“Meet You In Hell: Andrew Carnegie, Henry Clay Frick, and the Bitter Partnership That Transformed America” written by, Les Standiford, an author and historian, with a B.A in Psychology from Muskingum College and Ph.D. degree in Literature from the University of Utah. Comes forth telling the enthralling story of Andrew Carnegie, Henry Clay Frick, and the bloody Homestead strike of 1892 that transformed their famous partnership into an enraged rivalry. The author’s main thesis is that the Homestead Steal Strike prompted the bloodiest conflict between management and work in United States history which led to the beginning of the end of the Carnegie - Frick partnership.
To begin, Standiford introduces us to the two main protagonists of his book,
…show more content…
He later moved to the United States at a young age of 13, where he worked a multiple of railroad jobs. Through this experience, Carnegie learned the fundamentals of the business world and the railroad industry, in which he came to leave in 1865. By the following decade, the vast majority of Carnegie's time was committed to the steel industry, in which he later used to emerge his own steel company. His business got to be known as the Carnegie Steel Company, revolutionized steel production in the United States. Carnegie fabricated plants around the nation, utilizing innovations and methods that made manufacturing steel easier, quicker and more profitable. Henry Clay Frick was born on December 19, 1849, in West Overton, Pennsylvania. Frick worked as a salesman in one of Pittsburgh's most distinctive stores where he retained proficiency in accounting. Frick started constructing and operating coke ovens in 1870, creating Frick and Company. Success came quick as “by the end of 1873, Frick and Company …owned two hundred coke ovens, selling …show more content…
Standiford uses the primary source, Illustrated Weekly, a widely held New York publication to characterize Frick as “forceful, self-reliant, and showed determination to carry his point at all hazards” (Standiford, 2005, p. 77). This illustrates Frick’s eagerness as a giant in the coke industry. Another example of Standiford use of sources is in, Giants of Enterprise by Richard S. Tedlow in this work it mentions Carnegies accomplishments due to his “talent, genius idiosyncrasy, and idiocy” (Standiford, 2005, p. 66). These sources help us understand how both men’s differences became their downfall. Nevertheless, Standiford’s use of sources prove his claims involving Frick and Carnegie. The Robber Barons, a novel written by Matthew Josephson, supports Standiford’s claim that Frick and Carnegie were giant American industrialists who held economic power, however, in The Myth of the Robber Barons: A New Look at the Rise of Big Business in America written by Burton W. Folsom expresses that majority of Robber Barons were actually political entrepreneurs, not economic
Carnegie and Frick’s basic economic principals were not driven by marketing or sales quota, but cost
Standiford mentions in the book that the management of all these disparate business entities was becoming “unwidely”. Carnegie at least publicly claimed to support all working men and their right to organize, but Frick did not want to apologize for what he had done. When Homestead Strike fully exploded in gunfire and violent war, Carnegie gave Frick full support for whatever means he adopted to suppress the strikers and keep the company sound. Only after it was all over and the dead had been counted did Carnegie express some mild criticism of Frick's tactics. In coke industry, according to the “Meet You In Hell”, McLuckie, a $2.25-a-day employee in the Homestead converter department, said: ”The cause of the wage trouble is not generally understood.
The two sources provided presented two different points of view regarding the Homestead Strike of 1892. The first reading is an article from the Pittsburgh Post. Since it is meant to be a record, there is no bias. Frick tries to be logical as he tries to justify his actions during the Homestead strike. He explains the different points between the Carnegie company and the men, such as the sliding scale system.
He went to Henry Bessemer, a German scientist, who had invented a way of introducing iron to carbon more efficiently. Carnegie could produce a steel railroad tie in 15 minutes, rather than the average 2 weeks. Taking this invention back to the United States, Carnegie built a bridge spanning the Mississippi River and thus creating structural steel. After having a very successful life with Carnegie Steel, he then sold his company to JP Morgan for $480 million.
Carnegie set a model for a big and successful corporation and industry as an initial adopter of new technologies. After exploring in Europe and seeing the Bessemer blast furnace, Carnegie founded the American practice of the technology at his Braddock, Pennsylvania steel works in the 1870s. Carnegie was the first to implement the steelmaking process in the United States. The resulting increase in quality and lower prices made his product highly demanded. J.P. Morgan rose to power by dramatic financial battles.
