Down With Animal Testing There are certain things about animal testing that the community doesn’t know. Some people know what happens to those animals and they don’t want to face what happens. The inhumane treatment of animals used for research is well documented. There are many pros and cons considering the use of the animals in medical research. Animals shouldn’t be used for testing because it’s inhumane and it will make the population go down.
It is obvious that, animals are physiologically, metabolically, and anatomically different from human beings, therefore, they will react differently from human beings. Consequently, how can results from animal experiments be reliable and work on humans yet thy react differently? It is possible for the tests to fail on humans because of the anatomic and metabolic difference. And using them for experiments so as to use the same experiments on humans is very wrong. Let us stop this cruel procedure on animals because we are denying them a normal life yet, it is not yet proven that after the process is done on animals, and it can work well with human beings (Lund et al.
Animals, on the other hand, lack this mental capacity. As Baird put it "it's impossible for them, in principle, to give or withhold voluntary consent or to make a moral choice" (106). Perhaps these arguments, or defenses may not be enough to sway or convince someone that animals should be used or at least to tolerate the usage of animals here in there in testing for the benefit of mankind. But what can not be disputed it studies and facts which are also used in order to defend the postion of an advocate for the use of animals in testing and
Negative impacts of transgenic animals and crops. (9 Biggest Pros and Cons of Transgenic Animals., 2015) & (G., 2015) 1. The use of transgenic animals is unethical: - People that oppose the idea of modifying genes for animals to create offspring that will help the society in some way say that doing this is a major part when going against moral ethics. Additionally, animal advocates are particularly the main people that are not in support for this habit. These people strongly believe that animals also carry rights like humans and it’s against the rights to change their DNA and genetically modify it for human use.
Also, alternatives in the medical field are being made to replace animal testing, so animals no longer have to deal with the torture they have been subjected to, and these alternatives will most likely advance the medical field more than animal testing has advanced the medical field. Therefore, because animals cannot consent to the harmful testing that is forced upon them, testing is morally wrong and should be
I am pro animal testing because animals repopulate In the wild and in captivity so,testing won't hurt. Animals are or needed for testing in order to keep humans out of harm's way. Using animals prevents people from dying and could save more depending on the medicine being tested. Animals must be used in cases when ethical considerations prevent the use of human subjects. When testing medicines for potential toxicity, the lives of human volunteers should not be put in
It tells all about the negative details of animal testing and the harming to the animals, but it doesn’t include the benefits of animal testing. It talks about the history of developments in the medical field but denies the fact that animal testing has helped those developments. This information will help me talk about the other side of my argument. It 's good to touch base
Which she then reasons why ethically animals should not be given equality due to it being absurd. Examining each animal’s capacity to reason, suffer, emote, use language, make tools, or exhibit some other trait presumed to define what it means to be human is irrational. Therefore, rather than basing rights off of those traits make it a vulnerability discourse. There are two main animal equality arguments, Peter Singer’s Utilitarian theory, and Tom Regan’s moral recognition theory. Singer argues, “human preference for humans rests on an unsupportable biological distinction vis-a`-vis all other animals”.
Because even though farming and hunting animals has extreme consequences to the environment and the animals suffering on farms, it has little direct discomfort to humans such as seeing a mans best friend in pain. Noting that laws protecting peoples pets are more for the emotional comfort of humans and not necessarily for the welfare of animals can be highlighted with the treatment of stray animals. Fortunately in many modern societies throughout the world the treatment of stray animals has drastically improved due to charity efforts. Though these stray animals that are not owned by humans are animals of the same species that many humans own as pets. The difference is that these animals are not owned.
There are many people that say they should not be tested on. they say that it is unethical and the reasons are experimenting on animals is always unacceptable because it causes suffering to animals,the benefits to human beings are not proven, any benefits to human beings that animal testing does provide could be produced in other ways.The case for animal experiments is that they will produce such great