More than four hundred and sixty thousand students are working for free. According to the NCAA the number of student-athletes is steadily growing. These students represent their school when they compete in their respective sport. Although all NCAA student-athletes should be paid, the football and basketball programs bring in the most revenue therefore these two sports will be the main focus of this argument. In addition, not only do these particular student athletes bring in revenue for their school, but they also bring in revenue for shoe companies, shoe companies and the conference in which their team is in (Meshefejian).
In 2008, the top 10 Division One football teams brought in a combined revenue for their schools of $1,045,275,024.
…show more content…
This is another reason why college athletes should be paid. As reported by Shelly Anderson, Jeremy Bloom was a talented football player for the University of Colorado and also a talented skier who competed in the World Cup Championships and the Olympics. “The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) ruled Bloom had violated its rules on college athletes having their own endorsement deals because Bloom accepted endorsement deals as a skier. Bloom could no longer play college football.” Due to Bloom’s tremendous skill in skiing he was offered sponsorships and endorsements. As any other person would ideally do in that situation he accepted them. The NCAA prohibits endorsements on the basis that the student-athletes are only amateurs. However, if they are only amateurs then why do schools offer them an almost-free education, worth up to two hundred and fifty thousand dollars in some cases? This ruling was also hypocritical of the NCAA, as pointed out to by Anderson, the NCAA allows student-athletes to play college football while also playing professional baseball. Bloom did not even accept an endorsement for the sport he was playing in college, in response, Bloom did challenge the NCAA but failed and the final ruling came in 2004. …show more content…
In conclusion, college athletes should be paid because they bring in a ton of revenue for their schools while risking injury and yet are unable to afford the cost of living. The time that is put into the sport is the equivalent, if not more, than the time that is put into a full time job. Only thirty-three percent of students receive scholarships, most of them partial. Also, only one percent of all college athletes will play professional sports after their college tenure is served. The NCAA and Division One Colleges generate profits that do not trickle down to the athletes. Without athletes there would be no games, and hence no money and why they should be financially
College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.
College athletes should also make money because some sports have a very short career. If the career is short, for example football, then they need to make money in college in case their career ends right out of college or they injure themselves and can never play that sport again. Having the extra money from college, they can then use it towards their backup plan if their sport career didn 't work out. Even if they do make it to the NFL the average career length is “3.3 years”(Average Playing Career) and they could injure themselves or get kicked off the team in the short time period they were with the NFL. Leaving them with barely any money to live
Student athletes produce millions every year for their respective universities without receiving a share of that income. Because of the sacrifices
College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.
That is a big reason they should get paid; paying them turns them into "employees." Eventually, turning everything into a money battle, causing the student-athletes to lose their love for the game. "Paying student-athletes would turn them into professionals… student-athletes are students first…attending college to receive an education and secondary to compete in their sport" (Drozdowski). Turning them into "employees" would shift their focus from their education which is the most important thing. According to the NCAA, fewer than 2 percent of student-athletes go pro, which results in about 98 percent of student-athletes leaving college and going into the world getting a 9-5 job.
It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.
According to the article it states “Despite rules preventing such actions, coaches, shoe executives, agents, apparel representatives, and other industry professionals often conspire to pay recruits to join a specific college it is a practice that stays out of the public eye because everyone involved benefits if no one knows about the payments using money to influence a high school student to select a specific program and hire a specific business manager is felony-level conduct allowing college athletes to be paid would help to limit this issue, which would reduce investigation costs across the board (personal finance blog par 4). What this is trying to say is Colleges that are going after these players by offering them benefits that they know they do not have in their life really gets their attention. Now if college players are allowed to receive endorsements It would stop these coaches from corrupting these kids and trying to stop stacking the program to be dominant in sports
Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.
Horace Michell in his article, “Students Are Not Professional Athletes,” and Dave Zirin in her article, “An Economist Explains Why College Athletes Should Be Paid.",” offers differing views on why student athletes should and or shouldn’t be paid. Horace States that College Athletes are not proficient competitors who are paid pay rates and motivating forces for a profession in games. They are students getting access to a school instruction through their cooperation in games, for which they procure grants to pay educational cost, charges, food and lodging, and other permissible costs. University games are not a vocation or calling. It is the understudies' vehicle to an advanced education degree.
The NCAA says that they don’t want to pay college athletes because of their scholarships. As the money keeps flowing more and more each and every year, it comes with more arguments about the athletes getting the money that they deserve. Sounds as if college athletes are blindly signing a sheet of paper and the NCAA has an evil smirk saying “You have no idea what you’ve gotten yourself into”. A court case had also gone down about a young college athlete and a car dealership. The dealership was using the athletes to make more sales with his cars and was doing behind the athletes back without
For example, if it wasn’t for basketball players, Gonzaga University would need to spend a lot more money on building a name recognition to students not located on the West. Everyone has their own opinion, but mine is that college athletes should be paid. The amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school are only three of a myriad of reasons why they should be paid. These athletes are not only students, but employees to their universities. They are a core member of many university’s marketing team.
Are they students or employees? They spend more time with the sport than in school. Student athletes should be acknowledged for their performances. College athletes should be paid to play because they bring money into the school, advertisement, and they perform the same tasks of pros. College kids bring in thousands of dollars every game day.
Should college athletes be paid? I think they should. I found three main reason why other people and myself think that college athletes deserve pay. One, you can just pay the sports that produce the most revenue. Two, these student athletes put in lots of work and even sometimes have to miss class to go to the sports event.
What college athletes don’t understand is that they are getting exposure to getting a professional contract. If that doesn’t work they will always have a college education to lean back on. They give generous scholarships to top student athletes receive, covering their tuition and most
When student-athletes received full scholarships, they should be privileged and thankful since the cost of higher education is very expensive. Student-athletes need to understand the circumstances and take of advantage of getting their degree from a well renowned university since the percentages are very slim to none on having a professional career in sports. The purpose of a student-athlete is to be a student first and then an athlete second. The main focus should be on earning a degree, and not worrying about when is the next game on the schedule. Many people are stating that college athletes should get paid, but how about the general student body that has little to nothing and working a job earning minimal pay.