Andrew Carnegie, a Scottish immigrant, owned a steel mill in Pennsylvania. His business partner, a coke manufacturer named Henry Frick, both were against labor unions. Both tried to stop their workers having unions forever, and Frick told the employees that if they wanted to continue working there, they couldn’t be a part of a union. Frick prepared for a fight by hiring the Pinkertons to end any strikes. Once the workers saw them, however, they started to shoot.
The steel tycoon Andrew Carnegie started out from a humbling beginning as poor immigrate working his way up the corporate ladder (). Until the day came when Andrew Carnegie decided he would strike out on his own, and Carnegie Steel was born. Now, Carnegie new that his steel mills most valuable assets was the workers. Consequently, Carnegie encouraged the workers to participate in collective bargaining for wages (). As a result, the factory workers were able to bargain their way to a truly livable wage.
From the era of Reconstruction to the end of the 19th century, the United States underwent an economic transformation marked by the maturing of the industrial economy, the rapid expansion of big business, the development of large-scale agriculture, and the rise of national labor unions and industrial conflict. America was home to the three key factors of production: land, labor and money, which allowed America to industrialize very quickly. The rapid industrial growth was a curse for America because the idea of Social Darwinism impacted the way big business operators thought; this led to hazardous labor conditions which put workers at risk and the relationship between businesses and government created a corrupt bribing system. Big business owner’s priority was to make a profit, most did not care who they hurt to achieve this goal.
Was Andrew Carnegie a Hero During the late 19th century, Andrew Carnegie made an investment in the steel industry that profited into a fortune, but Carnegie’s earlier life didn’t include wealth. In fact, his family immigrated from Scotland to America in the mid 1800s in search for opportunities. After working tirelessly for many years, Andrew Carnegie became one of the most successful businessmen and philanthropists of all time. Although he accomplished many achievements in the Industry there are underlying reasons indicating that Carnegie was not a hero, such as, his wealth management, inconsiderate work conditions, and hypocrisy.
In this essay, I’ll be telling you my opinion on whether Andrew Carnegie was a hero or not. Andrew Carnegie, known as the king of steel, grew up poor, but became one of the richest and most successful business owner during the 1800s and 1900s. Much of the world regarded Carnegie as the most famous living American during his time. Andrew Carnegie was not a hero because he showed off his money, treated his workers poorly, and was selfish. First of all, Andrew Carnegie flashes his wealth.
At the end of the 19th Century, as the United States was experiencing rapid industrialization, a reconfiguration of the social order yielded opposing visions of social progress. Andrew Carnegie, wealthy businessman, and Jane Addams, founder of Chicago’s Hull House, put forward different methods to achieve such progress, where Addams focuses on creating social capital in a seemingly horizontal manner while Carnegie advocates for a top-down approach. While both of them seem to reap a sense of purpose from their attempts to improve the nation, their approaches vary depending on their vision of the composition of the population they want to uplift. First, Carnegie and Addams’ desire to improve society is partly self-serving. For Carnegie, improving society is the role of the wealthy man who, “animated by Christ’s spirit” (“Wealth”), can administer wealth for the community better than it could have for itself (“Wealth”).
Carnegie’s views on the treatment of his workers are one of the things that he did that are considered unethical. For instance, during America’s depression in the early 1800’s, Carnegie’s workers were repeatedly asked to work long hours for little play; many unions resisted, particularly in the Homestead Strike of 1892. In the Homestead Strike, workers were angry about pay cuts and Carnegie’s
The Homestead Strike In Homestead Pennsylvania, Andrew Carnegie, a Scottish man owned a steel plant. Carnegie had emigrated from Scotland as a young boy, and had had to work his way up the American work industry. He had a business partner named Henry Clay Frick who owned a coke manufacturing company. Carnegie and his friend had an individualistic opinion when it came to the matters of the workers union, and opposed any form of authority by anyone.
Andrew Carnegie Andrew Carnegie’s was one of the most successful businessmen during America’s Age of Industrialization in the 1880’s. After the Civil War, he saw a future in having a career in the iron industry, and later on, decided to invest in the steel industry (PBS). Though Carnegie is most known for his contribution in the steel industry, he took part in a few other businesses as well. However, the Gilded Age is an era full of poverty and corruption hidden underneath the prosperous, wealthy nation, and the working conditions within Carnegie Steel Company were not much better than those in other factories (Resetar).
His employees couldn’t even express distress without getting incarcerate. This amplify their discontent even further with Carnegie. Laborers did not agree with Carnegie and publicly disagree with