ipl-logo

Animal Testing On Cosmetic Products Should Be Banned

1028 Words5 Pages

nimal testing on cosmetic products should be banned

CHAN KA YAN
14208652
GCPS 1005. Section 1
22,March,2016-03-21
Section Instructor’s Name: Jessie

Specific purpose: To persuade the audience with three reasons that animal testing on cosmestic products should be banned

INTRODUCTION

(attention getter) Anyone sitting here have used the cosmetic products before? (relate to audience) I guess no girls haven’t tried the cosmestic products before.Actually, more and more boys use cosmestic products now. But do you know how’s the cosmestic products are made?
(background) One day, I watched the apple daily news. The video was impressed me a lot. The pictures are so crucial. After that I change my preference of using …show more content…

Animals testing on cosmetic products is unethical

A. Animals testing is cruel to animals
1. Unethical scientists hurt animals physically
a. For example, they put the cosmetic and medicines into the rabbit’s eyes, which make their eyes fester, swell, pain and death are generally the end results
b. The experimenter take out dog’s vocal chords so that they don’t disturb their testing
c. The experimenters will use the animals again for further testing until they die, these nightmare to them will repeat and repeat

2. Unethical scientists hurt animals mentally
a. Animals and human are similar in many ways. They both can think and feel pain. Their reactions to pain are identical as human, like screaming. If human face the maltreatment, we feel sad, animals do.

b. Some research find that animals afraid of the repeating experiments and even tears all the time. However, human always ignore their feeling.

B. Animals' rights are ignored
1. Animals have no option
a. Animals are compelled to be tested and often painful or cause invariable damage or death, and they are never given the choice of not participating in the research

2. Human are deprived of the animals’ freedom of …show more content…

Animals testing on cosmetic product is unnecessary

1. Alternatives are available
a. Cosmetic companies can seek better means to test their products instead of using the animal’s skin, like the artificial skin and synthetic cellular tissue that closely resembles human skin

b. To develop the new products, The Body Shop choose to use natural ingredients, like some plants and fruits, as well as others with a long history that safe for human use is recommended instead of animal testing

2. It is unnecessary to hurt animals for the sake of the beauty
a. The cosmestic products are not necesscity. Without the cosmestic products, we still can live. If we continue to do animals testing, the more animals will die.

b. Beauty is not only talking about the appearance, but also your heart. If you hurt the animals, even your apperance is good, you are not beautiful. CONCLUSION
(transitions)

(simple summary)

(call to action) I. Many alternatives can replace the cruel animal testing. It is no longer to do toxicity testing by depriving the life of animal and prove that animals testing is unnecessary

Show More
Related

  • Informative Speech Outline On Animal Testing

    268 Words  | 2 Pages

    Purpose: To inform the audience about animal testing I. Introduction A. Attention getting device: Approximately 26 million animals are used every year in US laboratories for cosmetic and biomedical research. B. Thesis: I would like to inform you about how animal testing is conducted. C. Credibility: I have read and studied the articles about animal testing. D. Preview: I am going to share with you purposes of animal testing, how animals are used in laboratory tests, and the effectiveness of animal testing.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Satire

    1445 Words  | 6 Pages

    When a person walks in a beauty store such as Sephora or Ulta, and they buy a twenty two dollar eyeshadow, then that’s just more money for them to spend on animal testing. That’s why a lot of cosmetic products are highly expensive, and societies everywhere are contributing whether they are consciously aware of it or not. Everyone’s tax dollars play a huge role as well. In 2010, the National Institutes of Health was recorded to use forty percent of its budget on animal testing. That equals to about sixteen billion dollars of the United States taxpayers’ money.

    Read More

  • The Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing

    604 Words  | 3 Pages

    Noah Berlatsky. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2015. Current Controversies. Rpt. from "Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint."

