ in perspective from which their stories are being told. Third, they differs on the choice of settings and how it impact to the stories.
The only similarity between the two is that a great wrong is done by each, yet how each character chooses to handle these wrongs is a testament to their character,
They both relate to each other in a couple of ways how the main characters in both stories hallucinate and have an ambition for something.