ipl-logo

Animal Essay: Is It Wrong To Eat Animals?

1636 Words7 Pages

Is it wrong to eat animals?

Introduction Meat is a major source of protein for human beings. We eat chicken, pork, beef, fish and others in our meal. But, some people think that it is immoral to eat animals. Thus, Is it wrong to eat animals? It has always been a question for the public to think about it. From my point of view, it is not wrong to eat animals but it is our choices not to eat animals. In this essay, I will point out a few arguments to support my view.

1. Human Diet Habits.
It is a well known fact that human are omnivorous. According to a 1999 article in the journal The Ecologist, several of our physiocological features “clearly indicate a design” for eating meat, including “our stomach 's production of hydrochloric acid, something not found in herbivores. Furthermore, the human pancreas manufactures a full range of digestive enzymes to handle a wide variety of foods, both animal and vegetable. Besides, the dental structure of human show the fact that human are omnivorous. Human are born with two canines in each arch in order to hold, grasp and tear food especially meat. The two premises are clearly stated as human are omnivorous and it is not wrong for omnivorous to eat meat. Thus, my conclusion is it is not wrong for human to eat meat.

2. Vitamins and Protein in Meat.
Eating meat provides us vitamins and protein that we could not …show more content…

So, we cannot eat animals because animals have same rights as us. But, I think that human beings are different from animals. We, humans, have a lot of abilities which animals do not have. Humans can invent new technology and gadgets in order to improve our lives. Humans can communicate with each other in languages. A human can think and plan for his future where an animal can hardly do so. From the facts above, we can easily know that human are different from animals. Thus, it is not wrong for us to eat animals as human and animals are at different

Show More
Related

  • Review Of The Omnivore's Dilemma By Michael Pollan

    789 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Thou shouldst eat to live; not live to eat”, is a famous quote by the well known philosopher Socrates, who believed this is the perspective we should take when we are eating food. Unfortunately, the times have changed and so has the way we eat. We no longer have to go hunting for our food, or grow crops to receive all of our fruits and vegetables. Because we have become a society that has grown into the new world of technology, there would be no need to rely on ourselves for what we need-- we can simply gather our resources from other people. In the book, “The Omnivore’s Dilemma”, written by Michael Pollan, takes us on a journey full of concerns of the “Food Industrial Complex”.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Gary Steiner's Animal, Vegetable Mineral

    755 Words  | 4 Pages

    Begin by reading about Rhetorical Analysis (41-54). Then, read Gary Steiner 's "Animal, Vegetable, Mineral" (769-773) and write three paragraphs. This will be your first online activity. Give it your best attempt. Help me help you.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of An Animal's Place By Michael Pollan

    1213 Words  | 5 Pages

    Animal rights and livestock farming Many of us, nowadays, eat and enjoy eating meat but many would agree that this is actually not an ethical action. Michael Pollan, in his persuasive style article “An Animal's Place" published in The New Work Times Magazine, on November 10, 2002 intends to persuade his audience that humans should respect animals and as long as they are treated well in farms and give them a more peaceful life and death it will be fine to eat them. According to Pollan, in today's huge industrial farms, cruel and unbearable things happen that are against animals rights. There is a high possibility that in the future these actions will stop as already some protest for animal rights have begun, because animals have feelings and farms take advantage of them thinking that they are mere machines, making them suffer. The solution to this conflict according to the author who supports friendly farms that respect and give a fun and secure life for animals.

    Read More

  • Omnivore's Dilemma Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    1330 Words  | 6 Pages

    Relevance between Food and Humans with Rhetorical Analysis In the modern industrial society, being aware of what the food we eat come from is an essential step of preventing the “national eating disorder”. In Michael Pollan’s Omnivore’s Dilemma, he identifies the humans as omnivores who eat almost everything, which has been developed into a dominant part of mainstream unhealthiness, gradually causing the severe eating disorder consequences among people. Pollan offers his opinion that throughout the process of the natural history of foods, deciding “what should we have for dinner” can stir the anxiety for people based on considering foods’ quality, taste, price, nutrition, and so on.

