Analyzing Socrates Arguments Of Euthyphro
Midterm Short Essay (Question 2) Socrates objects to Euthyphro’s definition of piety because according to the two premises agreed by Euthyphro, pious is not equal to the god-loved. In the dialogue when Socrates wants to explain the reason the Euthyphro, Socrates says, “So it is in the same case as the things just mentioned; it is not being loved by those who love it because it is something loved, but it is something loved because it is being loved by them?” (10d). Here Socrates presents his first premise for his argument: Something is loved by God, because it is God loved. Then Socrates asks Euthyphro, “It is being loved because it is pious, or for some other reasons? —For no other reasons” (10d). In this sentence we get another premise of the argument: Pious is being loved because it is pious and there will be no other reasons. …show more content…
The first premise is that something is loved by God because it is God loved. The second premise is that pious is God loved because it is pious. We can simply change the premises into another easily understand form by marking “loved by God” as “A”, “God loved as B” and “pious” as “C”. Therefore, the first premise now is that something is “A” because it is “B”. The second premise now is that something is “B” because it is “C”. With these two premises, the conclusion we can get is that “A” is not equal to “C”.Then we plug the terms back into their original, and we will get the conclusion that pious is not equal to loved by
Socrates And Euthyphro Argument
1310 Words | 6 PagesHe does as such for a few reasons. In any case, he doesn't trust that one's obligation toward a perfect being ought to be viewed as something that is partitioned and particular from his obligation toward his kindred men. In actuality, he holds that the main genuine method for rendering administration to God comprises in doing what one can to advance the good and otherworldly improvement of people. Second, Socrates respects the reason and capacity of religion as something that is unique in relation to the view communicated by Euthyphro. Rather than religion being utilized as a sort of hardware or gadget for getting what one needs, as was valid for Euthyphro's situation, Socrates trusts the basic role of genuine religion is to carry one's own life into amicability with the will of God.
Stereotypes Of Socrates Arguments In His Defense
557 Words | 3 PagesAnother charge for Socrates is "Something of this sort: - That Socrates is a doer of evil, and corrupter of the youth, and he does not believe in the gods of the state and has other new divinities of his own. That is the sort of charge, and now let us examine the particular counts." Socrates refuted from the words of Maretus. He reminded Maretus of the fact that the so-called unbelieving accusations were only applicable to Anaxacola, and that it was absurd to say that a man who believed in a tragic god did not believe in God.
Analysis Of Euthyphro And Socrates
484 Words | 2 PagesSocrates dissatisfied with this definition begins to push Euthyphro to think on his argument of pious and impious rather than an example. Taken back from what Socrates has just told him that he attempts to define pious but instead proposes the possibilities of pious, not a definition. Socrates explained to Euthyphro that the correct definition would help him argue against Meletus’ charges of impiety. He attempts to answer Socrates’ question once more by stating that pious is a form of
Euthyphro And Meno: The Universal Definition Of Piety
1811 Words | 8 PagesSocrates then tries to learn the essence of piety from Euthyphro by questioning him over several definitions of what it may by using the process of elimination. Euthyphro’s first definition of piety was prosecuting the wrong. However, Socrates points out that examples of pity are not definitions can cannot define piety itself.
Socrates And Euthyphro's Argument Analysis
893 Words | 4 PagesThe discourse between Socrates and Euthyphro clearly depicts a dilemma when it comes to the question on holiness, moral goodness and the will of God. While Euthyphro is of the opinion that what is dear to the gods is holy, and what is not dear to them is unholy, (Indiana University 6) Socrates seems to be of a different opinion. This discourse occurs at a time when there is a belief in many gods in Greece, each god having different duties. The gods are also known to disagree on a number of issues. Socrates, in trying to counter Euthyphro’s idea he opines that since the gods disagree, they must have different concepts of what is ethical and what is not.
Evaluating Socrates Claim In The Apology
835 Words | 4 PagesEuthyphro tries to explain him that he was doing the same as Zeus did to his father and therefore being pious. But Socrates argues that it is just an example and not an explanation. He tries again and says what gods like is pious and what they dislike is not. But Socrates points out the fallacy in that argument that one god might not agree with another to which he replies in his third attempt what all gods like is pious and what they all hate is impious. Here, in this example we can see that how he searches for a concrete and complete definition for being pious.
Edmund Gettier's Article: Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?
1261 Words | 6 PagesSecond, he proposes that for any p, if s is justified in believing p and s deduces some q
Is Euthyphro Pious In Prosecuting His Father
715 Words | 3 PagesThe second, Socrates asks Euthyphro, have you known what a piety is if your attitude is confident that you indict your father for a crime. (Plato (1997), p.77.). Socrates tries to look for one standard definition of piety. Let, have a look at what piety means to Euthyphro. He comes up with the several suggestions about piety: “to prosecute a wrongdoer is pious and not to prosecute is impious”; “what all the gods hate is impious, and what they all love is pious”; “where there is piety there is also justice” (Plato (1997), p.88.).
