Animal Testing Is Bad Science By Noah Berlatsky
Polarization is the division of one large group into two contrasting groups with different sets of opinions or beliefs. Polarization can be a result of income inequality, economic fluctuations, and different social groups. For my research topic I chose animal testing because it has been a highly debatable topic for decades. After the articles I have read and the topic I chose, polarization is a result of a group of people who tend to associate with like minded people and stray from others with separate opinions. Most of the time these groups separate into these groups because they have similar viewpoints. Most people argue whether or not animal testing is important for future medical advances like the cause of cancer. Many people in my family …show more content…
The downside to this tactic is he is completely ignoring the other side of the argument. He gives multiple examples on why animal testing is dangerous for both humans and animals. He refutes the idea that if we didn't test on animals that we would have to test on humans by stating, “No matter how many animal tests are undertaken, someone will always be the first human to be tested on” (Berlatsky). He wanted to include this because no solution to an illness can automatically work on humans. He wanted to show that no matter if there were animals to test one, there would always be some sort of testing on a human as well. He also includes in this article that animal tests are unreliable and can be more risky for humans because so many side effects are different between animal and human trials. Towards the end of his article he describes how animals are especially harmful to animals and if there is no physical harm. He wrote, “animals in laboratories typically display behavior indicating extreme psychological distress” (Berlatsky). The results of the distressed animals are inaccurate and can cause more harm to both humans and animals all while not helping further medical …show more content…
He explained this when describing how animals and humans are biologically different and included examples of times when trials have been unsuccessful, dangerous and even fatal for humans. The author wrote, “Nonhuman animals don’t contract many human diseases such as HIV, schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease, major types of heart disease, and certain types of cancer“ (Otto). This means that when scientists test new treatments on animals it is unlikely to show the same results as it would on humans. At that point the animal testing process is pointless if it’s still dangerous for humans. In this article, Otto includes examples of people who have experienced when trials have been unsuccessful, dangerous and even fatal for humans. However when successful, animal testing can have many benefits for humans and animals. This author does not address the other side of the argument and has some biased statements which can lead to polarization in the United
Scientific Boundaries In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
1132 Words | 5 PagesScientist have been overstepping boundaries in many parts of the scientific world, one of these being animal testing. Animal testing is when scientist test on animals and inject them or mutate their genes for a human gain, typically with no gain for the animal. The National Library of Medicine posted an article on the flaws and harms of animal experimentation, these flaws can be put in these, “...three major conditions undermine this confidence and explain why animal experimentation, regardless of the disease category studied, fails to reliably inform human health: (1) the effects of the laboratory environment and other variables on study outcomes, (2) disparities between animal models of disease and human diseases, and (3) species differences in physiology and genetics.” The first condition being the influence of laboratory procedures and environments on experimental results. The conditions in these experiments show that, “animals in laboratories are involuntarily placed in artificial environments, usually in windowless rooms, for the duration of their lives.
Persuasive Essay: The Role Of Animal Testing In The World
643 Words | 3 PagesIn conclusion, we rely extremely heavily on animal testing, most of us more than we know. Even over-the-counter medications that we all commonly take, have been created with the help of animal research. We rely on things every day that animal testing has made possible for us; we have loved ones that wouldn’t be here without it. We would all love to see a day where animal testing is no longer needed, but for now we have it to thank for the millions of lives it has saved, and for enabling us to grow and develop our newest
The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
773 Words | 4 PagesIn addition, The FDA reports that, ¨92% of drugs approved for testing on humans fail to receive approval for human use¨.This shows that there is no point for animal testing and that animal testing doesn't do any good for all the harm that it causes to the animals. This proves that this is important because it could also hurt humans because it could do wonders for the animals and harm us because of the different body chemistry. Paul Furlong, Professor of Clinical Neuroimaging at Aston University, states that "it's very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we're trying to achieve in the human." Therefore, animals have very different bodies then us and very different chemistry and therefore does not work well for humans at all. This suggests that, because we do not want two living things to both be harmed, animal testing is not useful.
Thesis Statement For Animal Testing
1101 Words | 5 PagesAnimal testing has long been a controversial topic. While some argue that it is necessary for scientific research and the development of new treatments, others maintain that it is inhumane and unethical. Recent evidence suggests that animal testing violates animal rights and perpetuates cruelty towards animals. Advocacy groups have exposed instances of animal abuse and mistreatment in laboratories worldwide. Additionally, there is growing concern that animal testing data is often skewed, as animals do not always respond to drugs and treatments in the same way as humans.
The Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing
604 Words | 3 PagesNoah Berlatsky. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2015. Current Controversies. Rpt. from "Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint."
