In our society killing one’s own child would be looked at as a horrific act. The bond between a mother and child should be unbreakable. What could possibly motivate someone to do something so terrible to his or her child? In the case of Andrea Yates there were multiple factors, including her mental health, which ultimately caused her to take the lives of her children. Infanticide, which is killing one’s own child, has not always been regarded as an act of horror, even in the U.S. There are numerous factors that can play into infanticide in the United States but in China it is mostly related to the heavy population and the culture. The United States has been progressive in trying to stop infanticide, whereas in China it is widely accepted and practiced. To better understand we need to know what infanticide is, and how it can be viewed worldwide. …show more content…
She killed her five children, ages ranging from seven years old to six months old by drowning them in the bathtub. Her family history of mental illness as well as her upbringing contributed to the incident. She was raised as a Roman Catholic and part of the reason why she killed her children was because “…she had been marked by Satan and the only way to save her children from hell was to kill them.” Her family’s religious views brought in the idea that parents are responsible for their children’s afterlife path, if they went to heaven or hell. (McLellan) Her mental state was fragile even before the birth of her youngest child, and it continued to worsen after. She was admitted several times to mental institutes for suicide attempts or catatonic episodes, where she was prescribed antipsychotics and sent home. She stated she had been thinking about killing her children for about two years prior to committing the murders. (McLellan) Her mental state paired with her religious upbringing was contributing factors to her children’s
She did kill her husband so she has to be punished. That makes sense. At the same time, I think she could have a mitigating factor because she had battered women syndrome. What she had done was wrong, but, as she says, I can see that she could not deal with her husband anymore. It is difficult for me to decide whether she goes to a mental facility or prison.
Aileen blamed herself for that death and found herself having many run-ins with the police. At eighteen, Aileen was arrested in Colorado, for a DUI, disorderly conduct and firing a .22-caliber pistol from a moving vehicle (?). In 1976, shortly after her marriage fell apart, she was arrested in Michigan for assault and disturbing the peace after she had thrown a cue ball at a bartender’s head (?). At twenty-six she was arrested in Florida for armed robbery, after robbing a convenience store for thirty-five dollars and two packs of cigarettes (?). She was sentenced to three years in prison and was released in 1983 (?).
Nobody believe her that she was the killer. Most of the court room judge was all male. So, they didn’t believe that a woman could be able to kill her own family. She was guilty and wasn’t put in jail without any prove that she killed them.
She may have had her emotions completely take over and her mind may have been telling her body what to do. Being emotionally unstable, makes our brains “foggy” and can often blind us from the real world and concepts of right and wrong. She was obviously not psychologically stable in her life during that
While she was able to garner a bit of sympathy due to her history of mental illness, the sheer brutality of her heinous crime could not be ignored. Even with her post-partum psychosis being evident, the fact that a mother was able to carry out the murder of her five young children was unable to be ignored by the media and public. Yates’s confession and belief that she had done the right thing for her children only proved to be the final nails in the coffin. Given the case, it was impossible for the media to support Yates over her children who were simply innocent victims of
Doing this, in her mind, was the only way she could protect her children. In her first trial, she was found guilty and was sentenced to life in prison. She found herself being allowed to have a second trial, and after deliberating her mental state at the time of the crime, the court had found her “not guilty by reason of insanity.” She would find herself being committed to a psychiatric facility to be treated, rather than being sent to jail for life. This is where the guilty of insanity plea gets tricky.
Let me explain- she was insane Andrea Yates was a mother of five children ranging from six months old to seven years old. One day, after a normal morning, Andrea’s husband left for work and Andrea drew a bath and drowned her five children in the bathtub. The reason for this?
“Your time to shine has arrived Jones.” “I appreciate it so much Chief, I promise you there is no way in which I can let you down.” “We already discuss it with the board, we trust you Jones. We analyzed your whole record history, starting four years ago when you were first recruited to this Secrete Teen Agent Institution. You are now one of our top agents, and definitely the perfect match for this important mission.
The article says that in court the woman admitted that she had been planning to kill her children for two weeks, but she also planned to kill her husband along with them, but
I think this case went beyond the cultural aspect. Also, the child, regardless of their culture, the child is protected by law since they’re in the US and they have the rights to live. In this situation we don’t have much evidence as if the child also practice this cultural behavior, but even if they do, they certainly didn’t die out of their own will. I believed that if the death was not commit out of one’s willingness then that is consider a murder. Additionally, the Declaration of Human Rights, even though it’s an American culture and value, some of the ideas in the Human Rights Constitution are general philosophy that applied to many circumstances, including the child that the mother killed, so the two mothers should be sentenced under
She stated that she was sorry, and felt as though she was taken by satan. She said, "I desire to be humbled before God for that sad and humbling providence that befell my father's family in the year about ninety-two; that I, then being in my childhood, should, by such a providence of God, be made an instrument for the accusing of several people for grievous crimes, whereby their lives was taken away from them, whom, now I have just grounds and good reason to believe they were innocent persons; and that it was a great delusion of
There is so much more to the issue than her instability the day she killed all her children. There were a series of factors which played into what may be considered her mental breaking
Looking back at it I should have seen the signs, the first day of kindergarten she bit a kid because she thought he was looking at her weird for christ sake. Constant calls from the elementary principal, basically once a week, until the accident. After that she stopped. She never did anything. It was like, when she killed him, she killed herself.
The baby even if in the very early stages of lifetime, has a right to life, a purpose and a future, and should not be punished. Each of us was a zygote and then grew up in to a person. This person is a unique one, a part of the society, living his life and has future plans and of course glad that he was felt worth and given a chance to be
She is putting her children in danger. Her life appears to be a mistake. She is the enemy to propriety. Now death looks healthier than heartache,