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay Why Animal Testing Is Wrong

    1111 Words  | 5 Pages

    Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing In Medical Research

    1866 Words  | 8 Pages

    Henceforth, as animal testing increased, so did the controversy surrounding it (“Animal testing,” n.d.). Moreover, with the help of animal testing, various treatments and medicines are developed for unconventional diseases. Although animal testing may seem ruthless, animals are used for experimental research that contributes to science if there are no other possible substitutes. Animal testing is a debatable topic that still continues to be one until this time. Animal experimentation should persist because it saves human’s life from diseases, ensures cosmetics’ safety, and improves medical

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech On Animal Testing

    1152 Words  | 5 Pages

    But let me tell you a story. When asking experimenters why they experiment on animals, the answer is “because the animals are like us”. But when asking experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, the answer is “because the animals are not like us”. (relate to audience) II. So whether animals are like humans or not?

    Read More

  • Should Animal Testing Be Illegal Essay

    864 Words  | 4 Pages

    We wouldn’t subject our pets to burning, starving, and isolation, so why is it okay to subject other animals to this cruel treatment? Animal testing is harmful not only because it is unsafe, but because it poses a question of moral judgement. Testing on animals should be illegal because it is unethical, drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe, and many animals lack the protection required for their safety. ​ Many people are unaware of the torture animals in labs must endure when being tested on.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing In The Cosmetics Industry: A Case Study

    1142 Words  | 5 Pages

    If a regulatory body demands it for its safety or regulatory assessment, an exception can be made." (Elcompanies.com, 2018b) While cosmetic testing on animals was banned in certain countries, China passed a law on 30 June 2014 to eliminate the requirement for animal testing of cosmetics. (Ly, 2015) This law forced all brands who wants to enter the China market will need to go through this cruel procedure.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Beneficial Essay

    574 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animal Experimentation: Is it Beneficial? Animal testing, otherwise known as vivisection has been around prior to the 19th century, in fact, in 1973 there was already a total of over 1,500,000 animals being experimented on. Britain was the first to stand up against animal testing, stating that it was cruel in 1876 with the Cruelty to Animals Act. America on the opposing hand, launched an animal testing boom in the first quarter of the twentieth century when cosmetic animal testing began when totals reached over 1,300,000 animals tested. The animal testing controversy has been a big one, it is no way beneficial to society nor is it humane for animals.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

    770 Words  | 4 Pages

    Should animals be suffering just because humans are trying to advance our medical techniques? Should they be forced to eat? Should people be allowed to torture them this way? Do you think so? In fact, more than 100 million animals are killed each year during scientific and commercial testing, in the U.S alone.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

    1225 Words  | 5 Pages

    This proves how immoral it is to test on animals especially since the law does not require the cosmetics to be tested. The most plausible answer for why the animals are being tested on is a business wants to make money and if the business cosmetic is unsafe and harms one human then no one is going to want to buy another cosmetic from that business. This could leave a business with no

    Read More

  • Should Animal Testing Be Allowed Essay

    594 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are other ways to go. Some countries have even prohibited makeup animal testing. I think this is a huge step and only taking us the next step which is closer to banning animal

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Should Animal Testing Be Banned?

    859 Words  | 4 Pages

    Science researches believe that products which have been tested on animals will make humans’ life better. However, the main concern on this issue is that animals are suffering from unnecessary pain. Animals are mostly exposed to radiation, forced to inhale poisonous gases and injected with harmful substances prior to the experiment. Thus, animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, the result is unreliable and expensive.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Utilitarianism

    2744 Words  | 11 Pages

    Introduction Animals testing have significantly contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge in general and to biomedical progress specifically. Many example showing that laboratory animals in medical development and other aspects have significantly influenced human health and reduced suffering, for example improved diagnosis of infectious disease (Hau, Jann, Schapiro & Steven, 2002). But since 1960s and 1970s, animals testing protests has gained prominence and strength, people start to argue is it moral to continue “cruel” animal testing. Animal Testing is a Moral Act In the rest of this article, I shall apply different concept under utilitarianism try to discuss whether animal testing are moral acts. It is important to notice that (1) in this article, applying the general idea of utilitarianism which is “the greatest happiness of greatest number” and (2) the animals testing under the rules and regulations.

    Read More

  • Should Animal Testing Be Banned

    967 Words  | 4 Pages

    Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.

    Read More

More about Animal Testing On Cosmetic Products Should Be Banned

Open Document