She believes that all humans should adopt a vegan or vegetarian lifestyle. In fact, Frazier states that consuming meat can “lead to spiritual disturbance and physical disease.” However, according to an article, “Side Effects of Switching to a Vegetarian Diet” written by Michael Kerr, informs readers that there are consequences for going vegan or vegetarian (01.14.14). He states that “protein is essential for the growth and maintenance of cells in the human body,” when limiting one 's protein consumption, it can cause one to feel anemic, dizzy and lethargic. Although there are other alternatives to proteins such as peas, rice, and soy products, they do not provide the same natural amino acids and vitamins that meats do. If the vegan or vegetarian does not eat a balanced diet, it can result in the inability to develop sufficient immunity cells from certain viruses and decrease in production of nail, hair, and skin cells.
In addition, to the possibility of cancer and other side effects in people, the hormones have some disastrous effects on the environment, and even on the cows themselves. Most would argue, growth hormones in beef cattle are safe due to the FDA, Food Drug Administration, testing and approving
But since we are so aware we can stay on top of it and not fall behind. Another thing that non-vegans think about veganism is, “why do vegans always look ill?” This is a very controversial topic because people don’t think vegans are healthy. But if a meat-eater didn’t manage their diet they would get sick as well. It’s all about having enough information to do it healthfully and to not get
“We risk the creation of resistant strains of bacteria in factory farm animals” (Animal Freedom). Public Health is an important key to living a healthy lifestyle. We must ensure that we keep our environment as clean as can be for the sake of our own health and for the sake of future generations. “People are increasingly suffering from chronic diseases that are connected with eating too much of the wrong sorts of food or from diseases transmitted from animals to humans” (Green Times). Because these animals are held is such close quarters, many diseases spread quickly among them, ending up in the food that we eat.
They cannot replenish fast enough, they destroy animal shelters and kill different animals, and they lead to serious health issues for humans like decreasing brain activity or cancer. For this reason, scientists are researching better solutions and so far they have found renewable rescores. These energies are reproducing faster than they are being taken away, they don’t harm animals as much as fossil fuels, they benefit humans, and contrary to popular belief, they can be made maintainable. As Barack Obama believes, “To truly transform our economy, protect our security, and save our planet from the ravages of climate change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind of
The meat industry has helped our economy become as strong as it is due the amount of people that consume it. According to an article by Zach Nold, he mentions the negatives of taking out the meat industry from our economy. He cites the EPA when he states, “The beef industry is so important that in the 2000s, it produced $49 billion annually in direct economic output” (Nold). This shows how big the meat industry is in our economy. Keep in mind, these numbers reflect only the beef industry, not including meats such as pork, chickens and other industries that produce meat.
I read that methane is an even worse greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, and cattle are a big source of methane emissions. How are they going to regulate that? Not just cattle, but dairy cows as well! That doubles the worry. Fortunately, there is really nothing to worry about, scientifically.
Producing for local costumers would make a drastic change in reduction of pollution caused by transportation of goods. Scott Matthews and Christopher Weber wrote a journal “Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States” in which they point out how scientific researches concentrate only on the pollution that livestock produces on farms, forgetting about the big impact on pollution of food transportation. Food transportation is the main factor of the green gas emission, associated with household pollution. The transportation of agricultural goods affects the air, especially air transport, but also all other ways of transports which emit exhaust gases. The ocean is affected too, by ship transport, especially when accidents happen.
When the time comes to “harvest” their flesh for meat, their deaths are executed so inefficiently that the animals often continue to struggle well into “processing”. On the other hand, some people argue that human consumption of animals should be morally accepted because, Christine Korsgaard, the Arthur Kingsley Porter Professor of Philosophy at Harvard University, questions that “What if it is not natural for animals to eat meat? How do we know? What if the only way that the growing human population can eat meat is through factory farming practices? Can we still imagine ourselves as a natural link in a chain of life when there is nothing natural about the way we raise and eat our food?
1 The problem is that people do not know that switching to vegetarianism can help reduce the causes of global warming, which means what you eat can affect how the world will be in the future. Meat production produces enormous amounts of CO2 in the air, which is a major cause of global warming, and are thus a reason to stop