Angkor Wat Analysis

1396 Words6 Pages
People often said “good country is a pleasure, good temples are a treasure”. If everyone in a society can obtain harmony, the whole country will be a happy place to live in. If a country has an ancient building, it can be considered as a precious property that gives many meaningful aspects. Thinking thoroughly, most countries in the world usually have something representing the nations themselves. Obviously, Angkor Wat is embedded as the heart and soul of Cambodia and Machu Picchu on the other hand, is a symbol of Peru in South America. Even if these two buildings are both historical treasures, however, it seems as though their architecture, purposes and the modern day importance have variations which showing comparing and contrasting traits to be discussed later on. Angkor Wat and Machu Picchu have some architectural differences such as materials, the time or method as well as the interior and exterior design. First of all, both of them were built from different materials. Angkor Wat was…show more content…
Interestingly, because of these thoughtful purposes, Angkor Wat and Machu Picchu are now the world heritages and eventually have become each nation’s pride. However, there is a huge difference between them based on their architecture such as the method of construction or the whole design. These features imply that both societies have achieved their goals toward the success of their impressive hard-working in non-technology era which remains a lot for people to study more in the modern day. Therefore, it is undoubtedly true that every type of historical buildings is important. That’s why it is the matter that government should keep them away from damages and educate his people to find out more about the importance of its existence and
Open Document