ipl-logo

Analyze The Arguments In Favour Of The Three Fifths

613 Words3 Pages

The three-fifths compromise was a system to determine state representation in Congress by counting each enslaved person as three-fifths of a person. Proposed in 1787 by James Wilson and Roger Sherman, it clearly showed the strength of the proslavery forces during the time of the United States Constitutional Convention. Since the Virginia Plan was rejected, the three-fifths compromise was enacted as a new framework for the government. The Southern states demanded more representation politically because their population was vastly increased due to slavery. The Northerners viewed one free man as one vote and one slave not counting as part of the population while the Southerners viewed one free man as one vote as well as one slave as one vote. As a result, an agreement was reached between the states of lower and higher slave population.
During the proposition of the …show more content…

The Constitution and the Dred Scott case each viewed the three-fifths compromise from a different perspective in which one opposed and the other supported it. The Constitution declared for the distribution of political power among the states while the Dred Scott decision fought against it wanting slaves to be free. Both sources gave me a better understanding of the issue that is being debated and why it is so historically important. I agree with the Dred Scott case in terms of it fighting for freedom. There is a current issue being dealt with today similar to the political issue of the three-fifths compromise making it difficult to expand states. “California’s population is seventy times larger than Wyoming’s, but they have the same number of votes in the Senate.” This shows that representation issues are still being dealt with and are still of importance to this

Show More
Related

  • Unit 2 American War Essay Questions And Answers

    1419 Words  | 6 Pages

    The New Jersey Plan was in favor of small states and wanted a unicameral legislature and all states to have equal representation. The Connecticut Compromise, also known as The Great Compromise, or Sherman’s Compromise, was reach during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787,it was an agreement between two earlier proposals which solved the issue it called for a bicameral legislature with the upper chamber, called the Senate, determined by equal representation, and the lower chamber, called the House of Representatives, determined by the population of each state; it combined both interests. The Great Compromise was proposed to address the feelings from the smaller states that their interest would be drawn out by the larger states. However, the Three Fifths Compromise proposed by Judge James Wilson, and Roger Sherman. The Three Fifths Compromise is three out of every five slaves would be counted for taxes and population.

    Read More

  • The Three-Fifth Compromises Of The Northern And Southern States

    926 Words  | 4 Pages

    The two delegates that proposed this compromise were James Wilson of Pennsylvania and Roger Sherman of Connecticut. The “northern states agree with this compromise if the southern states would agree to apply this proportion to taxes as well” (Jillson, 43). The Southern states wanted the representation assigned by population, after the Virginia Plan was rejected, the three-fifths compromise seemed to guarantee that the South would be strongly represented in the House of Representatives and would have a disproportionate power in electing

    Read More

  • Gerrymandering Issue Essay

    756 Words  | 4 Pages

    This ruling paved way for another landmark case, Reynolds v. Sims (1964), which was a court ruling in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the election of any chamber of a state legislature the electoral districts must be roughly equal in population. This was a landmark case in that “one-person, one-vote” is protected by the Equal Protection Clause, as part of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This “one-person, one-vote” rule says that legislative voting districts must be the same in population size so that one person’s voting power ought to be roughly equivalent to another person’s within the state. This rule is a key foundation to measuring the constitutionality for the gerrymandering of state legislative

    Read More

  • What Is The Compromise Of 1877 Dbq

    364 Words  | 2 Pages

    The compromise was a backhanded deal that decided the controversial election of 1876 between Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden. This lead to a power vacuum that lead to the KKK and old confederate leaders being able to

    Read More

  • Why The Compromise Of 1850 Failed

    175 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of The Three Fifths Clause

    162 Words  | 1 Pages

    The three-fifths clause was the most important constitutional compromise because it granted the Southern states more political authority, which the Southerners then used to maintain slavery as an institution in the upcoming decades. The three-fifths clause made it so that three-fifths of a state’s slave population would be used in order to decide how many electoral votes and how many representatives a state could have. It was a compromise between the South (which relied on slaves for its economy) and the North (which had fewer slaves) for the sake of political unity. This clause guaranteed Southern states more political power than Northern States through votes or representation, so that laws would pass that allowed slavery to continue and flourish.

