ipl-logo

Analysis Of The Gospel Of Life

1075 Words5 Pages

The Gospel Of Life is Jesus’ message to all of us. God wants it to be preached as “good news“ to the people of every age and culture in this world today. We have to help spread this news, by being a true follower of Jesus Christ. The Gospel of Life is translated from Evangelism Vitae. A papal encyclical was promoted on March, 25,1995 by Pope John Paul II. This passage tells us more about human life. This includes Abortion, murder, euthanasia, and capital punishment. This reaffirms the way the church stands on said issues, especially with previous church teachings. Beginning with an overview of threats to human life both recently and in the past, the encyclical tells us a good short piece of history of the many biblical prohibitions against …show more content…

Capital punishment is known as the death penalty. This is the act when a person is put to death for a crime they committed. Evangelium Vitae states that "execution is only appropriate in cases of absolute necessity, in other words when it would not be possible otherwise to defend society." However, in today's society, with the improvement of the penal system these cases are very rare. The purpose of punishment is "to redress the disorder caused by the offense." The extent of the punishment must be examined very good and should not go to the extreme except in cases it is mandatory to do so. The Catechism states "If bloodless means are sufficient to defend human lives against an aggressor and to protect public order and the safety of persons, public authority must limit itself to such means because they better correspond to the concrete conditions of the common good and are more in conformity to the dignity of the human person." Euthanasia, murder and abortion are grave sins that the church has condemned throughout history. Evangelium Vitae was written to state the value of human life and maintains that societies and individuals should do everything in their power to keep and appreciate the life. Any type or form of killing is not acceptable and is prohibited. God has given government the power to determine when capital punishment is due. ( Genesis 9-13) Showing great joy when the death penalty is employed should not be allowed. And Christians should not fight against the government’s right to execute the perpetrators of the most evil of

Show More
Related

  • I Want Constantine's Murderer To Die Analysis

    612 Words  | 3 Pages

    He also calls attention to “...the fundamental truth of biblical anthropology: the soul that sins must die; sin incurs a debt that must be paid.” Colson has also argued the sacredness of human life. He argues that the sacredness of a human life applies to those who are still rooted in ethics, and that the death sentence is distinguishing between the criminal and the punitive

    Read More

  • Don Marquis Abortion

    128 Words  | 1 Pages

    Don Marquis’s purpose to his essay is to set out to prove that abortion is seriously wrong. He is addressing that abortion is morally wrong and should not be permitted except in certain cases. The authors thesis is “Abortion, except perhaps in rare instances, is seriously wrong”(Marquis, 754). Marquis’s purpose for exceptions or rare instances is to eliminate those instances that could be considered ethically controversial such as cases like abortion after rape or abortion during the first fourteen days after conception. Marquis provides another exception in the form of a pregnancy that could endanger a woman’s life and abortion when the fetus is anencephalic.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Why Abortion Is Immoral By Don Marquis

    1384 Words  | 6 Pages

    Essay On Why Abortion Is Immoral This article called “Why Abortion Is Immoral” written by Don Marquis argues and why abortion is prima facie impermissible. Marquis accesses both anti-abortion arguments and also pro-choicer’s claim to protect the legalization of abortion. My paper is going to understand and examine the the both sides arguments, and to attempt to recognize abortion is immoral.

    Read More

  • Mary Anne Warren's Argument Against Abortion

    1967 Words  | 8 Pages

    In this paper, I will review Mary Anne Warren’s stance on the morality of abortion and provide my objection to her view that a fetus is not a human on the basis that a fetus does not contain the characteristics, generated by Warren, to be considered a Homo sapien; therefore, warranting abortion morally acceptable. The basis of my argument against abortion is on the premise that a fetus, by the Law of Nature, is to be protected and preserved since it is considered innocent and a human being, based on the idea that a human being is something bodily and physical, an individual and a being in time (Iglesias). Mary Anne Warren defines abortion as the deliberate action to remove a fetus from a human female’s womb per her request resulting in the death of the fetus (Warren 307). By identifying what is meant by abortion before furthering her argument, Warren clearly identifies the topic of her argument so that there be no confusion.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Capital Punishment

    873 Words  | 4 Pages

    Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is a legal process in which a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime by the government of a nation. The United States is in the minority group of nations that uses the death penalty. There are thirty-three states that allow capital punishment and seventeen states that abolished it (Death Penalty Information Center). The morality of the death penalty has been debated for many years. Some people want capital punishment to be abolished due to how it can cost a lot more than life imprisonment without parole, how they think it is immoral to kill, and how innocent people can be put to death.