Socrates And Nietzsche's Expression Of The Lion In Every Man
1119 Words | 5 PagesAnother thing Socrates is famous for is his twisting of nature in a paradoxical way to serve his own desire to persuade: to Socrates, virtue, wisdom, and eudaemonia are directly linked, a recurring idea in many of his dialogues. His definition of happiness and morality is far different from anyone else’s, especially from Callicles’ and Nietzsche who believes that the law of nature takes over (also perceived this way by Nietzsche). E.R. Dodds mentions the idea that Nietzsche finds a reflexion of himself in Callicles, ascetic Socrates’ most interesting interlocutor in the “Gorgias”. Interesting in the fact that Callicles appears to be a purely hedonistic personage, whose definition of a good life is one where all pleasures of the body are maximised,
Ontological Argument And Rowe's Analysis
1686 Words | 7 PagesIf God does not exist in reality, he must only exist in the understanding. The fifth premise is that God might have been greater than he is. This premise follows through premise two, three, and four. If God only exists only in the understanding, but might have existed in reality, and if so might have been greater than it is, than God might have been greater than he is. The sixth premise is that God is a being in which a greater is possible.
How Did Socrates Corrupt The Youth
1535 Words | 7 PagesSocrates’s official new charge “asserts that Socrates does injustice by corrupting the young, and by not believing in the gods in whom the city believes, but in other daimonia that are novel” (24b, p. 73). By looking deeper into the dialogue of The Apology and Euthyphro, one can see how passionately Socrates strives to express to the Athenian people his innocence in teaching the youth and worshiping of the gods. Socrates maintains his innocence in teaching the youth for three reasons. Primarily, there is no proof or evidence from past examples in which Socrates has taught the youth because no one has come out and said so. Socrates brings up a valid point that his so-called ‘teachings’ haven’t changed over time and therefore if he is accused
Socrates: A Threat To The Athenian Society
912 Words | 4 PagesSocrates started his life as an average Athen citizen. His parents worked, making an honest living. But as Socrates grew up, he began to realize that his mind questioned things and wondered how come no one else questioned the same things or at least think about the answers to the questions that were not answered. So, as his mind kept wandering, he began to acknowledge the questions that were not answered and sought for those answers. He ended up believing and teaching things to other people, whether it went against the way the Athen government or not, he still continued his work.
Euthyphro's Dilemma Vs Divine Command Theory
123 Words | 1 PagesEuthyphro’s Dilemma is when Socrates asks Euthyphro, “Does God love goodness because it is good, or is it good because God loves it?” Euthyphro’s Dilemma is that God determines what is good and evil, right and wrong. This dilemma challenges the Divine Command theory because according to Euthyphro’s Dilemma we would be obligated to do something wrong because God commanded it. This conflicts with the Divine Command theory because it would imply that cruelty could be morally right if God told us to do so. The idea that cruelty can be morally right goes up against the belief in the Divine Command Theory because it proposes that an action's status that is morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by God
Reputation In Plato's The Defense Of Socrates
1452 Words | 6 PagesHis main argument—his premises—is not diluted by this jump in reasoning. When one finishes this work they are not really contemplating taking his advice to wholly ignore reputation and superficiality, but rather one is reminded to try to pursue nobler aspects of life: truth, wisdom, and self-knowledge. The overall significance of my critique is that a literal interpretation of The Defense of Socrates can be dangerous as it promotes disregard for fellow humans. It can be used as an excuse for scholars to hermit themselves away, never abide by societal norms when interacting with others, and, due to a terrible reputation, never effectively share their ideas with the rest of society.
Morality In The Euthyphro, By Plato
951 Words | 4 PagesHe is certain that prosecuting his father is the just and moral course of action because he believed it was commanded as such by the divine who are supposedly innately good. Unable to see the soundness in Euthyphro’s claim, Socrates proposes a question that has become known as possibly one of the oldest ethical questions in the history of philosophy. Socrates proposes the following question to Euthyphro, “Is what is holy (or moral) approved by the gods because it is holy, or is it holy because it is approved by the
More about Analyzing Socrates Arguments Of Euthyphro
Socrates And Euthyphro Argument
1310 Words | 6 PagesStereotypes Of Socrates Arguments In His Defense
557 Words | 3 PagesAnalysis Of Euthyphro And Socrates
484 Words | 2 PagesEuthyphro And Meno: The Universal Definition Of Piety
1811 Words | 8 PagesSocrates And Euthyphro's Argument Analysis
893 Words | 4 PagesEvaluating Socrates Claim In The Apology
835 Words | 4 PagesEdmund Gettier's Article: Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?
1261 Words | 6 PagesIs Euthyphro Pious In Prosecuting His Father
715 Words | 3 PagesSocrates And Nietzsche's Expression Of The Lion In Every Man
1119 Words | 5 PagesOntological Argument And Rowe's Analysis
1686 Words | 7 PagesHow Did Socrates Corrupt The Youth
1535 Words | 7 PagesSocrates: A Threat To The Athenian Society
912 Words | 4 PagesEuthyphro's Dilemma Vs Divine Command Theory
123 Words | 1 PagesReputation In Plato's The Defense Of Socrates
1452 Words | 6 PagesMorality In The Euthyphro, By Plato
951 Words | 4 Pages