Have you ever heard of the toxic chemical DDT? It was a commonly used insect repellent, that is until Rachel Carson wrote about how dangerous it actually is. Rachel Carson was a writer, marine biologist, and environmentalist. She is most well known for her writing on pesticides, especially DDT, that left a huge influence on the chemical industry. Carson wrote six books in her lifetime, each dealing with some topic of ecology. Rachel Carson did most of her writing during the 1930’s through the 1960’s. “She was able to hold the audience’s attention through understandable explanations and suggestions written in a graceful, impassioned style” (“Rachel Carson” 588). Carson’s timeless writing left an impact on citizens, industries, as well as the …show more content…
In the summer of 1932 Carson “intends to pursue her Ph.D. at Johns Hopkins in marine biology, [however] lack of funds during the Great Depression forces her to drop out of graduate school” (Lear). It is possible that if Carson had attended graduate school, she may have written completely different books. “Under the Sea-Wind” received very good reviews when it was published in 1941. However, the reviews were besieged by news of the bombing of Pearl Harbor and World War II. Although the war caused the sales of her book to decline, Carson was able to learn a substantial amount of information about pesticides and the ocean through the war effort.
Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring” influenced the views of many after it exposed just how harsh the use of pesticides are. “A generation of Americans found their perspectives widened and their activism inspired by Carson’s powerful work” (Stoll). Carson’s work helped to open the eyes of citizens to how the chemicals that they were using everyday affected the wildlife and environment around them. Carson wrote in such a way that was understandable and offered many suggestions, which makes it readable even
…show more content…
“Carson showed how experts trusted their own creations too greatly and how they themselves were implicated in a vast complex of private and public interests designed to produce profits for chemical manufacturers and the growing agribusiness sector” (Stoll). Carson revealed how the industries were more about making a profit than protecting the environment. In a way, Carson woke the industry up and showed them just how much harm they were doing. “Much of the data and case studies that Carson drew from weren’t new; the scientific community had known of these findings for some time, but Carson was the first to put them all together for the general public and to draw stark and far reaching conclusions”
Carson appeals to the arousal of the basic emotions, such as the arousal of fear in the public. Carson also appeals to pathos, or the emotions, by questioning the “highly intelligent” creators of these pesticides. Carson believes irrational bad decisions based on faulty evidence threaten the future existence of mankind. “Along with the possibility of the extinction of mankind by nuclear war, the central problem of our age has therefore become the contamination of man’s total environment with such substances of incredible potential for harm-substances that accumulate in the tissues of plants and animals and even penetrate the germ cells to shatter or alter the very material of heredity upon which the shape of the future depends.” However, the statement supports Carson’s intention to present a persuasive, and logical point of view without confusing the reader; suggesting she ment to go against a patient audience rather than an impatient one.
She published many great poems regarding the B.A.M and she won many awards for her work including Woman of the Year from Ladies Home Journal. She also appeared multiple times on television and attended speaking engagements. She then went on to become a professor at College Mount St. Joseph and Virginia Tech University. The analysis of the poem
Chapter 7: Denial Rides Again: The Revisionist Attack on Rachel Carson Rachel Carson was considered an American hero in the 1960s because she called our attention to the harms of indiscriminate pesticide use. She explained how they were accumulating in the food chain, damaging the natural environment and threatening the bald eagle. Historians consider this a success story in science, however if you fast-forward to 2007 the internet is flooded with accusations that she was a mass murderer.
Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club, states that, “The EPA’s water quality study confirms what millions of Americans already know—that dirty oil and gas fracking contaminates drinking water” and that “the EPA chose to leave many critical questions unanswered” (Malewitz). It is critical that the EPA works with the general public to answer every question so that we can begin to work together to understand the complexity of this
“Today in the United States, by the simple acts of feeding ourselves, we are unwittingly participating in the largest experiment ever conducted on human beings.” Jeremy Seifert certainly knows how to get viewers’ attention, as exemplified by the film blurb describing his 2013 documentary, GMO OMG. The frightening depiction of the food industry is one of many efforts to expose consumers of the twenty-first century to the powerful organizations that profit from national ignorance and lack of critical inquiry and involvement. Seifert effectively harnesses the elements of rhetoric throughout his phenomenal argument against remaining complacent about the food industry’s act of withholding of information about genetically modified organisms from
Al Gore Jr. was the forty-fifth vice president of the U.S. and is well-known for his environmental advocacy work and his famous writings on environmental issues (Weisser 101). In his article “Climate of Denial”, he describes how the world is very uneducated on the environmental issues of today. Through his article, he uses ethos, pathos, and logos to make his point. He also clearly expresses his purpose, the conflict, and his audience. Despite these proficient skills, if we unveil the true Al Gore, we will witness a man driven for greed, wealth, and power.
