Many people are wondering if it is a good idea to remove the confederate flag. Selwyn Duke’s 2015 article “Keep the Confederate Flag Flying” explains the symbolic relevance of the confederate flag and gives reasons why it should remain flying. On the other hand, the 2015 article “Take Down the Confederate Flag, Symbol of Hatred” written by the Editorial Board expressed a view that was different from Selwyn Duke. In this article, the author gave examples of why the confederate flag should be removed. In the article, American Thinker, Selwyn Duke, personified himself as an expert on why the confederate flag should remain flying. He asked the question, “Is removing the flag really a good idea (Duke)?” He wrote that the movement to remove the flag is the results of a nation that is sensitively responding to atrocious acts of crimes. He gave additional examples of when poor decision making resulted …show more content…
The writer wrote “Gov. Nikki Haley of South Carolina acted in the interest of her state and the nation (The Editorial Board).” In the article, “Take Down the Confederate Flag, Symbol of Hatred”, the attitude of the writer was pleasant and positive. Unlike Selwyn Duke, the writer did not use cynical language towards politicians. To further contrast the two articles, in American Thinker, a great portion of sarcasm was used to describe the supporters of the flag removal. In the first article, she was portrayed as a conservative who sided with Barack Obama, to do away with the confederate flag. In the second article, the writer acknowledged that “Governor Haley avoided the controversy for days, but eventually had to take a stand on the issue (The Editorial Board).” This writer seemed to be more understanding and forgiving of Governor Haley as opposed to Selwyn
In Atlanta Ga, Charlottesville Nc, and in every other formerly Confederate State in the U.S. there has been controversial debates on whether or not the current standing Confederate statues should be removed from public areas. Many people claim that a modern society should not honor the racist soldiers who fought for slavery. Others believe that preserving historical accuracy is essential to learning from the mistakes of the past. The opinions of thousands of citizens clash with one another over the debate between offense and information. I believe that it is most beneficial for the majority of people if the current Confederate monuments remain where they are.
The Golden Rule? In response to recent belief-based terrorism, the conservative Southern States finally removed Confederate flags, that symbolize white supremacy, slavery and seceding from the United States. A white man acted on his Confederate beliefs and shot and killed 9 African Americans in a Bible study. Other supporters of the Confederate flag burned a half-dozen African American churches.
The Confederate army had just gotten back from a brutal battle that they had won. They had taken many people 's lives and thought they would be welcomed to Maryland with cheers and congratulations, but all the town’s people were quiet. Until Barbara Frietchie held out the American flag, which was banned by the Confederacy. The Confederate army shot at Barbara, and shot through her flag. She continued to wave it, even as they shot at her, she knew that if she died it would not be in vain, but she didn’t die.
Revising History The removal of Confederate monuments is a controversial topic in today’s society. Some people view the monuments as a remembrance of American history and honoring the heroic acts performed by the individuals on the battlefield. Other, however, view them as memorials and symbols of hate that were meant to worship or glorify slavery, and want to see them all come down.
People may argue that the Confederate Flag is a racist hate symbol, but ultimately the flag’s roots are benign because it symbolizes history of war, southern pride, and secession of the confederate states. Being entitled to your own opinion is not wrong in itself, but once things are brought out of proportion it can harm others physically or emotionally. Learning the background of the Confederate flag can help some realize its true meaning and prevent more controversy. Throughout many years of our society, the Confederate Flag has been argued as hurtful or
Dew uses letters and speeches of the secession commissioners to assess their effect on sparkling resent and bitter emotions by the south to foster the secession movement. Dew’s central thesis is that the secessionist movement was largely motivated by racial inequality and the need to keep that as the status quo. Dew writes that a lot of the secession leaders used that as a reason for wanting the secession. He writes that, “Alabama's Leroy Pope Walker summarized that Republican rule would cost southerners first, ‘our property,’ ‘then our liberties,’ and finally ‘the sacred purity of our daughters’ (Dew, 80).
“ Are we now going to discriminate against students who are proud of their southern heritage? We cannot pick and choose.” (anonymous statement) The principal, Greg White, then states that “the banning of the confederate flag is necessary to keep the peace, i’m a Southerner
Confederate Flag Racism or Heritage The Confederate flag was a significant item throughout history, but what it was significant for varies from person to person. To some the Confederate flag represents Southern heritage while to others it signifies racism. Either opinion could be considered true, but evidence shows that it is viewed more as a symbol of racism. From one stand point the Confederate flag was the battle flag for the Southern states during the Civil War, which was virtually over slavery, but the battle flag was a symbol that was changed multiple times throughout the war.
A lot of people may not advocate the removal of the confederate monuments, but the problem is, they aren't opposed to it either. To people, the confederate soldier statues and monuments represent people protecting slavery. But confederate soldier statues and monuments represent individuals, soldiers fighting for
her exact words stated, "I cannot believe that we do not have the heart in this body,to do something meaningful, such as take a symbol of hate off these grounds on Friday. " After half a day of legislative battle, the House then passed the bill. On July 9, Haley signed the bill into law with nine pens, one for each of the victims killed at Emanuel AME Church. On July 10, two members of the South Carolina state highway patrol, took down the flag and then handed it to Leroy Smith, director of South Carolina 's Department of Public Safety. The flag now is home to South Carolina 's Confederate Relic Room and Military Museum after years upon years of
The contest is really for empire on the side of the North, and for Independence on that of the South. - London Times, November 7, 1861. The Confederate Flag should not be banned. It 's a part of Southern Heritage, part of our history. Why ban the just the Confederate Flag, when the other flags could offend someone else? I have a right to freedom of speech, to say as I please.
Pictures of the accused killer flooded television, social networks and newspapers. The displaying of the killer holding the confederate flag was displayed because of the killer’s hate for the black race. Nine people were killed in the shooting spree. The incident in my opinion was a demonic act because the killer sat and open fire while the congregation prayed. Sadly, only because of nine people dying because of racism, the flag was removed for several southern states.
Should Cities Be Allowed To Take Down Confederate Statues? What do you think about Confederate Statues? Should cities and governments be allowed to take these statues down? The city of New Orleans had this problem.
In the news today, a continual debate can be found about the significance of Confederate monuments and if they should remain or be removed. Confederate monuments that have been erected throughout the U.S. should be kept because of the preservation of America’s history. For instance, in the article, The Unbearable Lightness of Confederate-Statue Removal, the author lists how slaveholder monuments aren’t the only statues being vandalized, but the Lincoln Memorial and Mount Rushmore are other symbols of U.S. history that some believe need to “blow up” (Murdock). Every historical symbol can have both people who appreciate it and who oppose it. That doesn’t mean that we should tear down all symbols, but
“Why We Should Keep the Confederate Monuments Right Where They Are” by John Daniel Davidson is persuasive to an audience of U.S. citizens with the use of rhetorical strategies. Davidson gives the reader interest through the use of authority and expert testimony. He does this by describing President Donald Trump throughout his reading. The audience therefore becomes attracted to this text, because the mention of a big name such as the President, making this text effective. This article is also persuasive through the use of statistical evidence.