ipl-logo

Andrew Jackson Point Of View Analysis

494 Words2 Pages

There were two different points of view discussed in the documents. The first view from “Appeal of the Cherokee Nation” showed how the Cherokee was trying to show the congress their point of view about moving from their homeland to a place they do not know. They made valid points why they were not willing to move and their first reason was how they valued their current home because it was the land of their ancestors and they honored their dead in these lands. The Cherokee believed that leaving to the western territory would provoke the western tribes to violence towards the Cherokee members. Andrew Jackson had a different point of view and he was wanting the Cherokee land to use their resources and make more room for white citizens. From his point of view the offer of paying for the …show more content…

Boudinot believes that staying in the eastern territory will result in violence and he does not want his people to end up as servants and mistreated because they would not relocate. Some people believed the Indian removal policy was a great option because it was for the greater good of the new settlers coming to the United States. Having free Cherokee land would mean more resources for the settlers and they would have a healthier lifestyle and would be able to monetize the land to farmers and other agricultural practices. Our attitudes have changed a lot since the 1830’s because now we value the rights of every United States citizen and would not forcefully remove a race of people because they were wrongfully considered savages. Some of the ideals have stayed the same because the Indians do not own majority of the land like they did in the 1830’s but they are given many provisions such as free education, and many centers are built to honor and uphold the traditions of the Indian

Show More
Related

  • Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

    187 Words  | 1 Pages

    It is clear from the documents that Andrew Jackson acted like a king/tyrant. One reason that Andrew Jackson acted like a king was because he didn't listen to congress and he went against the U.S. Constitution. Document four stated that he sent soldiers to force Native Americans out of their homes at gunpoint and into stockades. After a few months of living in the stockades, the soldiers forced the Native Americans into the Indian territory called Oklahoma.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Presidency Dbq Essay

    1447 Words  | 6 Pages

    Essay Response #2 Emily Refici Suny American History Paventi Liverpool High School The figure of Andrew Jackson was controversial in the 1800s and continues to be divisive in contemporary society. As several academics praise Jackson for his fortitude and mass support, others fault him for his vengeful nature and abuse of his given authority.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

    447 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the 1820s, Americans began to get a large and growing say in politics. This was the time where many people could vote, and their votes actually mattered. Because of this, many common people would vote for Andrew Jackson. Many believed it was time for a rough, “self-made” man to be president of the United States. Jackson represented the common people and related to them, and he also solved the national debt issue along with providing more lands for Americans.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Case Analysis

    722 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our dear brother and sisters of the Cherokees, our nation’s action were only to create a more permanent home for you. The preamble of the New Echota Treaty states, “…with a view to reuniting their people in one body and securing a permanent home for themselves and their posterity in the country selected by their forefathers…and where they can establish and enjoy a government of their choice …and as may tend to their individual comfort and their advancement in civilization.” Andrew Jackson, our president, was providing a way for the Cherokee people to live and develop without either of our nations inferring, which could lead to conflict and possible wars. A luminary hero Mr. Jackson is, because he knew our fate if this Removal did not happen. A war in which millions could have died in and he saved our soldiers; the Cherokees

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Vs The Historians Analysis

    513 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the journal article “ Andrew Jackson versus the Historians”, author Charles G. Sellers explained the various interpretations of Jackson, from the viewpoint of Whig historians and Progressive Historians. These interpretations were based on the policies of Jackson. The Whig historians viewed the former president in a negative way. They considered him arrogant, ignorant, and not fit for being president. Sellers pointed out that it was not just because of “Jackson’s personality…nor was it the general policies he pursued as president”

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Research Paper

    778 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.

    Read More

  • Why Is The Indian Removal Act Enforced

    544 Words  | 3 Pages

    The president during the enforcement of the Indian removal act, Andrew Jackson, thought that the indigenous people were less civilized and moral than the settlers, although many of the tribes had adapted to the European lifestyle. He did not believe that the more “civilized” people should live alongside the indigenous people. When congress passed the Indian removal act in 1830 that stated that it was legal to force indigenous people off of their land, he fully enforced it, pushing tribes west. When there was an auction of Cherokee land, he claimed he couldn 't do anything to stop it, but he didn 't truly want to. The indigenous people wanted to coexist in peace, as Red Jacket stated, “‘You have got our country but are not satisfied; you want to force your religion upon us….

