Andrea Campbell Forensic Evidence Essay

There is powerful verification that fingerprints aren’t foolproof. In “ Forensic Science: Evidence, Clues, and Investigation” by Andrea Campbell, she gives a strong explanation of how forensic science plays a vital role in solving criminal cases. Campbell has shown that forensic evidence is unquestionably the most dominant type of evidence to present at a trial.

In the same way, “...unless the criminals take something away from the crime scene, hard evidence does not leave. Unlike crime scene bystanders, hard evidence will not get confused or become frightened. And unlike criminals, it will not make up stories or lie.” This valuable piece of evidence contributes to the idea that forensic evidence will consistently be accurate and hard to be manifested invalid. Andrea Campbell’s example declares that unless the criminals took something away from the scene to attempt to give the impression of them free from evil

As it says in paragraph nine, “Yet hard evidence is only as reliable as the people who collect, analyze , and interrupt it. At trial, different experts sometimes draw different conclusions from the same evidence. And defense attorneys attack the validity of forensic evidence by pointing to lapses in the way the evidence was collected or handled.” Campbell’s example shows that it could possibly be shown that forensic evidence is not the most dominant type of evidence to be presented at court. Then again, Andrea does also state that “ Thus it is essential that law enforcement officers, forensic scientists , and prosecutors understand and meticulously follow proper evidence-handling procedures.” This exclaims that without these firm and vital procedures the guilty may go free, or the innocent may be wrongly convicted. People who believe that forensic science is irrelevant and untrustworthy are out of their