Innocent Until Proven “Guilty”
The United States justice system promises things like the right to a fair trial and a public defender if one is not able to afford a lawyer of their own. However, one thing that the public is not promised is protection from themselves. Scott O. Lilienfeld's 50 Great Myths Of Popular Psychology states that a common misconception is that "virtually all people who confess to a crime are guilty of it." Through my reading and extended research, I have discovered a vast amount of information pertaining to false confessions. Although I knew this to be a myth, due to today's society desire for simple answers, it does not surprise me that this myth is so widely believed. Therefore, I believe it is an important topic to be researched and analyzed.
There are thousands of other sources that are able to support Lilienfeld's claim. In the article "A Rare Look at the Police Tactics That Can Lead to False Confessions" the author Gretchen Gavett explains how false confessions can be coerced out of innocent suspects. In a 2008 murder case policed locked the mother of the victim, the main suspect, in an interrogation room for several hours. They presented Ms. Trung with false evidence, acted
…show more content…
The article "Why Do Innocent People Make False Confessions?" by Charles Montaldo explains other motives behind false confessions. One of the most prominent motives is the fame that comes with high profile cases. When famous aviator Charles Lindbergh was kidnapped there were over 200 people that came forward as the perpetrator just to obtain there 15 seconds of fame. Montaldo explains these confessions stem from a pathological obsession for public attention. The article also mentions other motives such as protecting the real criminal and the hope that if they are convicted that their sentence will be
His confession was an instrumental coerced confession. The police stated that they had evidence that would convict him, and that he would get a lighter sentence if he willingly confessed. List any extenuating circumstances that might have contributed to this false confession (other than those covered within the definitions of the various types of confessions).
If a person is quite young, possesses lower than average intelligence, and has no criminal background or knowledge of criminal proceedings, it is less likely that they confessed voluntarily. A court will likely find that because Ryker is quite young, possesses lower than standard intelligence, and has no criminal background, it is less likely that her confession was voluntary. 3. No. When officers use threats and coercion to encourage the accused to confess, it is less likely that the accused confessed voluntarily.
Confession might seem imprudent to a suspect who is sure of his own innocence. In many cases, the confessor would mourn in tears for the court and town’s
Guilty Until Proven Innocent Today’s justice system claims that, you are innocent until proven guilty, yet they confine the so called guilty person until they can prove their innocents. On Native American reservation tribal courts don't have jurisdiction to prosecute non-tribal personnel for crimes committed like sexual assault and rape that occurs on the reservations. The tribal criminal justice systems have limited resources, little to no back from the local law enforcement and almost no funding from the federal government to help improve on these problems. Louise Erdrich shows this through Bazil, a tribal judge and how the legal system fails his family.
As Damien Echols once said “In the US, from the time you’re old enough to speak you hear about how you’re innocent until proven guilty and you have all these rights. Part of me was still thinking that someone’s going to put an end to this, someone’s going to stop and do the right thing.” (Damien Echols) Everyone has the right to a fair trial, unfortunately that’s not always the case. In a community blinded by stereotypes three boys, from West Memphis, Arkansas, we’re wrongly accused for the gruesome murders of three eight-year-old boys.
Since the founding of our judicial system there have always been individuals claiming innocence to a crime that they have been found guilty of, traditionally, after their sentencing no matter how innocent they may or may not be would have to serve, live and possibly die by the decision of their peers. The Innocence Project, founded in 1992 by Barry C. Scheck alongside Peter J. Neufeld faces this issue by challenging the sentencing of convicted individuals who claim their innocence and have factual ground to stand upon. The Innocence Project uses the recent advances in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing to prove their client’s innocence by using methods that were not available, too primitive or not provided to their clients during their investigation,
The police then determine if the suspect is guilty and continuously interrogate, accuse, and even threaten the suspect for hours until they confess, whether they are guilty or not. On many occasions the people who are coerced into false confessions are have severe mental impairments that prevent them from functioning as a normal person with out the impairments would.
When on trial for a serious crime or felony, there are multiple things at stake; the person’s life, reputation, freedom, and, possibly, his or her own morality. If that person is found guilty, then they will receive a selected amount of time in jail or prison. However, if found not guilty than all charges will be dropped. It is quite clear that if someone’s life of freedom was at risk, then that person would do anything to convince the jury that he or she is not guilty. They possibly even lie under oath.
In 1936, Charles Lindbergh Jr, the most famous baby of the era, was kidnapped. After a two year search, the police arrested a German immigrant, by the name of Bruno Richard Hauptmann, for committing the crime of the century. However, this man was innocent, for he did not commit this aghasting crime. Instead, John Knoll, Isidor Fisch, James Warburg, and Violet Sharpe are guilty. To prove this point, police tampered with some of the evidence to make Hauptmann look guilty.
With millions of criminal convictions a year, more than two million people may end up behind bars(Gross). According to Samuel Gross reporter for The Washington Post, writes that also “even one percent amounts to tens of thousands of tragic [wrongful conviction] errors”(Gross). Citizens who are wrongfully convicted are incarcerated for a crime he or she did not commit. Many police officers, prosecutors, and judges are responsible for the verdict that puts innocents into prison. To be able to get exonerated many wait over a decade just to get there case looked at, not many are able to have the opportunity of getting out.
Wrongful convictions are one of the most worrisome and tragic downsides to the Canadian Criminal Justice System. As stated by Campbell & Denov (2016). “cases of wrongful convictions in Canada call into question the ability of our criminal justice system to distinguish between the guilty and innocence” (p. 226). In addition, wrongful convictions can have devastating repercussions on the person, who was found guilty, effecting their personal/public identities, beliefs and family lives. This essay will be examine some of the common factors that apply to the conviction of an innocence person.
The principle in law that one is innocent until proven guilty has created much discourse. There are those who feel that the moment that one is arrested, there is reasonable belief that they committed the crime. However, there are those who feel that just as the principle states, one is, and should be taken as a victim and the outcome could be either way: guilty or not guilty. In fact, this argument is supported by the many cases of malicious prosecutions and mistaken identities.
The Social Psychology of False Confessions: Compliance, Internalization, and Confabulation is a study conducted by Saul M. Kassin and Katherine L. Kichel of Williams College. This experiment explores social influence and the impact it has on confessions. As a fundamental right in the United States, people are given several rights and if broken, various punishments can be implemented. Criminal confessions are usually self-incriminating or coerced, yet these can easily be swayed by other factors. Social influence can directly affect suspects and can potentially cause people to confess to crimes they did not commit.
Advantage Taken When a person is interrogated, the police do not try to make him comfortable. Their goal is to make him squirm and admit to something, thus leading to a full-blown confession. Episode four of Making a Murderer focused partially on Brendon Dassey. Brendon Dassey simply fell victim to the pressuring of the police.
“Courts have permitted the interrogators to tell the suspect that if he confesses his conscience will be comforted or they will inform the suspect’s cooperation to the court” (Richard 2008). It is unethical to promise and give hope to the suspect that will not be met in order to obtain a voluntary confession which are induced. During interrogation someone may walk in and hide his identity like being a police officer, while acting like someone else and promise the suspect that he or she is here to help and they are in good hands. Doing this is violating the rights of the suspect and should be taken into consideration, because it inflicts the mind of a suspect. If the suspect is going to confess it should be voluntary not being forced to “voluntary