This title gave him a boost on reasons of why he should become president. Other than that, Jackson should not have been elected president, for he made many inexpert and wrong decisions such as the Indian Removal. Andrew Jackson was considered a tyrant because of his removal of the Native Americans, overuse of vetoing, and the general fact that he just
Johnson was vice president during Lincoln’s presidency, so after the death of Lincoln, Johnson was in line to become president. This differing view believes that his qualifications were justified because he had an experienced background in politics prior to his presidency. After the Civil War, he did not effect the issues of slavery with their freedom or rights and the Reconstruction of the South. This contrary view understands how Johnson did violate the Tenure of Office Act but they believe it to be okay because he only violated it once. As stated in the Articles of Impeachment of Andrew Johnson, he “did unlawfully, and in violation of the Constitution and laws of the United States, issue and order in writing for the removal of Edwin M. Stanton from the office of Secretary for the Department of War” (citation).
In fact Indian removal was so very important to President Jackson that he had to negotiate in Tennessee. Overall the Indian removal wasn’t exactly the smartest thing Andrew Jackson had done in office. I selected Andrew Jackson since he seemed like an interesting president. I knew that he had founded the Democratic Party. I was told that most people loved him or hated him there was no in between.
Both candidates had been looking to become the President since 1816. In my opinion, Jackson was a very good president but made terrible and in humane choices. An example of this is Jackson’s approach and actions towards the native Americans and their rights. The trail of tears, which was Jacksons way of moving the Indians, resulted in over 4000 innocent
At the same time, his actions in office shocked opponents to organize the Whig party. However, the Democratic party was Jackson 's, as the national two-party system was his legacy. Jackson 's urge for a party organization was inspired by his own difficulties with Congress. Unlike other
Being the second president he was left with big shoes to fill from George Washington. Congress and citizens of the United States had extremely high expectations for him. He legacy in modern history remains controversial. Adams is remembered for his positive impacts on America by peacefully avoiding war with Britain and France, despite the pressure he faced all around him. Perhaps if Adams decided to go to war the history of the United States would have been very different.
Presidents are elected to preform and achieve greatness in America; they serve as the commander and chief of armed forces, and they find ways in coming up with agreements regarding trade and aid along with many other things. Being the president is obviously not an easy task. Have you ever thought about who you thought the best presient of the United States of America was? According to a debate in Taking Sides written by Larry Madaras and James SoRelle they presented an argument between Phillip Shaw Paludan and Melvin E. Bradford debating if Abraham Lincoln was America’s Greatest President. Many people agreed and disagreed whether or not President Lincoln was the greatest; however the sides of two professors were part in the Taking Sides issue of yes or no.
Abraham Lincoln’s assassination was unjust because he was a helper, and he was a role model; however, some believe he had too much power. There are many reasons why Abraham Lincoln’s assassination was unjust. First, it was unjust because he was a helper and he free the slaves. Also he helped out during the civil war. According to the website biography.com it says “he distributed $2 million from the treasury for war material without an appropriation from congress”.
This change made it to where a president wouldn’t have the chance of his advisors conspiring against him. Many people tend to think that Jackson is a monster for the trail of tears. The trail of tears benefited both the Indians and the North American Settlers. The Indian tribes may have had it rough but they were the first ones to have a glance at the new living and North American settlers were able to move into new land. If the trail of tears never happened North American settlers would have had a more difficult time building towns and these towns couldn’t be built then America wouldn’t have been built the way it is
How should history view Rutherford B. Hayes: hero or villain? Explain. Rutherford Hayes the 19th President of the United States didn’t win the popular vote but, “was elected president after a partisan Electoral commission awarded him all of the electoral votes in dispute.” Hayes appears to have a good personality and to have good intentions for the country. It Also seems that he has a very good reputation for honesty. “Hayes’ presidency is an excellent illustration of how party stalemate and equilibrium can hamper effective executive leadership.” Some events Hayes’ presidency that can lead to see him as a hero are the following.
Another thing Jackson promoted while he was in office was the expansion of democracy. As stated before Jackson was an influential man who came from the common people. He advocated for all working Americans to be able to vote. Once the voter quota expanded, he encouraged many people to vote for him. Matter of fact, Jackson was the first president to hold strong campaigns in order to gain support.
There were a few reasons why Jackson was Democratic, but here is one. He appointed Samuel Swartwout into office. In the book, The Life of Andrew Jackson, states,”He likes Swartwout because he had been an early supporter... and so he went ahead with the appointment.” (Doc 7) This quote explains how Jackson appointed Swartwout into office because he was a “common man”. He also happens to be in
He believed the people should have the power to elect their president. Jackson also surrounded himself with people who supported him. He had replaced the “corrupt bargain” with the “spoils system” in doing this. During his during term he did not do much, but in the reelection his beliefs about the Second Bank of the United States was the main point that determined who would be the next president. Jackson won with flying colors and he was onto his second term.
March 4, of 1829 was the day Andrew Jackson was inaugurated as president of the United States. People had high expectations for Jackson to meet throughout his presidency. Did Jackson do a good job of changing the type of people who participated in the country 's economy and politics? His presidency certainly increased equality throughout social classes. Jackson gained himself and his years as president the title of "the era of the common man" due to his efforts at making politics and the economy more accessible to white men with fewer opportunities.
Also his distinguished military career that helped him win The Battle of New Orleans is one of his few accomplishments. But all of these things do not excuse the suffering he caused for America. His total attitude towards being president was if he didn 't like something, then it will not happen. Regardless of what others think. If I were to give Andrew Jackson a letter grade for his presidency, I would give him an F because of the spoils system, the trail of tears, and the corrupted national bank.