    Read More

  • How Did The Articles Of Confederation Influence The Constitution

    1018 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Northern states, smaller in comparison to the south, already did not have as much representation and political power as the southern states. Therefore, the compromise to them was unnecessary, and they felt they would have all the power and dominate in the polls and decisions. Considering the different views the two already had based on slavery, this alarmed the northern states. However, as time passed, the Three-Fifths Compromise would not provide the advantage the slave owning south had hoped. The Northern states grew more rapidly in terms of population and ended up being opposing political power to others.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Great Compromise

    298 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Great Compromise which was founded at the Constitutional Convention wasn't formed without trouble. Many of the delegates that participated in the convention were wealthy landowners and lawyers, who owned many slaves. They failed to notice the diversity that excited within the nation. As they talked how to repair the Articles of Confederation, issues would arise that would create continuous debates amongst each other. One of the issues that would arise would be the nature of the new government.

    Read More

  • Why Was Slavery Not Constitutional

    978 Words  | 4 Pages

    One of the first stumbling blocks was how small states would be represented. The Compromise worked out was for the House of Representatives to be based upon population and the Senate to be equal among the states. This was very important because it would both affect the number of electoral votes and taxes paid to the federal government. With so many slaves in the South, the issue was, “should slaves be counted?” It was agreed upon that that slaves would be counted as three-fifths a person for both representation and taxation and clarifies adding whole numbers of free persons and three-fifths of all other persons.

    Read More

  • The Dred Scott Decision And Bleeding Kansas

    756 Words  | 4 Pages

    The decision was finally reached in 1857, this lead the states to decide the issue of slavery with majority rule, although slaves were not counted as citizens. (Events and Decision Leading to Civil War,

    Read More

  • Dbq Slavery

    438 Words  | 2 Pages

    One issue they faced concerned how they would count slaves for legislative purposes. The free North states thought slaves shouldn’t be counted at all because it would give the slave states an unfair representation due to the high slave population. However, the South disagreed for they feared the Northern states would have a substantial population advantage if the slaves were not counted. They worried that the Northern states would use such an advantage against them to regulate or even abolish slavery. To appease the slavery states they enacted the Three-Fifths Compromise.

    Read More

  • The Three Compromises Made In The Constitutional Convention

    1593 Words  | 7 Pages

    One of the compromises made in the Constitutional Convention is the three-fifths compromise. In this compromise, the southerners wanted to add slaves to the population of the state they lived in. If slaves were included in their state’s population, that state would be able to add more representatives in the House of Representatives. Northerners did not agree with that statement because slaves did not have the right to vote. After the delegates compromised, they agreed that only three-fifths of the slave’s population would be counted into the state’s population.

    Read More

  • What Caused The Civil War Dbq

    1122 Words  | 5 Pages

    These were a big deal involving slavery because they either strengthened slavery or made it seem like it was going to end all together. To the South, the thought of slavery ending was a complete disaster. In Document 9: Excerpt from the Dred Scott Decision, shows how Scott saw the Missouri Compromise. He says, “(I)t is the opinion of this court that the Act of Congress (the Missouri Compromise) which prohibited a citizen from holding and owning property of this kind (slaves) in the territory of the United States north of the line therein mentioned,...” This quote from his speech says he thinks that the Missouri Compromise was a good thing because it prohibited people who own slaves to cross the North and South border with their “property” or slaves.

    Read More

  • Missouri Compromise Essay

    1563 Words  | 7 Pages

    At the time, there was not a way to completely settle the issue, but there was a way to ease some of the dispute between the states. The Missouri compromise was made to alleviate some of the conflicts over slavery. Slavery all started in 1619 in America when African slaves were taken to Jamestown, Virginia (history.com 2017). Slavery was an acceptable practice throughout the country in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (history.com 2009). African American slaves were taken from their homes and brought to America to be put in other peoples homes and do work (gilderlehrman.org 2009).

    Read More

  • Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

    1121 Words  | 5 Pages

    The issue the compromise was about was whether there should be slavery in the western territories. Maine wanted to be added to the Union, however, slavery was banned there. If Maine were to be added to the Union, it would upset the balance between free and slave states in the nation and the Senate. So, the Missouri Compromise, proposed by Senator Henry Clay, allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state, and allowed Missouri to be entered into the Union as a slave state.

    Read More

More about Analyze The Arguments In Favour Of The Three Fifths

Open Document