    Read More

  • Consider The Lobster By David Foster Wallace Summary

    1067 Words  | 5 Pages

    However, ethics do play a role, in that morals is one of the elements that separates us from other animals. I believe that if you kill an animal or plant for food, you should put a majority of it to use in some way. I also believe animals and plants that are grown as a source of food should have as little interaction with humans as possible. We should not eat animals and plants if we are endangering their existence by eating them. As long as animal or plant does not fall into one of these exceptions, then I believe it is ethically permissible to eat

    Read More

  • Essay On Being Pescatarian

    758 Words  | 4 Pages

    There are many reasons why people choose not to eat meat. Studies indicate how animals are mistreated. Animals’ are known to carry diseases but are more seen as impure for they are injected with steroids, drugs and hormones in order to produce larger quantities of meat which not only has a negative effect on the animal but can lead to cancer in humans. Research has claimed that

    Read More

  • Fishing Vs Hunting

    2120 Words  | 9 Pages

    Some may choose to go to a grocery store and pay for the things that are processed, rather than going and getting the freshest, free version of the same thing, in their own backyard. In cases like these, those who choose this method are not keeping any animals alive by doing so. They have to be killed first to get to the grocery store anyways. Even with that being said, many would see killing an animal to use as food as the cruelest thing a

    Read More

  • Summary: An Omnivore's Dilemma

    1766 Words  | 8 Pages

    Ever since the beginning of time, meat has been a staple of the human diet. People have many reasons why they chose not to consume meat. One of the most common reasons some people chose not to eat meat is because they believe that it is unethical. There are many processes required in order to produce meat for conception, and these processes have become widely known to the public and cause a great deal of controversy. Animals are often tortured, genetically modified, and live in squalid conditions before they become the meat we put on our dinner tables.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Lois Frazier's A Change Of Heart About Animals

    426 Words  | 2 Pages

    If the vegan or vegetarian does not eat a balanced diet, it can result in the inability to develop sufficient immunity cells from certain viruses and decrease in production of nail, hair, and skin cells. This is the first sign of malnutrition. Although, animals are an important part of our ecosystem, they are a food source in many parts of the world. To question Frazier’s ideas, would not a carnivorous animal eat you if given the chance? It is society 's obligation to treat everything and everyone with dignity and compassion.

    Read More

  • The Omnivore's Dilemma Analysis

    1180 Words  | 5 Pages

    Being humans makes us omnivores, which means we can at whatever we want. Part of the dilemma is figuring out what is safe to eat and what its safe to think. This is all determined by what your culture tells you to eat. In some cultures it is normal to eat horse while in others it is illegal. This shows how diet varies by region and culture.

    Read More

  • American Food Argumentative Essay

    562 Words  | 3 Pages

    Eating meat is not terrible, as long as the animal was free range. Eating farmed meat can actually lead to health problems because the animals are plump filled with hormones. Chickens are as big as cattle. Unfortunately, I am not really

    Read More

  • Eating Meat Is Ethical Essay

    768 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alongside to the economic benefits that meat brings into our society, meat industries also help people from the lower class. Without meat industries, people from the lower class would eventually starve out as their easy and cheap access to food would be taken away from them. Simply eating small grains and vegetables would no longer provide the same amount of nutrients in their diet as previously mentioned in the paragraph above. It is for this reason that eating meat is ethical as taking it away would cause detrimental effects to our

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Eating Meat

    1421 Words  | 6 Pages

    Eating meat is beneficial to humanity, because they provide nourishment that cannot be obtained from other sources. Without the support of animals, humans lack a distinctive diet, that is essential to their well-being. However, since animals are so important to the diet, they deserve great care and respect as well. Humans were always hunters and gathers. They always knew that meat was a big source of protein that helped keep them going(Araki).

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Rights

    967 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rights are against the use of force and they are our primary if not only our means of survival. There is only one fundamental right: To live successfully, a man has to make his own choices as well as animals too (Roleff,2014,p.33). There is a huge difference between giving animals their rights which is less than human beings and not to give them rights at all. Nowadays animals are presented in many places of entertainment such as zoos and cruces as well as aquariums where the audients pay a lot of cash to watch fun and exciting things going on, it sure makes us happy but what about the animals are they happy too? Are places of entertainment appropriate for wild animals to live in it normally?

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Killing Animals

    1227 Words  | 5 Pages

    On the one hand, some people are favorable for killing animals. It has many opinions why they have accepted. Their reasons with cruelty make them get many benefits such as nutrient, knowledge, safety, prevention, and money. The first reason for killing animals is humans killed them for consuming such as pork made from pigs, beef made from cows, and lamp made from sheep. Human’s life exists to cause by plants and animals.

    Read More

More about Animal Essay: Is It Wrong To Eat Animals?

Open Document