ipl-logo

Andrew Jackson's Congress To Pass The Removal Act Of 1830

254 Words2 Pages

After many excruciating and bloody battles, one example being the Battle of Horse Show Bend, Native American tribes began to realize they couldn’t defeat Americans in war. Instead they developed a strategy of appeasement. This plan consisted of the Native Americans giving up a large portion of their land, in hopes that they could retain some of it. However, appeasement and resistance did not work. Following, Andrew Jackson convinced congress to pass the Removal Act of 1830. The Indians that left their homeland would be granted by the president land west of the Mississippi River, and this law would extend financial and material assistance on their travel. With this act in effect, Americans were permitted to influence, bribe, and threaten tribes

Show More
Related

  • Indian Removal Act Of 1830 Analysis

    214 Words  | 1 Pages

    The main purpose of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 is to have a process where the President could grant land on the west of the Mississippi River to the Indian Tribes that agreed to give up their homelands. One of the main points of the Indian Removal Act was for the President of the United States to divide the land, where the Indian Tribes will reside, into districts and let them be distinguished from others. Another main point of the Indian Removal Act is where the President of the United States has the right to exchange any or all of the districts where the Indian Tribes reside at. The last main point of the Indian Removal Act is where the President of the United States promises the Indian Tribes a country for a country. I think the Indian

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Dbq

    406 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act helped United States expansion, and supported the unification of the nation. This opportunity for the Natives to expand their territory and prosper as a people, was beneficial for them, as well as for Americans past, present and future. We’d had past treaties with the Natives, but because of infractions on both sides, none of those were beneficial for too long. In May of 1830, the act was passed, to serve as a more permanent solution to the ongoing wars. The Indian Removal Act was a step in the right direction for the United States, as it created space for American’s to settle on, grow up with, and prosper on.

    Read More

  • How Did Christopher Columbus Wrong The Americans

    1225 Words  | 5 Pages

    Nothing worked so they took it up with the senate, as a last resort. Sadly, none of these actions seemed to work it, it only strengthen Americas need to get rid of the Indians, to gain for land for the expansion in the west. All these actions evolved into the Trail of Tears. On paper it was a sound plan but in reality it was genocide act, a mass removal of Indians from all surrounding areas to travel hundreds of miles to Oklahoma territory, they did not get the opportunity to pack for this long journey. They crossed the frozen wilderness with few clothes on, very little food; it eventually caused thousands to

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Indian Removal Act Of 1790

    1501 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Act led to an array of legal and moral arguments for and against the need to relocate the Indians westward from the agriculturally productive lands of the Mississippi in Georgia and parts of Alabama. This paper compares and contrasts the major arguments for and against the

    Read More

  • What Was Andrew Jackson's Policy Of Indian Removal

    325 Words  | 2 Pages

    Jackson presidency was marked as a new era in Indian-Anglo American relations by imitating a policy of Indian removal. Even before he was elected President, Jackson opposed Washington’s policy of establishing treaties with Indian tribes as if they were foreign nations. Once he came in office, he started his plan of the removal act which he found it to be a violation of state sovereignty under the Article IV, section 3 of the Constitution. It was in his second annual message to Congress on December 6, 1830, that he informs them of his progress with the removal plan, stating that the plan were moving smoothly and explain how it benefits everyone involved. He argued that it was for the Indians own good for them to be resettled to a new plot of

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson And The Indian Removal Act

    255 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1830 Andrew Jackson signed the Indian removal Act. This gave the government power to exchange native land in the east for land in the west. The land in the west was called the Indian colonization zone and was located in northeastern Oklahoma. Native Indian were tricked and agreed to travel to Oklahoma with the Treaty of New Echota. The agreement was for ceding Indian land for money.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Research Paper

    778 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.

    Read More

  • The Indian Removal Act In The 1830's

    726 Words  | 3 Pages

    The dispersing of the Indians, particularly the five civilized tribes of the southwest: Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek and Seminole fairly began before the approval of the Indian Removal Act. As the European-Americans were progressing the procedure of passing the Act was bound to happen. They were once a secluded society and now forced to a loss of war. The Indian Removal Act was signed on 1830 by President Andrew Jackson. The act allowed President Andrew Jackson to provide the states with federal funds to remove the civilized tribes and reject the Indians from letting them to be part of the European-American society.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Breaking The Native American Circle

    1689 Words  | 7 Pages

    This act had good intentions but didn't completely work as expected. But some of the ideas to repair Native relations ended up doing the opposite and breaking the cultural circle. The trail of tears is now seen as a disastrous event killing over 4,000 Native Americans (Fischer,Leannah 1). But at the time according to Andrew Jackson the indian removal act would “enable them [Native Americans] to pursue happiness in their own way”. The Indian removal act was seen by some as a way to let Native Americans be free from the American government so they could be free like they were before European colonization.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Abuse Of Power Summary

    170 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

    Read More

  • Native Americans In The 19th Century Essay

    832 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was passed during Andrew Jackson’s presidency on May 28, 1830. This authorized the president to grant land that was west of the Mississippi River to Indians that agreed to give up their homeland. They believed that the land could be more profitably farmed by non-Indians.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson A Hero

    447 Words  | 2 Pages

    This led to the Indian Removal Act and what the Cherokee call Trail of Tears. Over several years, Jackson seized millions of acres of Indian Lands making room for cotton plantations. The Removal Act signed in 1830, by President Jackson, was to guarantee the Indians would have land in the west but these promises were later broken. The Removal Act was

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Trail Of Tears

    277 Words  | 2 Pages

    Under influence of president Andrew Jackson, the congress was urged in 1830 to pass the Indian Removal Act, with the goal of relocated many Native Americans in the East territory, the west of Mississippi river. The Trail of tears was made for the interest of the minorities. Indeed, if president Jackson wished to relocate the Native Americans, it was because he wanted to take advantage of the gold he found on their land. Then, even though the Cherokee won their case in front the supreme court, the president and congress pushed them out(Darrenkamp).

    Read More

  • Cherokee Nation 1830 Analysis

    402 Words  | 2 Pages

    On July 17, 1830, the Cherokee nation published an appeal to all of the American people. United States government paid little thought to the Native Americans’ previous letters of their concerns. It came to the point where they turned to the everyday people to help them. They were desperate. Their withdrawal of their homeland was being caused by Andrew Jackson signing the Indian Removal Act into law on May 28, 1830.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Another Indian Appropriation Act

    228 Words  | 1 Pages

    In order to control even more the natives, another Indian Appropriation Act was passed in 1871. It said that Indian tribes were no longer seen as an indepedent nation but that all Indians were just individuals, like everyone. But also that they were "wards" of the federal government. This obviously made the natives less powerful, because as a tribe, they were numerous so they had more power and they could have treaties with the government. But with the act, it did not work anymore.

    Read More

More about Andrew Jackson's Congress To Pass The Removal Act Of 1830

Open Document