Why Animal Experimentation Is Unethical
1066 Words | 5 PagesIn “Animal Testing is Bad Science” states that “The Federal Drug Administration has noted that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal test fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous.” This shows that doing experiments on animals are unreliable and do not always have the same effect on humans. In addition, animal experimentation is unethical and unreliable and it puts the animals in
Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing
398 Words | 2 PagesResearchers estimated over 26 million animals were used for scientific tests and commercial testing subject every year in the United States. Over the years animals were used to be tested on medical treatments, products for human uses, health care, and etc. The practice of researching on living animals has started since 500 BC. Opponents of this act say that it is cruel to experiment on animals, there are other methods available to replace the cruel act of experimenting on living animals, and that the human bodies and animal’s bodies are totally two different features and the research often yields irrelevant results. The federal Animal Welfare or AWA passed the animal testing act in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985.
The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
713 Words | 3 PagesThe validity and even humanity in animal testing is something on the margins of morale, it is not something done out of joy, it is not pleasurable for the testers or the tested themselves. So there, we are given a reason to submit the simple question of whether animal testing should be permitted at all. Why not simply cut our losses and move on to greener pastures, after all it is indeed the definition of grotesque to experiment on living beings and people may have been right to protest and raise awareness for such cruel misconducts. There must be something that can be done.
Persuasive Speech On Animal Testing
1152 Words | 5 PagesAnimal testing simply means the use of non-human animals in experiments, which indeed arouse great controversy in recent years. More and more people think that human being’s benefits can’t outweigh animals’
Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing
559 Words | 3 PagesThe testing could go well for animals, but backfire on humans which means do we have to test on animals if it’s non affective. Even if a product was tested on animals, some humans have gotten sick or have died due to a product. Vioxx, a drug to treat arthritis, was safe and ready to be put on the market when tested on animals, but has caused many heart attacks, strokes, and deaths. This thesis stated that the product could affect humans but not animals and evidence states that humans have died even though the products were tested. Even though some humans
Animal Testing In Society
1018 Words | 5 PagesAccording to the article, “About us” on understandinganimalresearch.org, only 0.2% of all animals in the world are used for both scientific and commercial animal testing. Animal testing is the process of experiments being done on non-human animals, and this process is performed to ensure the safety of cosmetics, drugs, and food additives. Humans only use animal testing when there is no other available options, and animal testing is practiced on endless amounts of products that are very essential in our lives today (Murnaghan). Scientists have developed great deals of vaccine and medicine, as a result, human kids, toddlers, and the elderly’s precious lives have been saved from death. Animal testing is a controversial topic in society, and while supporters
Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing
1067 Words | 5 PagesImagine an enraged animal rights activist charging toward a scientist in a white lab coat, desperate to free the little mice that are being used as test subjects. Although comical, this scene may be quite accurate when describing the passion that animal lovers have when it comes to the touchy subject of animal testing. For centuries, animal testing has been used in the medical research field, however many are now beginning to question whether it is ethical. Millions of animals are killed per year due to animal testing, so is this practice worth banning? Animal testing is a controversial subject, with supporters pointing out the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research and animal rights activists declaring it cruel and immoral.
The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
391 Words | 2 PagesEach year in the United States, millions of animals are hurt or killed in the name of science by private institutions, household companies, cosmetics companies, government agencies, and scientific centers. These companies put these animals though harsh and inhumane conditions for testing. Medical testing should not harm the lives of many harmless animals because it is ineffective, irrelevant, and cruel. Animal testing is outdated and ineffective. In the article,”Stop animal testing - it's not just cruel, it's ineffective”, it reads,”There are safer alternatives to animal testing.
Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
1012 Words | 5 PagesThere are many necessary evils in the world, animal testing being one of them. On one hand, it is being used for the greater good: to find cures that affect people all over. On the other hand, it is used to make people smell and look good. Sometimes, the animals being tested are treated ethically and with respect. Other times, those exact animals are tortured and left to live a life that no one deserves.
Pros And Cons Of Animal Research
190 Words | 1 PagesWhile there are numerous pros and cons of animal testing, the scientific benefits overshadows the cons against the subject. In many minds, animal testing is viewed as an unfortunate topic, and I acknowledge that, but in my opinion, animal testing is a vital role in medical advancements. Animals and humans are very similar, we have the same organ systems that perform similar tasks. Throughout the last decade animal research was a critical component in nearly every medical breakthrough. Multiple diseases that once killed millions of people every year are now either treatable or have been abolished altogether.
More about Animal Testing Is Bad Science By Noah Berlatsky
Scientific Boundaries In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
1132 Words | 5 PagesPersuasive Essay: The Role Of Animal Testing In The World
643 Words | 3 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
773 Words | 4 PagesThesis Statement For Animal Testing
1101 Words | 5 PagesThe Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing
604 Words | 3 PagesWhy Animal Experimentation Is Unethical
1066 Words | 5 PagesArgumentative Essay On Animal Testing
398 Words | 2 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
713 Words | 3 PagesPersuasive Speech On Animal Testing
1152 Words | 5 PagesPersuasive Essay Against Animal Testing
559 Words | 3 PagesAnimal Testing In Society
1018 Words | 5 PagesPersuasive Essay On Animal Testing
1067 Words | 5 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
391 Words | 2 PagesPros And Cons Of Animal Testing
1012 Words | 5 PagesPros And Cons Of Animal Research
190 Words | 1 Pages