Animals testing on cosmetic product is unnecessary 1. Alternatives are available a. Cosmetic companies can seek better means to test their products instead of using the animal’s skin, like the artificial skin and synthetic cellular tissue that closely resembles human skin b. To develop the new products, The Body Shop choose to use natural ingredients, like some plants and fruits, as well as others with a long history that safe for human use is recommended instead of animal testing 2. It is unnecessary to hurt animals for the sake of the beauty a. The cosmestic products are not necesscity. Without the cosmestic products, we still can live.
Although it can be useful to know the side effects of something before trying it on humans, we don’t consider the effects it can have on the animals, which are often extremely harmful and cruel. Scientists have become progressive in creating alternative methods to these experiments. Now, animal testing is nearly unnecessary because there are alternatives which are more efficient and harmless. The rights of animals is a topic that comes up frequently, but people often turn their cheek the other way when it comes to their possessions being a product of cruelty.
In spite of that, some people believe that animal testing is not essential and it should be banned because animals are different from humans physically. In addition, they believe that animal tests are a waste of time and money and there are lower cost alternative methods and more effective. Our purpose of this essay is to prove that animal testing is important and has a lot of benefits and advantages for humanity. Using animals in medical and scientific experiments is necessary, because it finds many cures and treatments, animals bodies are almost similar to the human bodies, also it benefits the animals themselves from diseases.
Mice are the most used animal for scientific testing. Mankind is constructing laws for animals’ right, but because of having an inhumane scientist, they violate the rules and make their experiments. Using animals as their subject for their experiments can cost too much money and a very long period of time. In this study, Collins (2011)
Due to this realization, it seems ridiculous to continue to harm, expose to danger, and mistreat animals all in the name of science. Ethics are described as the moral principles that guide the way people behave. Ethical issues range from child labor to discrimination to animal testing. Science has put regulations and restrictions against the
Animal experiments are conducted to test whether the manufactured drugs, that are going to be put out in the market, are safe. They are also conducted as research purposes, like discovering cures for untreatable diseases. However, animal testing has been called in to question because its cruelty and lack of promised results. Is it possible to assume animal testing has become unnecessary?
Animal experimentation has been documented for hundreds of years. The initial use of testing on animals instead of humans is credited to ancient physicians in Greece. These physicians decided to use animals as their test subjects for medicine, as opposed to using humans, because of taboos in their community. They believed that by testing on animals they would be granted a higher ranking in the “scala naturae” or the chain of being (Franco). 15 centuries later and animals are still subjected to the cruelty they have been facing for over 1000 years.
Animal testing causes unneeded death to millions of animals that aren 't even protected under the Animal Welfare Act, and most experiments done on animals are flawed, wasting the lives of the animal subjects. But, there are also benefits to animal testing. For example, we wouldn 't have the polio vaccine or medical steps toward curing cancer. Even though that these benefits do exist it does not give these laboratories the right to abuse and force the animals into these tests, therefore, they should not be
Ellen Frankel & Jeffrey (2001) considered that testings should be using human instead of animals for good scientific reasons. Although some of the animals are similar to human, the DNA are different. As a result, the side effects that made by the medicine on animals and humans may not the same. Moreover, the size of humans are different from the animals, the same dose of drug may harmful some small size animals like rabbits but do not have effects on humans. It is clear that there are both advantages and disadvantages to using live animals for scientific research.
Animals testing is torture and bad so we should stop testing on animals . Animal testing is mean and dangerous to the animals being tested on. One example is they were trying to test different shampoos to see if any of them burned their eyes. To do this they hold them up by there feet with clips to test the shampoos. They don’t get feed or taken care of.
There should be laws to protect these animals like there are laws to protect us. They deserve the respect and humanity we receive, imagine your own household pet being take from you to be tortured and starved to the point of death, these animals may have never belonged to someone or had a real family but they should be given the right to have one. The test are not always valid and have no reason to be used if there are other methods using actual human cells which are more reliable. These animals have no voice over what’s happening, animal activists and large organizations try every day to give them what they deserve. Stop killing our animals and take a stand against Animal Testing
Since it is more affordable, scientists can spend less money and use the remaining to create more drugs. According to the Argumentative Essay: Animal Testing, "There is a large supply of animals for medical research." This quote portrays that the drugs are tested on more animals, meaning that they will be more reliable. If all the animals do not have negative reactions, then the drug should be safe for human use. If some animals react badly to the drug, scientists will know that it needs to be altered.
It also may be claimed by animal rights activists that the only important factor is that animal testing harms living creatures, but the only other option is to harm humans. Andre and Velasquez pointed out that “While we may have a duty to not cause animals needless suffering when we are faced with a choice between the welfare of humans and the welfare of animals, it is with humans that our moral obligation lies” (7). Though animal testing is not the most popular
Occupy Theory states, “Considering that genetic engineering employs viral vector that carries functional gene inside the human body; the consequences are still unknown. There are no clues as to where functional genes are being placed. They may even substitute the important genes, instead of mutated genes. Thus, this leads to another health condition or disease to human” (occupytheory.org). Medical research is a trial and error strategy to curing diseases that is more predictable than mutating genes that could lead to bigger problems.