The case between Angelique Lavallee and Her Majesty the Queen is one of the most famous court cases in Canadian history. I will be examining the events that led to this case, the controversial appeal of the legal recognition of battered woman syndrome, the final judgements on the case and what St Thomas Aquinas would have said about the judgements in this case.
Angelique Lavallee and her common-law husband Kevin Rust had been living together for some time and had a well-known history of being in a volatile relationship, most of the violence happening to Lavallee. Through their 3 year relationship she was the victim of multiple bruises, contusions, black eyes and even on one occasion, a fractured nose. The abusive relationship was known by
…show more content…
The obvious route that Lavallee was going to take to defend herself in this trial was claiming self defense against Rust. When claiming self defense there are three conditions that you need to follow, the first being that you were under unlawful attack at the time, the second being that they were posing a similarly threat to you and the third being necessity of defensive action. To the layperson it would seem right away that Lavallee was acting out of self defense after hearing the story of her unfortunate night, but the prosecutors believed that Lavallee’s situation wasn’t grounds for self defense. For the defense of self defense all three conditions need to have happened for it to work. The first being that Lavallee was not under unlawful attack due to the fact that she stated Rust had his back to her at the time of the shooting, meaning that he was not in a position to be assaulting her. An issue found in the second condition was that there was no threat uttered to Lavallee that put her in immediate danger, the threat uttered to you cannot be a future threat and Rust stated to Lavallee that he was going to kill her that night and not that moment. The third condition stated that Lavallee must have an alternate defensive action
He experienced mental trauma and distress as a result of the incident and sued for assault. That is why, Cullison brought a claim of assault against the Medleys and the trial court entered summary judgment. 2. Legal issues 2.1. Did Earnest commit an assault against the plaintiff?
Emma Hodges Topic 2A Defense of Mr. Smith While Mr. Smith is accused of assault, we can see that this is not true when we examine the precedent set in State v. Black. To examine both cases it is important to first know the circumstances of each. In State v. Black, the wife started a fight in which the husband, after much provocation, dragged her to the floor by her hair. In Mr. Smith’s case, his wife initiated an argument, within earshot of the couple’s eight-year-old child and a neighbor’s child, over the family’s finances and her husband’s drinking. Mr. Smith, overwhelmed by his wife’s screaming, threatened to hit her unless she stopped.
The trial judge tried to be seen as being impartial by allowing Celia to access the best defense attorneys available and allowing the case to be determined by a jury. The defense comprised of three defense attorneys who were never known to hold any strong opinion on the matter of slavery though they were very good in research. In the defense of the case the attorneys wanted to prove the motive of the murder rather than try to claim innocence in the case. They knew Celia stood a chance to be acquitted or get a lenient sentence if they played to the sympathy of the jurist and the judge over her sexual harassment under her
The case of R. v. Schoenborn is a troubling case involving the death of three children and the defence of not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder. This defence must be critically analyzed along with the evidence and expert opinions as it could absolve the accused of the charges. As well, the precedent that the verdict provides is critical to the legal system and its future implication and thus give the decision more importance. After a thorough examination of the facts, it is evident that the verdict of the Supreme Court of British Columbia is correct and reflects the administration’s objectives and beliefs. This will be demonstrated through the application of legal principles and elements.
Manitoba Court of Appeal allowed the appeal; the case was then sent to the Supreme. At the Supreme Court of Canada evidence was shown that indicated that Lavallee had been suffering this abuse for years. Lavallee was acquitted due to the fact that she had acted out of
Elsie MacGill wasn’t your average girl during the mid-1900’s. She wanted to help for the greater of human kind in all aspects of things. She wanted to be the best and in her case she was. Elsie, along with her mother were set a lot “firsts” and were top to the some of the world’s best. Elsie loved contributed to society and many other things in her lifetime including fighting for women’s rights, designing airplanes for the Second World War Elsie was born on March 27th, 1905 in Vancouver, British Columbia.