    Read More

  • Mary Anne Warren's On The Moral Permissibility Of Infanticide

    625 Words  | 3 Pages

    Even today, there are many moral and philosophical issues that divide the United States because they create very polarized opinions and beliefs. One such philosophical issue is the moral permissibility of infanticide. Mary Anne Warren, a philosopher, presents her liberal yet controversial views on the issue of infanticide in the postscript of her article, On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion. However, the anti-infanticide arguments pose problems for Warren’s position because they justify the immorality of infanticide through the physical similarity in resemblance of neonates to human beings. These arguments also claim that the destruction of a viable infant is needless because even if the infant’s biological parents reject the infant, there are many other parents who are willing to adopt and nurture that infant.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Essay On Don Marquis

    1739 Words  | 7 Pages

    Don Marquis, on the other side of the abortion debate begins his essay “Why abortion is immoral” through the frustration of little support being given to the thought. This essay was written to show the falsified belief that an anti-abortion stance is nothing other than irrational religious dogma or a conclusion generated by a seriously confused philosophical argument. The argument is set forth throughout that abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral. This essay sets forth the belief that abortion is in the same category as killing an innocent adult human being. Don Marquis argues with rare exceptions such as a life-threatening pregnancy, all cases of abortion are seriously wrong and are not much different than killing an adult

    Read More

  • Tim Goeglein Presentation Analysis

    831 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to him, people in the American society have changed the definition and importance attached to life. Goeglein cites that the problem of abortion has affected the American society to a great extent such that there are 5o million abortions recorded since the year 1973. Goeglein discusses in his presentation that people should be human enough to curtail abortion since it deters another life from seeing the earth. He claims that each and every person is made according to the image of Christ. Therefore, he says that no one is supposed to take the life of the other even if in the womb.

    Read More

  • Consequentialism And Abortion

    1828 Words  | 8 Pages

    Abortion can be categorized as both a legal, and ethical issue. Being such a controversial topic some might argue that abortion should be considered murder, while others simply see it as a way to get rid of a problem. Religion plays a large part in the ethical issue of abortion, just like with any other ethical problem, religion plays a large part of the decisions we make in everyday life. Keeping this in mind we can say religion, and a person’s ethical view of life plays a large part in the decision of having an abortion. In this paper I will discuss the ethical views on abortion, Marquis’s argument, and look at the different ethical views from different points of views on the topic.

    Read More

  • Ethical Issues In Abortion

    1829 Words  | 8 Pages

    Pregnancy, giving birth, and abortion are three interrelated topics. They offer moral dilemmas that aren’t easily solved or tackled. In this paper, I will discuss abortion and I will approach it from the point of view of a consequentialist, a deontological ethicist, and a virtue ethicist. I will start by defining abortion, provide some information about the reasons why women opt to abort a fetus, then give a specific example of a moral dilemma that a woman is facing, and explore the dilemma from the different points of view.

    Read More

  • Is Abortion Morally Permissible

    632 Words  | 3 Pages

    The debate whether abortion is morally permissible or not permissible is commonly discussed between the considerations of the status of a fetus and ones virtue theory. A widely recognized theory of pro-choice advocates can be thought to be that their ethical view is that fetus’s merely are not humans because they lack the right to life since they believe a fetus does not obtain any sort of mental functions or capability of feelings. Although this may be true in some cases it is not in all so explaining the wrongness of killing, between the common debates whether a fetus does or does not obtain human hood, should be illustrated in a way of a virtuous theory. The wrongness of killing is explained by what the person or fetus is deprived of, such as their right to life; not by means of a heart beat or function of one’s body, but by the fact that it takes their ability of potentially growing into a person to have the same human characteristics as we do.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Theory Of The Death Penalty

    706 Words  | 3 Pages

    Even though it is true that taking the life of another is not right, it is even truer that the punishment should fit the crime. The death penalty is an exercise of justice that promotes retribution for crime and moral punishment for those who choose to take human life. Also, it prevents society 's worse offenders from re-offending, and it provides justice for the victims whose lives were cut short without a second thought. To better understand why capital punishment is a justifiable act, Kant 's theory gives a clear and logical understanding of the eye for an eye approach. Additionally the utilitarian view also explains why capital punishment is justifiable in regards to comfort for the victim 's family and prevention of re-offending.

    Read More

  • John Stuart Mill's Arguments Against The Death Penalty

    900 Words  | 4 Pages

    The death penalty is a punishment of execution, given to someone legally convicted of a capital crime. The death penalty laws were established in the 18th century B.C when king Hammaurabi of Babylon instituted the law for 25 different crimes. In Jewish history the death penalty could only be given after trail by the Sanhedrin, which was composed of twenty-three judges. There were four different ways the death penalty was imposed on an individual, these were burning, stoning, strangling and slaying (Talmud). In today’s society most countries have abolished the death penalty due to various reasons such as unfair justice, but others still have it in place, for example some states in The United States of America.

    Read More

  • Should The Death Penalty Be Illegal Essay

    1267 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Death Penalty, loss of life due to previous crimes and actions, is believed by some to be extremely costly, inhumane, and cruel unlike some others whom believe it is just, right, and provides closure. The Death Penalty is not a quick and easy process. Most who get sentenced to deaths row wait years for their ultimate punishment of death. Some believe that it is not right to punish and kill a human for actions they have done because, they believe that the inmate should have another chance. Then others believe that it is right to punish someone for their actions especially if their actions involve killing another or multiple humans.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Capital Punishment

    1383 Words  | 6 Pages

    Capital Punishment is the death penalty for those who commit murder. The thought behind this punishment is a life for a life. There has been debate on if the death penalty is right or wrong. Some poeple want the death penalty to be illegal while others argue it is needed to deter crime. There are many valid arguments regarding the death penalty.

    Read More

More about Analysis Of The Gospel Of Life

Open Document