There are many ways that animal testing greatly reduces expenses on studies and research. The normal costs of research into medicinal studies is shockingly expensive. If something goes wrong due to the lack of testing, it causes the development process to become even longer than it was originally intended to last. This adds onto an already lengthy bill. According to Annamaria Bottini, “ animal tests provide their contribution, both with regard to costs and time to market and, more importantly, when wrong decisions on the efficacy and safety of lead substances are taken based on the animal tests performed in the R&D process” (Bottini 9).
Over thousands of animals become extinct. The only thing that people do not know is that testing is the reason they are getting extinct. Some people say that animal testing is good and it does not do any harm. Some say we should continue testing on animals to find cures. Testing on animals kill them or torture them to do the testing.
With today’s day and age, people have so many different and better options than animal testing. According to www.onegreenplanet.org, “clinical observation, clinical research, in vitro research with human tissue, autopsies, computer modeling, technology, human drug surveillance, epidemiology, pathology, preventive medicine ” are some ways that are an alternative to animal testing. The claim is supported by this piece of evidence, because it lists other methods besides animal testing to test new medicines and cures. Although some of these methods may be expensive, at least animals won’t get hurt. Some people may believe testing on similar working body system is a better way of getting results.
But at what price? Animals are different from humans and offer poor and irrelevant experimentation results. Substances which pass animal tests are not automatically safe for us. Therefore, we should stop testing on animals because it is wasteful, it can 't predict the effects of a substance on a human being and it is archaic and outdated. So, what exactly is animal testing?
However, as time progresses animal testing has been put under criticism and some question the methods used. Isn’t animal testing however, made for the greater good? The main purpose for testing on animals is so that we can save and benefit millions of lives. Animal
Animal testing is not a reliable way to test medicines, animal testing is wasteful and dangerous, and above all animals are not like us. To begin, Animal testing is not a reliable way to test medicines. According to Cruelty free international “It is not surprising to find that treatments showing ‘promise’ in animals rarely work in humans”. This shows that animals
Scientist test all different kind of drugs on the animal to see if they can cure the disease the animal has, if it works on the animals it might have a chance to work on humans. The problem is that the chance is really small. Medical research should not be tested on animals because almost all the experiments that are tested on animals are too harmful
“Nine out of ten drugs that pass animal studies fails in humans” (Moore 2). Many patients in the world of medicine need drugs with low risk factors. Animal experiment is becoming a thing of the past and for good reasons. The experiments are no longer answering the scientists questions, but when the products does work on animals it is never going to be hundred percent for humans. Animal experimentation is wrong because animals can register pain just like humans, the medication is not reliable, and money is lost when it is ineffective.
People need medicine to survive, heal, and improve physical and mental health. Many would argue that animal testing is important, and that it is better to do tests on animals than to people. While it may be true that people are more important, there are other alternatives. Some alternatives include growing human cells in labs, which can be done with just about any cell, human tissue donations, computer models, and volunteer microdosing, which is examining how a miniscule dose affects the body. These alternatives are much safer, much more reliable, and not to mention, much more
In conclusion, I disagree with use animals for experiments because testing animals may be only a little life which was forgotten. Some species were classified as animals disgusting. But what of the animals was back with an enormous value which allows humans to develop various medical science and help humans survived a disease. It would not be wrong to say that the success of these is what is derived from experimental animals. So, it is time we should look at the lives of animals as creatures that must bear the pain instead of