The analysis of ‘The necklace’ ‘The Necklace’ is one of the most successful works of Maupassant. In this new, that amounts to a story, Maupassant pleasantly plays with words to leave some suspense. Throughout the news, no indication is no indication that outcome. The new resembles a well-known tale "Cinderella". In this analytical paper, I will examine this story. For a linear and complete analysis of ‘The Necklace’, it is possible to cut the new by following the thread of the story. • The meeting with the main characters and their living standards: The first part of the news gives us a glimpse into the lives of the characters and their personalities. Matilde Loisel lives modestly with her husband. In the description of the accommodation, one …show more content…
At the announcement, the reader realizes that Matilda is a capricious woman who does not accept his modest life. Invited to a big event, it cannot get there without prestigious jewel and without clothes (see: she wants to shine like a jewel). She does not hesitate to make indirect rebuke to her husband and reproached him for his "poverty." After a heated dialogue with her husband, it is keen to see her smile and yields to his whims. The reader understands that the husband of Mathilde is a generous man, desperate to fill his wife 's happiness. Her friend, Mr. Forestier, lend him a sumptuous necklace to ornament his clothes from the golden age. • The day of the ball: When the long-awaited day arrived, the player embarks on reading a list of short sentences. This enumeration is used to highlight the feelings of Matilda. She is happy, happy to be in a prestigious world. She waited so long this time it forgets his humble life that the reader feels a certain emotion at Mathilde. She is in her element and loves to please. She devours every minute and every second of this …show more content…
To make a quick return to reality, the author is playing with words. It says "the street of martyrs," "they had no car," "it 's cold". The euphoria of Matilda is no more. M and Mr. Loisel are frustrated on the loss and seek a solution to the problem. The loss of the necklace is charged for the player as a diabolical sentence. In trying too hard to live beyond its means, we reap what we sow. The reader also understands that Matilda will not announce this loss to her friend me Forestier. She prefers to hide the truth. • A life of misery: The loss of the necklace will cause serious consequences on the future of the couple. To fix this error, the couple will join forces to buy an identical necklace. They 'll work twice for ten years. Mathilde goes to no longer take care of him. The author uses harsh words like "poverty," "torture" and "deprivation". The author insists that the couple is welded. The couple lives in debt and sociable in deplorable conditions. The reader understands that it is better to settle for what we have, rather than envy others. • The
Even in adulthood, Mabel still carried the insecurity she had as a child due to her being of a lower class. She was denied acceptance into being of higher status and thus, of higher importance. Mabel’s treatment and experiences as a child cautioned her to stay in the shadows as an adult. When she removed her cloak and revealed her dress, she realized how striking it actually was and became unsettled. As the night progressed, Mabel’s instability became more evident as seen in the text, “Neither can she accept a compliment.
However, she is poor so she borrows a necklace from a friend. She did this instead of wearing flowers for a cheap 15 francs. Mathilde lost the necklace and had to pay it off over the next 10 years. She did this because she wanted to fit in and no one else would be wearing cheap flowers. The theme is also shown in this story by the fact the Mathilde wanted to wear jewelry.
She married an ordinary man despite her beauty because she lacked a dowry. Mathilde got the opportunity to go to an evening reception and borrowed a diamond necklace from a rich friend, Mme. Forestier. However, she lost the necklace. She
Title? Belonging is the pivotal axis around which human life revolves. Genuine poetry reflects directly or indirectly an awareness of the social problems of a country. Belonging and poetry, Miss Lawlor and my fellow students is one of the most curious combinations and this is what we see in the genre of poetry produced by the Australian poets in the 1960’s when……... Bruce Dawe was a vernacular poet known for his extraordinary empathy with people which characterises his poetry and gives a voice to the ordinary Australians.
In the novel, Great Gatsby, the two main women presented are Daisy Buchanan and Myrtle Wilson. There are many similarities and differences between Daisy and Myrtle. For instance both of them are unhappy in their lives and they are love in with a different with person, not with their husband. Their marriage is a jail. They are both in love with Tom in a different way, Daisy is the wife and Myrtle is the mistress.
