The article is “When DNA Is Not Destiny” by Sharon Begley appeared in the Newsweek on December 1, 2008. Begley is a professional science writer who was born in the United States and graduated from Yale University, where she received her Bachelor of Arts degree in 1977. The article discussed whether people should consist the belief of personality is immutable and decided by the genes that we born with. In the article, Begley begins by refuting Wilde’s argument that personality traits are decided at birth and plays a main role throughout one’s life that is constant and unchangeable. She grabbed reader’s attention by using a rhetorical question to imply her idea that personality could possibly change under the influence of other factors. To confirm
it’s ok, we’re not angry.’” (Benway 355). My topic of inquiry relates the effects of both genetics and upbringing on childhood development. This quote shows the correlation that parenting styles do affect how a child's personality develops, and genetics are not the only factor in personality development.
She even goes on to include her own personal opinion in which she claims she likes the accuracy of how it describes her condition. On other terms she switches to a negative approach ultimately, questioning how fit the words were to her current state. When
Who Was She? A DNA Test Only Opened New Mysteries Libby Copeland, in “Who Was She? A DNA Test Only Opened New Mysteries,” discusses the increased popularity of DNA testing, the process, and the impact the results can have on the people who choose this path. In the article, Copeland effectively uses structure, tone, word choice and other rhetoric devices to establish her purpose of informing her readers about the effects of DNA testing. Copeland writes the article not only to inform, but also to engage and interest the general public, or anyone considering DNA testing.
To the average reader, this should be enough to seal the deal and convince the reader that Mrs. Allison must know what she is speaking about. Based on the tone of this rhetorical analysis, you may wonder whether or not the author believes Mrs. Grimes article to be a good example of rhetoric, or whether the author believes it to be ineffective. This is where the difficulty comes in, this article is clearly a masterwork of emotional appeal from a credible author, however, the article lacks any substance at all, and almost all of her emotional appeals are based on inaccuracies and the
In the first paragraph, she utilizes her main rhetorical strategy. Without this tactic, she possibly would not engage many readers outside of
From the moment a person is born to the moment they die, they are constantly changing with the effects of their surroundings and their decisions. People are also influenced by their genetics, which determine hair color and other traits. These all contribute to the development of people and who they become as a whole, including their personality, values, and morals. People are influenced by many factors in life and psychology studies the human mind and its behavior throughout time. Literature and history often conveys the difference between nature and nurture in the development of people.
In the article, Are We Still Evolving, Michael White claims that culture and the environment has a impact on genetic makeup. This relates to the content of our course in which White is talking about Evolution and genetics. He writes that the act of people migrating has caused the human gene to change and change the way evolution works on human genes. This can be true. This relates to the environment having so much power in how people come to be.
In chapter twelve of Genetic Turning Points by James Peterson, the genetically engineered human growth hormone (HGH) is discussed along with the ethical controversy that surrounds its usage to alter one’s genes. For the purpose of this paper, I assume that the genetically concocted HGH is being used to treat children naturally lacking this hormone and to increase the height of children affected by Turner syndrome. I also assume that it is being used to increase the height of children whose parents fear their child may inherit their short height. In my opinion, in no circumstance do I believe that the use of genetically engineered human growth hormone (HGH) is ethical because it fosters the distorted societal outlook on physical appearance, its use is a
Libby Copeland, in “Who Was She? A DNA Test Only Opened New Mysteries”, painstakingly uncovers the ramifications of accessible genetic testing. In light of this modern practice of determining lineage, she details the relationships facilitated and losses mourned through the use of figurative language, diction, and structure. As a clever method of showing the audience many individuals’ reactions to genetic testing results, Copeland uses figurative language throughout the article to elevate drama and establish tension in the investigation.
“I suppose the genetic scientist are still hard at work trying to work out the kinks out. Hair like Fiona’s must drive them crazy.” (Lowrey 95). Reading The Giver has made me notice that the story’s conflicts are similar than the conflicts in our own world. One of The Giver’s many conflicts is the community making children the same as everyone else by messing with their genetics.
Description: I have been recently employed to Valley VNA which is nursing facility. I will be working the morning shift, during the week as a CNA. The facility is located in Neenah. As a CNA I will work the elderly by helping them get ready in the morning.
We also tend to forget the other judgement and that is us, we are also influenced in our non verbal. She became interested in power dynamic, especially in nonverbal expression in power and dominance.
That is, due to the phrases she used to describe herself, readers are not only obligated to picture the current scene but also feel empathy for the
Genotypes would form phenotypes such as the physical appearance of one. Hans Eysenck believes that personalities are determined by genes. On the other hand, Jeffrey A. Gray believes that personality is because of the brain. A case study regarding an unfortunate accident involving a metal rod that pierced through the skull resulting in a change of personality. Could personality really be affected by the brain?
The first component stated that the personality reflects individual differences. Every individual have its own characteristics. Second component is a statement that personality is consistent and enduring, and the last component claimed that personality can change. There are many factors can influence the personality development which are heredity, parental characteristic, person’s cohort, birth order, normative age-graded influences, normative history-graded influences, non-normative life events, culture, and normative socio cultural-graded influences.