Do you know that a lot of the products we use on a daily basis involve some type of animal testing? Products that we use every single day are tested on animals such as Windex, Post-it notes, and even Vaseline. Animals have been used for testing since the old ages and a lot of scientists depend on the use of these animals for the development of scientific research. But is the use of animals for scientific purposes really necessary in creating these products? Even though some may say that the use of animal testing has contributed greatly to scientific research it isn 't really worth the risk and torture towards them.
The Suggestion was made that scientists should explore alternative options, such as testing on cell and tissue cultures. On the other hand, Sabin also puts forward an argument in support of animal testing, as her dear late husband Albert Sabin conducted many tests on animals whilst perfecting his vaccine against polio. The sacrifice of these animals has enabled entire generations of humans to grow up without fear of the crippling effects of polio. Animal rights advocates who see animal experimentation as cruel and wasteful overlook the fact that it has been instrumental in developing medicines that have saved countless human
Several scientists only think how to making their test successfully without knowing that animal they use are being abused and maltreated. Not all tests are relevant to human health. Certain scientific tests can cause human diseases instead of having a good effect. Testing on animals for medical research is not helpful because it can give us wrong answers. Many tests done on animals can provide misleading results.
Animal testing has been around for more than a century and millions, probably billions of animals have suffer through the pain. Animals all over the world are living their whole lives in loneliness, darkness, and pain. Animal testing has been used for ages to test drugs and cosmetic products, but it hasn’t always been effective. Animal testing may also lead to researchers believing that dangerous substances are safe for human use. People still support animal testing even through there are other better ways to test cosmetics and drugs that don’t hurt any living being.
While testing on animals might help humans slightly, is it what we should do? First, humans test animals for cures that are supposed to work on humans, but testing only proves how it works on different animals. Secondly, when something is tested on animals and is proven safe and effective, it can still be useless or detrimental to humans
Scientific innovation is based on trial and error. Experiment upon experiment is conducted in order to ensure that a certain hypothesis or treatment is valid or safe. However, there is a growing controversy behind the morality of certain types of testing; especially on animals. Scientists have been conducting experiments on animals for centuries, which has resulted in many medical advances that would have otherwise taken much longer to realize. Consequently though, a great multitude of people has begun to advocate for animal rights in this area.
Many people believe that since certain animals share a majority of the same DNA as humans, the test results will be the same. While it is true that animals are closely related to humans, there are many other factors that cause them to not be the prime subjects for imitating human reactions. Aysha Akhtar, a double board-certified neurologist, states that there are three major factors that make animal testing unreliable. First, the environment and treatment of animals in labs can cause stress and other abnormal behaviors which can potentially affect test results. Second, the complexity of some human diseases is not able to be artificially reproduced in animals.
Animal Experimentation for Medical Development The use of animals for medical research has been around for centuries, it is not a new concept and there is a deep passion for and against this practice. This topic intertwines a great deal of emotion and facts, which takes solid evidence to distinguish between the two. There is the scientific view and the view of ordinary people who challenge the morality of animal experimentation. Many of these practices have shown a negative effect on the animals used and are not for the faint hearted; however, this type of experimentation has lead to many useful vaccines and advancements for humans. Animal experimentation in the medical view is the act of testing a controlled variable on a non-human animal
According to Animal Ethics a government run sight who is for animal testing, claims that all the tests done on animals are all beneficial for our own personal use (AnimalEthics). They claim that using alternative methods does not give enough accurate insight and information on what these drugs are actually doing to the inside of a physical system. It’s easier to see for example the effect of insulin on the pancreas inside an animal instead of through a machine. Animal research has contributed to many scientific studies, but it’s the way they went about them is all wrong. These people claim to be doing the right thing, however these people are blind to the evidence that many life saving cures and treatments can be found in the other alternative testing methods.
Why Animal Testing is Wrong The human race has greatly benefitted through the use of animals. They have not only been a great form of companionship for people, but have also helped with the success in the world of medicine. For many years, the rights of animals and animal experimentation have been up for debate on whether or not it should be legal. Some may find that animal testing has led to major advancements in the medical world and that it is a small price to pay to save millions of lives, but others believe it is inhumane and that animals should be given the same rights as humans. Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval.