Those who support animal testing argue that animal testing in cosmetics is necessary to ensure that the product is safe for human use. They argue that “there is no adequate alternative to testing on a living whole-body system” (“Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing”), and this is why “animals are appropriate research subjects because . . . animals and humans are so biologically similar” (“Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing”).
Some have said that using animals is contradicting our claim on finding accurate cures because animals are different than humans which means they will react differently. Although this is true and they are not exact carbon copies of us, they are close enough to receive results from. Vittana.org states, “The reason why mice are frequently used in animal research is that their genetic profile is 98% similar to
Many people asks everyday “Are GMOs bad for my health?” The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in the USA regulates genetic engineering with animals and their products under the new animal drug provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). It helps monitor and maintain certain standards, including input from the public, when it comes to genetically engineering animals. The ‘new animal drug’ provisions of the FFDCA focuses on whether the new animal drug is safe for the animal and if it is effective. If the drug is for a food-producing animal it also focuses on whether the resulting food is safe to eat. Is safe for the animals?
And 21 century science would be more trustworthy from all the years and money on improving it. Some alternatives to animal testing are doing vitro testing(In Testing | Alternatives to Animal Testing and Research), genetic testing, microdosing-humans receiving small doses of drugs-, MRI and CT scans, etc. (In Testing | Alternatives to Animal Testing and Research) Others have thought otherwise because it has created some great medical breakthroughs. Such views are misguided because so many animals are harmed horribly and there are so many more ways that we could find cures Animal testing is cruel, unnecessary and should be banned. Sure, there are some diseases that get cured, but in the five years of testing, millions of animals die.
Animal testing Animal testing is doing experiments on animals to ensure about the side effects of the drugs and how effective it is , this includes the cosmetics for women to prevent any disorders for them and to ensure about the pharmaceutical result of the drug . As estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for "scientific and commercial testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. Research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 BC". So the issue of animal testing is very controversial, can we imagine ourselves in a small cage being tested on chemicals without knowing the results whether they are going to help or kill us ???
Chimpanzees are one of the most commonly used animals in the lab for mainly one reason, that the share 99% of the DNA that humans have. Mice, another very common animal in testing, share 98% of the same DNA we have. Animal testing only works if the animal we are testing on is similar to humans. If the subject the scientist is experimenting on is not similar to humans, the experiment will not be conclusive if it will work on a human subject. The animals tested have the same seat of organs we have with nearly the same functioning bloodstream and nervous system.
Finally, you will get the answer I promise. (background) III. Animal testing simply means the use of non-human animals in experiments, which indeed arouse great controversy in recent years. More and more people think that human being’s benefits can’t outweigh animals’
Animal Experimentation for Medical Development The use of animals for medical research has been around for centuries, it is not a new concept and there is a deep passion for and against this practice. This topic intertwines a great deal of emotion and facts, which takes solid evidence to distinguish between the two. There is the scientific view and the view of ordinary people who challenge the morality of animal experimentation. Many of these practices have shown a negative effect on the animals used and are not for the faint hearted; however, this type of experimentation has lead to many useful vaccines and advancements for humans. Animal experimentation in the medical view is the act of testing a controlled variable on a non-human animal
Commercial Test on Animals should be banned Have you ever wonder how are all products made? Have you taken the time to see what variety of shampoo, makeup, body wash, or other products are you using? Now a day many commercial products before being sold in a store, they should pass through some tests and some products should be tested on animals before being sold. If a product hasn't been tested, it's an experimental product, what if that product starts to develop an allergy or a serious condition that can affect drastically our body. Animal testing its something kind of inhuman, even if animals don't understand and cannot act like humans but they are living things.
Is Animal Testing Justified Ethically? The idea and processes of animal testing and experimentation originated thousands of years ago. Back then it was only used for medical research and curiosity. Nowadays, animal testing and experimentation is used for a wide range of things; determining the effectiveness of a cancer treating drug or if a cosmetic product causes skin or eye irritation. For many years scientists used animal testing guilt-free and had made many medical advances using it’s methods.
Such as, elephants, chimps, monkeys, dolphins and even octopuses. The closest thing that scientists have to a circulatory system are animals, unless humans are willing to sacrifice their life for a simple scientific cause. Another way to test on besides animal testing is through computer models but according to the California Biomedical Research Association “Computer models can only be reliable if accurate information gleaned from animal research is used to build the models in the first place”. In other words they still need to test on animals (not much, but very little) to create the model they need to test on. Furthermore, the California Biomedical Research Association also stated that “Even the most powerful,
According to PLOS Biology, a renowned peer reviewed scientific journal, it is possible for alternatives to be used as a complementary resource with the research of toxicology but more research and time is needed before they can completely replace animal testing in most cases. A poll that was taken in 2006 asked natural scientists to rate the importance of animal testing the results were as follows: "on a scale of 1 (not at all necessary) to 4 (essential), three quarters of all respondents, including those who do not work with animals themselves, said it was essential" (Ainsworth). That is not to say that we should give up on these alternatives, after all, they do have the potential to be more effective and more accurate than animal testing. The three R(s), which are currently the most accepted guidelines, advocate the use of alternative wherever
According to my research, animals has been in used for scientific testing early as 500 B.C. Scientist use animals purposely for medical treatment, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and healthcare uses (Animal Testing, 4). It is estimated that over 26 million animals are used yearly in the U.S for scientific testing or other purpose. The reason why animals testing is so important for scientist and ultimately human race is because, animals testing allow the progress of life saving treatment for humans and animals. Second profound reason is, there no alternative means of conducting research that requires a complete living organism.
Topic Sentence/Main Claim: Many people think animal testing is bad because it is “unethical”. This is not a very good claim because animal testing helps us with so many things without harming humans. The government is also taking away all of the unnecessary animals in labs. Many people say that we would fund new medicines faster if we use humans for testing. If we did testing on humans we would find cures faster but we would be harming ourselves, when animals do a good job and don’t harm any humans.
(Karayiannis et al. 2004). Although testing on animals is not morally ideal, product safety assurance, disease control, and veterinary studies all depend on animal-testing. Without animal testing, almost every product distributed in the world would be based on theory. No one would buy a product that could potentially damage eyes, be cancerous or cause any type of harm.