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Justification For Indian Removal Essay

    825 Words  | 4 Pages

    They were the most accepting when it came to transforming to the "civilized" life of the white settlers. In 1830, President Jackson convinced congress to pass the Indian Removal Act, which was “A measure that allowed state officials to override federal protection of Native Americans”(). There was absolutely no justification for why Andrew Jackson removed the Cherokee Indians from their land. In his State of the Union Address, he says "it is in the best interest of the Cherokee's to remove them west because they were not civilized"(2). Ultimately, Jackson wanted the land that the Cherokee Indians called home

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Dbq

    930 Words  | 4 Pages

    They either moved west to new lands, which were called Indian Territory, where their independence would be respected or they would have to live under Georgia laws, meaning many of their human rights such as voting would be taken away from them. This decision was completely unfair to the tribe since the region was home to them and the new lands were unfamiliar and not at all valuable to them. Jackson soon passed the bill, forcing the Cherokees to march from their homelands all the way west to a portion of the Louisiana Purchase. This march was known as the Trail of Tears where thousands of Cherokees passed away on the journey. This demonstrates how Jackson’s view of the common people was only placed on his white Americans, rather than the natives who were always in the United

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

    862 Words  | 4 Pages

    The United States has a history of holding its leaders in high honor. Since the birth of the country, statues have been instituted, monuments built, and names of locations dedicated—all in an effort to display the reverence associated with such important individuals. No leader is without their flaws, however, and this becomes a pertinent issue when taking into account the brutal history of the nation. The debate over whether we should honor our flawed leaders or not is fundamental as the U.S. wrestles with its past. Given the atrocities that many committed, no, we should not honor our flawed leaders—however, it is inevitable to do so as each leader throughout history has their flaws.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Trail Of Tears

    277 Words  | 2 Pages

    Under influence of president Andrew Jackson, the congress was urged in 1830 to pass the Indian Removal Act, with the goal of relocated many Native Americans in the East territory, the west of Mississippi river. The Trail of tears was made for the interest of the minorities. Indeed, if president Jackson wished to relocate the Native Americans, it was because he wanted to take advantage of the gold he found on their land. Then, even though the Cherokee won their case in front the supreme court, the president and congress pushed them out(Darrenkamp).

    Read More

  • Cherokee Nation 1830 Analysis

    402 Words  | 2 Pages

    On July 17, 1830, the Cherokee nation published an appeal to all of the American people. United States government paid little thought to the Native Americans’ previous letters of their concerns. It came to the point where they turned to the everyday people to help them. They were desperate. Their withdrawal of their homeland was being caused by Andrew Jackson signing the Indian Removal Act into law on May 28, 1830.

    Read More

  • Essay On Andrew Jackson Dbq

    868 Words  | 4 Pages

    Andrew Jackson was the seventh president of the United States, and arguably the most popular one. During his time in office, he did many things, such as send the Native Americans away from their home, and get into duels. Since his presidency, it has been debated on how democratic was Andrew Jackson? After looking at the documents, it has been determined that he was not democratic. He was not democratic in three ways.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Dbq

    871 Words  | 4 Pages

    After imposing political and military action on urging the Native American Indians from the southern states of America, President Andrew Jackson decided it was time to enact the Indian Removal Act of 1830. The Indian Removal act of 1830 proclaimed that all Native Americans living east of the Mississippi River were to be forced to move west of the Mississippi River where the region of the Louisiana Purchase remained. This land set aside for these Native Americans was known as the “Indian colonization zone”. Because some of the Indian tribes refused to leave their homelands, “As a result, wars broke about between the U.S. Government and Indian Tribes”(xbox360). The Indian Removal Act was originally created to have the Native Americans vacate

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Andrew Jackson's Speech

    374 Words  | 2 Pages

    This source has significant value to historians but, like any other source, has its limitations. Andrew Jackson’s motivation to remove the Cherokee from their homeland originated from an avid persona to benefit the Americans. The speech analyzes Jackson’s motivation, and specific plans to remove the Cherokee. In consideration of the speech being written in 1830, the audience can learn how Jackson was rather harsh towards the natives in order to benefit himself and others. This is evident with Andrew Jackson’s actions and his presumptions of the Natives.

    Read More

More about Andrew Jackson Point Of View Analysis

Open Document