During the Cold War era from 1945-1980, the environment took priority in American society. Awareness about the need to preserve the planet culminated in a nationwide Earth Day which proved the growing worry about the lack of sustainability found on Earth. Other environmental factors required immediate action to be taken before the detrimental effects of humans and their role in society would be too much for this world to handle. Although there are a variety of factors that raised awareness about the dangerous environment on earth, it was ultimately the implementation of the first Earth Day, tempting climate in the Sun Belt, and the environmental movement by Rachel Carson that brought the awareness to harsh environmental factors in the late
‘’Our past, our present and whatever remains of our future, absolutely depends on what we do now. ’’ - Sylvia Earle. Sylvia has changed the world in several ways. Sylvia Earle was born on August 30, 1935 in Gibbstown Greenwich Township, NJ. She was among the first women explorers to use underwater gear.
With the inclusion of a multitude of perspectives, experiences, and emotions outside her own, her expertise heightens allowing her to be more respected as an influential writer on the subject at
What Is a Pesticide? A pesticide is a substance used to avert, annihilate, or repulse pests. Pests can be bugs, mice and different creatures, weeds, organisms, or microorganisms, for example, microbes and infections. A few illustrations of pests are termites creating harm to our homes, dandelions in the grass, and insects on our mutts and felines.
Imagine having so much pesticides in use that people and animals were actually dying from it. In the 1950’s the overuse of pesticides was a serious problem. Rachel Carson was an activist who was against the use and overuse for these pesticides. She wanted to address this problem to the government and the public and warn about the harmful effects pesticides have on the environment and the people. In “A Fable For Tomorrow”, Rachel Carson utilizes ethos, logos and pathos in order to bring awareness to the overuse of pesticides.
In today’s world, there are many people creating new chemical substances that has negative effect to our world. Rachel Carson, in her article "The Obligation to Endure" argues that the pesticides and other chemicals we use are harmful to more than just the environment. I agree with Carson in her article, in that we should reduce most of the harmful chemical use and instead use technological inventions. Carson is a person who seems very passionate about the environment and is very concerned of its inhabitants. It is hard to believe that intelligent human beings would use bad chemicals substances that would affect the environment and themselves negatively.
According to Evo Morales, “Sooner or later, we will have to recognise that the Earth has rights, too, to live without pollution. What mankind must know is that human beings cannot live without Mother Earth, but the planet can live without humans.”. Two short stories, "Silent Spring" by Rachel Carson and "If I Forget Thee, Oh Earth" by Arthur C. Clarke, show us the terrible consequences of our actions that are affecting the environment. In the short story "Silent Spring", Carson displays the balance of nature being destroyed by humans actions.
Rachel Carson’s science was precise and her effort and determination to prove the harmful effects of pesticides was persistent and although she was not aware it was forward looking into the future of our planet. Her willpower helped shape scientists interest on the implications that chemicals and pollutants have severe impacts to our environment. Her book Silent Spring opened the eyes of many to acknowledge that many pesticides are polluting the air similar to the emissions of greenhouse gases. Fifty-five years later scientists are still battling the argument about the effects of carbon dioxide in this planet’s atmosphere. Although scientists are the experts there are many individuals, such as our current President that believe global warming
Review of Literature Environmental issues began to be discussed and debated only towards the end of the 20th century. Since then significant amount of literature has been penned down raising awareness about issues of pollution, deforestation, animal rights and several others however it has failed to result in major changes, ideas or even actions to save the environment. Several species of animals have become extinct; pollution level is at an all-time high, global warming is leading to severe climate changes all across the globe but these problems do not seem to alarm the decision makers. Leydier & Martin (2013) also states that, “despite the increasing expression of concern in political and media debates about issues such as climate change, pollution and threats to biodiversity, “political ecology” (operating at the confluence of scientific developments, political engagement and ethical debates) is still trying to find its bearings” (p.7). It is quite evident that environmental issues are not treated in equivalence to political, economic, social or even religious issues.