Although Cherie’s volatile relationship has not erupted into physical violence, Tyrone’s threatening behavior could easily escalate from controlling and intimidating behavior to outright domestic violence, which adds another crisis component to this case. As previously mentioned, Cherie revealed that Tyrone belittles and controls her. She also said Tyrone acts excessively jealous, limits her telephone usage and access to money and credit cards. These characteristics are often mentioned when women in domestic violence shelters describe their mate (James & Gilliland, 2013, p.302).
Birnbaum, R., Bala, N., & Jaffe, P. (2014). Establishing Canada's first integrated domestic violence court: exploring process, outcomes, and lesson learned. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 29(1), 117-171. This article discusses the process of the integrated domestic violence courts. The author talks about a study on the experience of the people who become part of this process.
The article in the Maclean’s magazine by Anne Kingston “Shacked and abandoned”, describes that two more female sexual assault complainants were jailed in Edmonton to ensure their testimony at trial. The second women was forced to spend a sleepless night at the remand Centre while seven months pregnant, she was spared proximity to attacker as he was out on bail. She was forced to travel in a prisoner transport van with a man later convicted of brutally stabbing, beating, choking and sexually assaulting her. Alberta’s Justice Minister Kathleen Ganley ordered an investigation.
2015 Australian of the year Rosemary (Rosie) Batty is a tireless domestic violence campaigner who has spoken publically about her experience and the devastating loss of her eleven year old son Luke, who was murdered by his father, to raise awareness for the widespread issue of domestic violence and to advocate for systematic changes. By bravely sharing her story through media and public speaking Rosie has compelled Australian’s to recognise that family violence can happen to anyone, regardless of social and economic status. Victoria’s Police Chief Commissioner Ken Lay has praised Rosie, calling her “the most remarkable victim” he has ever met for her efforts in raising public awareness and putting domestic violence on the national agenda.
4)Robert J. Sharpe, Patricia I. McMahon Persons Case: The Origins and Legacy of the Fight for Legal Personhood. Toronto: Univ of Toronto Press, 2007, 1-206 5) Michael Dorland and Maurice René. Charland, Law, rhetoric and irony in the formation of Canadian civil culture (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002), 218. 6) Vivien Hughes.
Nancy Hiles and Marcus Hiles: Our Success is in the Growth of the Community Being like-minded is the key Philanthropists and Founders of Western Rim Properties Nancy Hiles and Marcus Hiles have had the dream of starting their own business during their college days. This dream was realized in 2004 when they founded Western Rim Properties. The couple faced many challenges prior and post-establishment of the firm. They give credit to their mutual interest in the cause and vision for the future. The couple has faced many hardships and it is their hard work that has brought them to this position today.
Universally, domestic violence is referred to abusive behavior that is used by the intimate partner to control or power over the other intimate power. This can be in the forms of psychological, sexual, economic or emotional threats or actions that will influence your partner (Kindschi,2013).Domestic violence studies provides that psychopathology, which happens when in violent environment in child development can make the argument of domestic violence progress of being a generational legacy (Kindschi,2013).I chose to write about the Feminist Theory to explain why people commit domestic violence. It believes that the root causes of domestic violence is the outcome of living in a society that condones aggressive behavior by men, while women
What would you do if you had a gun pointed at your head by your spouse several times? Or beaten twice a week? Leslie Morgan Steiner, has been though domestic abuse and creates a speech to answer a question most people ask, “Why does she stay?” (Steiner). In the speech logos, pathos and ethos are used to make her point proven on how domestic abuse is an important issue and why it need to be spoken about.
1 Introduction Whether it be due to the ever prominent abuse of alcohol, or to the raging tempers due to everyday stresses of living in South Africa at the present moment, it can be said that perpetual domestic violence has found a place in our society, as those cases are increasingly being reported. The term ‘Battered Women’s Syndrome’ is used when referring to cases regarding a cycle of domestic violence, and through the course of this essay, this Syndrome will be investigated using a variety of sources - including South African and International case law - in order to discover whether, and to what extent, Battered Wives Syndrome constitutes a defence to a charge of murder in terms of South African law. 2 Battered Wives Syndrome A battered wife can be defined as someone – not necessarily a woman – who is subjected to perpetual domestic violence over an extended period of time to the extent that the violence develops into a cycle. This means that the abused is never sure when or where the next attack will take place.