Billy Collin’s juxtaposition of the lanyard, a seemingly pointless gift, to the gift of life given by his mother portrays the complexity of
It revolves around the flight of the princess to escape the awful marriage to his father (Perrault, 1977). Charles Perrault uses the princess’ character to reveal the major themes of overcoming evil, child abuse and incest in the story. Perrault also brings out the moral that it is better to encounter awful challenges in life than to fail in one’s duty. He shows that although the virtue may seem unrealistic, it can always triumph. The author uses various literary devices to reveal the various morals of the story.
“The Bloody Chamber” is Angela Carter`s retelling of the classic grim fairy tale “Bluebeard”. The passage analyzed in this essay is used in the story to identify the strange dynamic between the Marquis and his soon-to-be bride. In it the young heroine recounts the Marquis`s visage, his past wives and their wedding night. In order to establish the heroine and the Marquis`s abnormal relationship, Carter uses key literary devise such as theme to establish the idea of the Marquis`s dominance over the heroine, imagery to show an owner versus object exchange and foreshadowing to allude to the tale`s bloody end. Theme is used to portray the Marquis`s complete control over the heroine akin to an adult child dynamic.
M. Lantin turned to his late wife’s jewelry collection; he knew that it was fake jewelry but he was desperate and was in need of money. He took the jewelry to a jewelry store expecting to receive only a few francs but then he was told he was receiving thousands of francs. M. Lantin was in shock and could not believe that the entire time it was real jewelry and not fake; he became a very wealthy man and resigned from his job, eventually marrying another woman who made his wife miserable. M. Lantin’s first wife had a big impact on his life; however, his selfish actions lead to what he deserved ending up with a wife that made him miserable. M. Lantin’s first wife was a young beautiful woman who he fell deeply in love with, she was the ideal woman that any of the men would want in their life.
In the second paragraph of the story the author states that she is suffering because she doesn't have the things she wants by saying, “She suffered endlessly, feeling herself born for every delicacy and luxury. She suffered from the poorness of her house, from its mean walls, worn chairs, and ugly curtains.” (Guy de Maupassant 2) “She had no clothes, no jewels, nothing. And these were the only things she loved;” (Guy de Maupassant 2) The author included this to let the readers know what kind of “Poverty” Matilde was living in. Mathilde doesn't seem to love her husband as much.
The narrator illustrates Mathilde’s quality of selfishness after her husband asks her how much money she would like for a dress by remarking, “She thought over it… going over her allowance... thinking also of the amount she could ask for without bringing immediate refusal” (222). This portrays Mathilde's greed because she knows she is asking for more money than she needs for a suitable dress. Later, readers discover Mathilde is careless. When she first finds out the necklace is missing, she and her husband have a conversation. Monsieur Loisel asks, “Are you sure you had it when leaving the dance…if you had lost it on the street, we'd have heard it drop.
He also demonstrates through his characters a human touch. The characters that are victimized are viewed with understanding and sympathy. The story of ‘The Necklace’ is about a lady called Mrs. Loisel who was born into a family with very normal social status. She settled for a life of mediocracy by marrying a minor clerk in the ministry of education.
Loisel lives a decent life but constantly wants more, her greed and desire to be rich and wealthy is what ultimately brings the downfall of her character. On the night of the reception, Madame Loisel wears a magnificent diamond necklace from Madame Forestier. As Madame Loisel spends her time at the ball, she is able to live the life she believes she is entitled for. The happiest night of her life slowly becomes her worst nightmare. As she loses the necklace, and is unable to admit her mistake due to her excessive pride.
With her greed for attention, she asks one of her upper-class friends, Madame Forestier, for a necklace that she could borrow for the ball.
Literary theories are some ideas which try to define what literature is and how it needs to be studied. These focus on the nature of literature and present some methods to analyze those. These theories are like different lenses that views literature privileging particular aspects of a work over other characteristics. There are different schools of theory based on certain thoughts and assumptions they consider important. I am going to analyze ‘The Necklace’ from two different point of view- one is Marxist and the other is Feminist.