Many of the concerns of the ethicality of animal experimentation is understood by the people who still believe animal testing is necessary. Many regulations are enforced on animal studies in an attempt to make them as moral as possible. Additionally, there are also campaigns that advocate the regulation on animal testing “ which advocates the search (1) for the replacement of animals with non-living models; (2) reduction in the use of animals; and (3) refinement of animal use practices “ (Hajar 7). They understand the upset at the idea of animal testing, and they want to appease the masses by keeping the testing as humane as it can possibly be. Even with all of the outcry, there is a large group of people that see animal experimentation as a necessary evil.
There is different pros for animal testing, including helping researchers to find drugs and treatments, help ensure the safety of drugs, there are no other testing alternatives, and it provides an opportunity to examine a complete life cycle. “The major pro for animal testing is that it aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. Many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more” (Murnaghan). “Another important aspect to note is that animal testing helps to ensure the safety of
They say that is for their benefit, but really that they are selfish and they want the food and drink for themselves. Without it, they would not fulfill their duties. On page 52, the author states, “Do you know what would happen if we pigs failed in our duty? Jones would come back!” The animals are being put in the position is which they fear the one that abused they came back. This type of propaganda technique is very effective because it motivates the subjects by fear.
It is a very clever way to do. George Orwell entrusted his dissatisfaction of the union of Soviet with his construction of the animal world. It is really ingenious to use animals instead of just portraying people under the certain time. Using animals and personification is a good way of attracting the attention of the audience and makes the whole story more vivid. The strivings and struggles between different animals help amplify the conflicts showed in the book.
In spite of that, some people believe that animal testing is not essential and it should be banned because animals are different from humans physically. In addition, they believe that animal tests are a waste of time and money and there are lower cost alternative methods and more effective. Our purpose of this essay is to prove that animal testing is important and has a lot of benefits and advantages for humanity. Using animals in medical and scientific experiments is necessary, because it finds many cures and treatments, animals bodies are almost similar to the human bodies, also it benefits the animals themselves from diseases. One of the major issues that support animal testing is the fact that it has been used successfully in history to develop cures and treatments for diseases which killed human being in large numbers.
Animal testing is a controversial subject, with supporters pointing out the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research and animal rights activists declaring it cruel and immoral. However, both sides agree that it would be beneficial to reduce animal suffering by finding alternatives to this practice. On one side of the spectrum, supporters of animal testing point out how valuable the practice is to scientists, and the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research. According to the Foundation for Biomedical Research (FBR), “…practically every drug, treatment, medical device, diagnostic tool or cure we have today was developed with the help of lab animals” (“Benefits of Biomedical Research”). The FBR is clearly stating that, without the help of animal testing, medical advances would be nearly impossible.
The ideologies of evolution and the natural world call for a being of any species to have its justification for freedom. Zoos that captivate these animals violate many of these ideologies as well as heavily interfere with the evolutionary and instinct based sides of these animals. Life typically finds a way and these animals will exhibit violence in order to be free and roam freely again. Zoos simply serve no purpose for the protection or conservation of any endangered species. They simply serve as a business idea to formulate appeals to the masses in search of profit.
b. Beauty is not only talking about the appearance, but also your heart. If you hurt the animals, even your apperance is good, you are not beautiful. CONCLUSION (transitions) (simple summary) (call to action) I. Many alternatives can replace the cruel animal testing.
This new policy ensures that the use of animals is permissible as long as it is approved by the necessary agencies and standards of animal welfare and care. By this law, this protects the animals from abuse from illegal animal testing. Clinical testing were filtered and sort out after the law was enforced to minimized the use of animals. Through this laws and procedures, animal testing is acquiring more positive feedback since the officials are doing something to minimized and protect them. Considering it morally, is a judgment where we have to think of the greater good and the benefits it may give the humans.
And yet, it is difficult to be completely biased and think we should stop animal testing once and for all. However, in this essay, I will try to balance the controversy by outlining why such practices should be cut down significantly, but still kept in a certain percentage. First of all, it is important to mention that many human lives have been saved thanks to cures that have been first tested on animals. It is impossible to neglect the fact that there is a vast number of treatments and cures available, that wouldn’t have come to light if there hadn’t been series of experiments conducted on animals. Despite sounding unethical or immoral, we have to acknowledge that millions of lives have been saved.
Should anmals be used for entertainment all around the world? Some peple say no animals should not be used for entertainment because it can damage thier wildlife. Other people say animals should be used for entertainment because of the awards and prizes they get. This controversy was discused in a video,” Should Animals Be Used As Entertainment” an article,” The Use Of Animals In Entertainment” another article,” Jump To It”. While the authors presented their arguments to the same people, they used different sources to persuade the people to support their claim.
If the animals are killed for our basic human needs than it should not be wrong. I agree with Bob Stevens in his letter to Rifkins when he mentions the fact that pigs would get toys even though there are human beings in the world who do not have such things. He makes a very essential point. I would
They have to use a healthy animal to start off with to use as a variable to notice the effects of their testing, this is not fair nor right to the animal. This is also done just so you can have clean hair and skin, and so you can look pretty, which we take for granite. Test which animals go through are horrible, according to a Q & A done by Humane Society International about Cosmetics Animal Testing an Animals skin is shaved and rubbed with chemicals, then they put chemicals in their eyes, but it gets worse they also make them swallow the chemicals
Those animals are subjected to this cruelty for the sole purpose of being used in classroom teaching, despite alternative teaching methods being available that have been reported as being more effective and actually saves the schools money. Supporters of animal testing will argue that in the past, most medical breakthroughs involved some form of animal research. That is true. Experimental drug testing on animals was a successful way of discovering cures for diseases in the past. An excellent example is the discovery of insulin to treat diabetes.